Hazard Ranking System Scoring Sample Clauses

Hazard Ranking System Scoring. The HRS is a numerical screening system used to prioritize sites for listing on the basis of data from the PA and SI and that is used to decide which sites should be proposed for inclusion on the NPL. Scoring is done using three factors related to risk and four pathways of exposure. The three risk factors are likelihood of release, characteristics of the waste and the people or sensitive environments affected by the release. To determine an HRS score for a site, EPA looks at migration pathways—how contamination moves in the environment. EPA examines four migration pathways:  Ground water that may be used for drinking waterSurface water (like rivers and lakes) used for drinking water and for plant and animal habitats  Soil that people may come in contact with or that can be absorbed lower in the food chain  Air that carries contaminants A site can score high on the HRS even if only one pathway score is high. Sites with a preliminary HRS score of 28.50 or greater are eligible for listing on the NPL. EPA may then propose sites that rank high enough on the HRS for listing on the NPL. Each state may also nominate a site for the NPL. Contaminated sites placed on the NPL may require long-term response under the CERCLA Remedial Program. Note that not all sites with a preliminary HRS score of 28.50 or above will be placed on the NPL. HRS scores do not determine the priority for funding of remedial investigations, because the information collected to develop HRS scores is not sufficient to determine either the extent of contamination or the appropriate response (if any) for a site. Moreover, the sites with the highest scores do not necessarily come to EPA’s attention first. EPA relies on more detailed studies in the RI/FS, which typically follows listing. NPL sites may be as small as a few thousand square feet or thousands of acres. Some are complex and highly contaminated, requiring many years to fully study the problem, develop a remedy and complete the cleanup. CERCLA Remedial Program Once a site is listed on the NPL, the EPA Remedial Program (Figure 2-3) (or the responsible party with oversight by EPA), typically conducts an RI/FS designed to define the extent of contamina- tion, estimate the risk to human health and the environment and evaluate effective remedial alter- natives to address the problem, consistent with the NCP. Federal agencies normally conduct their own RI/FSs at facilities under their jurisdiction, custody or control. A ROD normally is pr...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Hazard Ranking System Scoring

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • System Availability System Availability percentage is calculated as follows:  Total MinutesintheMonth −Downtime   System Availability%age =  Total MinutesintheMonth *100    System Availability SLA (“SLA”) 99.5% System Availability percentage during each Month for productive versions Credit 2% of Monthly Subscription Fees for each 1% below SLA, not to exceed 100% of Monthly Subscription Fees Excluded Downtime Total Minutes in the Month attributable to: (i) a Scheduled Downtime for which a Regular Maintenance Window is described in Section 4 below, or (ii) any other Scheduled Downtime according to Section 4 for which the customer has been notified at least five (5) business days prior to such Scheduled Downtime or (iii) unavailability caused by factors outside of SAP’s reasonable control, such as unpredictable and unforeseeable events that could not have been avoided even if reasonable care had been exercised. Scheduled Downtime Scheduled Downtime for the applicable Cloud Services to which customer has subscribed is set forth in Section 4 below entitled “Maintenance Windows for Cloud Services”.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT.

  • Maintenance Manual No later than 60 (sixty) days prior to the Project Completion Date, the Contractor shall, in consultation with the Authority’s Engineer, evolve a maintenance manual (the “Maintenance Manual”) for the regular and preventive maintenance of the Project Highway in conformity with the Specifications and Standards, safety requirements and Good Industry Practice, and shall provide 5 (five) copies thereof to the Authority’s Engineer. The Authority’s Engineer shall review the Maintenance Manual within 15 (fifteen) days of its receipt and communicate its comments to the Contractor for necessary modifications, if any.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Engineer Payment of Subproviders No later than ten (10) days after receiving payment from the State, the Engineer shall pay all subproviders for work performed under a subcontract authorized hereunder. The State may withhold all payments that have or may become due if the Engineer fails to comply with the ten-day payment requirement. The State may also suspend the work under this contract or any work authorization until subproviders are paid. This requirement also applies to all lower tier subproviders, and this provision must be incorporated into all subcontracts.

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.