Horizontal adjustment Sample Clauses

Horizontal adjustment. The cut-off line shall be so positioned that the projected beam pattern appears approximately symmetrical to the v-v line. When the front fog lamp is designed for use in pairs or has otherwise an asymmetric beam pattern, it shall be horizontally aligned according to the specification of the applicant, or otherwise in such a way that the cut-off line appears symmetrical to the v-v line.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Horizontal adjustment. The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: a) The "0.2 D line" method (see figure 2 below). A single horizontal line at 0.2° D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2 D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure 2 V H H
Sample 1Sample 2See All (8)
Horizontal adjustment the beam with the "cut-off" line shall be so positioned that the projected beam pattern appears approximately symmetrical to the V-V line.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Horizontal adjustment. The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2 D line" method (see Figure A5-III). A single horizontal line at 0.2° D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2 D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure A5-III (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure A5-IV) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2° D to 2° U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula: G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°))
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
Horizontal adjustment. 2.3.2.1. Horizontal adjustment of passing-beam headlamp designed to provide asymmetric “cut-off” line The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2°D line" method (see Figure A6-III). A single horizontal line at 0.2°D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2°D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure A6-III Instrumental vertical and horizontal adjustment for asymmetric “cut-off” line- horizontal line scan method Note: The scales are different for vertical and horizontal lines. (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure A5-IV) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2°D to 2°U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula: G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°))
Sample 1Sample 2
Horizontal adjustment. The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2 D line" method (see Figure 2 below). A single horizontal line at 0.2° D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. Figure 2 The inflection point found on the 0.2 D line shall be positioned on the line A. (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure 3) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2° D to 2° U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula:
Sample 1

Related to Horizontal adjustment

  • Post-Closing Adjustment (a) Within ninety (90) days after the Closing Date, Parent shall prepare and deliver to Representative a statement (the “Closing Statement”) calculating (i) the Purchase Price (excluding any Earn-out Payments), (ii) the Net Working Capital as of the Effective Time (the “Closing Net Working Capital”), and (iii) the Indebtedness of the Company as of the Effective Time (the “Closing Indebtedness”). (b) If Representative disputes any amounts as shown on the Closing Statement, Representative shall deliver to Parent within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Closing Statement a notice (the “Dispute Notice”) setting forth Representative’s calculation of such amount and describing in reasonable detail the basis for the determination of such different amount. Any amounts not subject to the Dispute Notice shall be paid promptly pursuant to Section 2.11(c). If Representative does not deliver a Dispute Notice to Parent within such thirty (30) day period, then the Closing Statement prepared and delivered by Parent shall be deemed to be the “Final Closing Statement.” The Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such differences within a period of thirty (30) days after Representative has given the Dispute Notice. If the Parties resolve such differences, then the Closing Statement agreed to by the Parties shall be deemed to be the Final Closing Statement. If Parent and Representative do not reach a final resolution on the Closing Statement within thirty (30) days after Representative has given the Dispute Notice, unless Parent and Representative mutually agree to continue their efforts to resolve such differences, the Neutral Accountant shall resolve such differences, pursuant to an engagement agreement among Parent, Representative and the Neutral Accountant (which Parent and Representative agree to execute promptly), in the manner provided below. The Neutral Accountant shall only decide the specific items under dispute by the Parties (the “Disputed Items”), solely in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Parent and Representative shall each be entitled to make a presentation to the Neutral Accountant, pursuant to procedures to be agreed to among Parent, Representative and the Neutral Accountant (or, if they cannot agree on such procedures, pursuant to procedures determined by the Neutral Accountant), regarding such Party’s determination of the amounts to be set forth on the Closing Statement; and the Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Neutral Accountant to resolve the differences between Parent and Representative and determine the amounts to be set forth on the Closing Statement within twenty (20) days after the engagement of the Neutral Accountant. The Neutral Accountant’s determination shall be based solely on such presentations of the Parties (i.e., not on independent review) and on the definitions and other terms included herein. The Closing Statement determined by the Neutral Accountant shall be deemed to be the Final Closing Statement. Such determination by the Neutral Accountant shall be conclusive and binding upon the Parties, absent Fraud or manifest error. The fees and expenses of the Neutral Accountant shall be paid by the Party whose calculation of the Closing Net Working Capital is farther from the Neutral Accountant’s calculation thereof. Nothing in this Section 2.11(b) shall be construed to authorize or permit the Neutral Accountant to: (i) determine any questions or matters whatsoever under or in connection with this Agreement except for the resolution of differences between Parent and Representative regarding the determination of the Final Closing Statement; or (ii) resolve any such differences by making an adjustment to the Closing Statement that is outside of the range defined by amounts as finally proposed by Parent and Representative. (c) Promptly, but no later than five (5) Business Days after the final determination thereof, if the Purchase Price (excluding any Earn-out Payments) set forth in the Final Closing Statement: (i) exceeds the Closing Consideration, Parent shall pay such excess amount to Sellers in the form of Parent Shares; or (ii) is less than the Closing Consideration, then such difference shall be paid to the Parent in cash out of the Escrow Account; provided, however, that if the Escrow Account is insufficient to pay the Parent such difference, each Seller shall pay its Pro Rata Share of the aggregate deficiency amount in cash. Any payments made pursuant to this Section 2.11 shall be treated as an adjustment to the Purchase Price by the Parties. For the purposes hereof the number of Parent Shares to be issued or any decrease in the issuance thereof will be equal to the amount of the excess (in the case of item (i) of this subsection (c)) divided by the value of a Consideration Share hereunder.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!