Gradation. Percentages passing the given sieve sizes shall be as follows: Sieve Sizes Percent Passing ½ inch (12.5mm) 100 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 95 - 100 No. 4 (4.75 mm) 20 - 90 No. 8 (2.36 mm) 10 - 60 No. 30 (0.60 mm) 0 - 15 When test results for the Sodium Chloride furnished exceed the gradation requirements above, adjustment points will be assessed as follows: Adjustment Points Sieve Size ½in. 3/8in. No.4 No.8 No.30 12.5mm 9.5mm 4.75mm 2.36mm 0.60mm For each 1.0% up to 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 For each 1.0% > 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 Gradation adjustment points for the quantity represented shall be the sum of points calculated for up to 3% out of tolerance and the points calculated for greater than 3% out of tolerance. Where Buyers determine that a sample does not meet specifications in chemical composition, moisture, and/or gradation, the following shall be the method of determining the final price per ton:
Gradation. Percents passing the given sieve sizes shall be as follows: Sieve Sizes Percent Passing ½ inch (12.5mm) 100 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 95 - 100 No. 4 (4.75 mm) 20 - 95 No. 8 (2.36 mm) 10 - 65 No. 30 (0.60 mm) 0 - 20 When test results for the sodium chloride furnished exceed the gradation requirements above, adjustment points will be assessed as follows: ADJUSTMENT POINTS FOR GRADATION Adjustment Points Sieve Size ½in. 3/8in. No.4 No.8 No.30 12.5mm 9.5mm 4.75mm 2.36mm 0.60mm For each 1.0% up to 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 For each 1.0% > 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 Gradation adjustment points for the quantity represented shall be the sum of points calculated for up to 3% out of tolerance and the points calculated for greater than 3% out of tolerance. Where Buyers determine that a sample does not meet specifications in chemical composition, moisture and/or gradation, the following shall be the method of determining the final price per ton: First, tons eligible for payment shall be calculated above. Moisture: Second, a deduction, as specified above, will be made for gradation failure. Finally, the deduction will be determined for chemical composition, unless the chemical composition falls below 84.5 percent at which time the entire amount will be paid for as snow and ice abrasives as noted above.
Gradation. (i) Unless otherwise directed or approved by the Engineer, the grading of sand shall be within the limits indicated hereunder : IS Sieve Designation Percentage passing for Grading Zone-I Grading Zone-II Grading Zone-III Grading Zone-IV 10mm 100 100 100 100 4.75mm 90 – 100 90 – 100 90 – 100 95 – 100 2.36 60 – 95 75 – 100 85 – 100 95 – 100 1.18mm 30 – 70 55 – 90 75 – 100 90 – 100 600 micron 15 – 34 35 – 59 60 – 79 80 – 100 300 micron 5 – 20 8 – 30 12 – 40 15 – 50
Gradation. Sieve Sizes Percent Passing ½ inch (12.5mm) 100 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 95 - 100 No. 4 (4.75 mm) 20 - 95 No. 8 (2.36 mm) 10 - 65 No. 30 (0.60 mm) 0 - 20 When test results for the Sodium Chloride furnished exceed the gradation requirements above, adjustment points will be assessed as follows: ADJUSTMENT POINTS FOR GRADATION Sieve Size Adjustment Points ½ inch 3/8 inch Xx. 0 Xx. 0 No.30 12.5 mm 9.5 mm 4.75 mm 2.36 mm 0.60 mm For each 1.0% up to 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 For each 1.0% > 3.0% Out of Tolerance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 Gradation adjustment points for the quantity represented shall be the sum of points calculated for up to 3% out of tolerance and the points calculated for greater than 3% out of tolerance. The minimum required number of tests will be as set out in “INDOT Manual for Frequency of Sampling and Testing and Basis for Use of Material, revised January 2017. Samples will be taken by or under the supervision of a representative of the department. All materials being used are subject to inspection, test, or rejection at any time. Where the Indiana Department of Transportation or OSA determines that a sample does not meet specifications in chemical composition, moisture and gradation, the following shall be the method of determining the final price per ton:
Gradation. Fills objects using a gradation that grows lighter towards the center. This can only be specified when Translucent mode is selected in Fill. Gradation Width Specifies the fill width when using the gradation filling. Gradation is used to fill the distance of the width specified from the inside of the frame. Areas not within the gradation width will not be filled. Gradation is applied from the Translucency value specified to 100; Translucency can be specified between 0 and 100. Solid Margin Specifies the solid margin width when using gradation filling. The solid margin width within the gradation width is filled without using gradation, while the remainder of the gradation width is filled using gradation. Reverse Reverses the gradation direction when using gradation filling. Objects are filled using gradation that grows darker towards the center. Areas not within the gradation width will be filled using the Translucency value specified. Type Specifies the type of line for Extend Line on the Edit menu. This is only displayed when Extend Line is selected. Height Specifies the height in mm of Extend Line arrows on the Edit menu. This is only displayed when Extend Line is selected. Width Specifies the width in mm of Extend Line arrows on the Edit menu. This is only displayed when Extend Line is selected.
Gradation. Sieve Sizes Percent Passing ½ inch (12.5mm) 100 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) 95 - 100 No. 4 (4.75 mm) 20 - 95 No. 8 (2.36 mm) 10 - 65 No. 30 (0.60 mm) 0 - 20 When test results for the Sodium Chloride furnished exceed the gradation requirements above, adjustment points will be assessed as follows:
Gradation. Time period as of date of purchase Percentage material replacement of the quantity found to be defective up to 5 years 100% in the 6th year 75% in the 7th year 60% in the 8th year 45% in the 9th year 30% in the 10th year 15% If we are unable to provide replacement material, the buyer will receive a reimbursement of the purchase price in accordance with the gradation.
Gradation. SPECIFICATIONS All standard sizes of aggregates shall meet the gradation requirements of Table 905-1 when tested in accordance with AASHTO T27, except that aggregate to be used in a base course or as a stabilizer aggregate will be tested for gradation in accordance with AASHTO T88 as modified by the Department. Copies of the modified test procedures are available upon request from the Materials and Tests Unit. The amount of material passing the No. 200 sieve will be determined by washing. Standard sizes of coarse aggregate are identified by numerical or alphabetical designation. Standard sizes of fine aggregate are identified by number followed by the suffix “S”.
Gradation. The gradation when tested in accordance with the method provided in A.S.T.M. D-1214 (by use of U.S. Standard Sieves) shall be: Size of Sieve % Passing (by Weight) 850 μm (No. 20) 100 600 μm (No. 30) 80-100 300 μm (No. 50) 18-35 180 μm (No. 80) 0-10
Gradation. Evaluation gradations facilitate the identification of different levels of performance in each evaluated item. One gradation can be used for a number of different evaluation factors or different gradation can be selected for each factor depending on the gradation type that best suits the factor in question. Gradation should be drawn up as relative indicators in that the grade in the middle of the gradation corresponds with the workplace’s average standard. Gradations should be drawn up in a way that ensures that there will be determination results in every grade. Different grades are supplied with verbal and/or numerical sufficiently simple descriptions, which facilitate the uniform use of the gradation. As evaluation factors and gradations are the same for everyone in the workplace, the descriptions cannot be very detailed. In practice, it is important to highlight gradations more concretely during supervisor training. This will guarantee that gradations are applied according to the same standards in different duties. When evaluating job performance, it is compared to the gradation’s descriptions and a grade that best corresponds with the evaluated person’s competence and job performance is selected. In practice, the recommended number of grades is 3 or 5. The number of grades is influenced by the measured factor’s weight, its content and the amount of fluctuation, i.e. the so-called differential threshold. The grades shall be determined so that there is a clear, perceivable difference between them that can be measured. POINTS OF EMPHASIS BETWEEN EVALUATION FACTORS The workplace’s evaluation factors can be given different weight according to their importance. They will then influence the final evaluation in this scope. None of the selected factors are too dominating or too insignificant. The weight of individual competence factors should be between 15 and 50%. Additionally, the selected weight must be realised in both the lowest and highest grade.
