Guideline Review Sample Clauses

Guideline Review. [Sub-Adviser] shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the portfolio manager(s) at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event of a conflict between this Schedule A and the Quintara Funds registration statement filed with the SEC, as amended and supplemented from time to time (collectively, the "Prospectus"), the term of the Prospectus shall govern. SCHEDULE B (Quintara Small Cap Value Fund) Allocation: ------------ Each sub-adviser will be allocated an equal amount of the assets of the Quintara Small Cap Value Fund ("the Fund") on the first day of operation of the Fund, plus an equal amount of daily net flows (positive and negative) to and from the Fund. (The Adviser, however, has the right to reallocate the assets between sub-advisers, if the Adviser deems such reallocation necessary to the performance of the Fund as a whole.) Sub-advisers may manage more or less than other sub-advisers of the Fund, depending on their performance. It is expected that, when new sub-advisers are retained to replace departing sub-advisers, the sub-adviser assets of the new sub-advisers would be those assets previously managed by the departing sub-advisers (which may be less or more than other sub-advisers of the Fund), provided, however, that this general expectation is subject to the Adviser's discretion to re-allocate assets in the best interest of the Fund as whole. Thereafter, the new sub-adviser will receive an amount of the daily net flows (positive and negative) to and from the Fund equal to the other sub-advisers.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Guideline Review. Adviser shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the portfolio manager(s) at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event of a conflict between this Schedule 2 and the Quintara Funds' registration statement filed with the SEC, as amended and supplemented from time to time (collectively, the "Prospectus"), the term of the Prospectus shall govern.
Guideline Review. Atlanta Capital Management Company, LLC shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the client or its consultant at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate.
Guideline Review. The PSA and Oranga Tamariki commit tor reviewing the guidelines that support ‘’actual and reasonable costs’ while working away or travelling.
Guideline Review. Lend Lease Xxxxx shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the client or its consultant at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event of a conflict between this Schedule A and the Real Estate Securities Series' registration statement filed with the SEC, as amended and supplemented from time to time (collectively, the "Prospectus"), the term of the Prospectus shall govern. SCHEDULE B ---------- Current Allocation: ____ percent of the assets of the AssetMark Real Estate Securities Fund.
Guideline Review. Davis Selected Advisors, L.P. xxxll be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the client or its consultant at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate.
Guideline Review. Sub-Advisor shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the client or its consultant at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event of a conflict between this Schedule A and the Real Estate Securities Series’ registration statement filed with the SEC, as amended and supplemented from time to time (collectively, the “Prospectus”), the term of the Prospectus shall govern.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Guideline Review. Xxxx Xxxxxx shall be responsible for reviewing these guidelines with the client or its consultant at least annually to assure that they remain appropriate.

Related to Guideline Review

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Decision on Review A decision on review of a denied claim shall be made in the following manner:

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.