Interregional Project Recommendation Process Sample Clauses

Interregional Project Recommendation Process. Section 9.3.3.5.1
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interregional Project Recommendation Process. Interregional Project(s) identified in the Coordinated System Plan study will be evaluated by each Party through its respective regional processes and analyses. If both Parties determine a proposed Interregional Project(s) is beneficial to their respective region by satisfying the respective regional criteria and the criteria in Section 9.6.3 then the Interregional Project(s) and associated interregional cost allocation will be voted on by the JPC. If the JPC approves an Interregional Project(s), it will then be included in the respective regional transmission plans of the Parties and will be presented to the respective Parties’ Board of Directors for approval and implementation. In accordance with Section 9.1.1.3, the JPC may vote to grant one or both of the Parties additional time for regional evaluations or approval of a proposed Interregional Project(s). Approval of an Interregional Project(s) by each Party’s Board of Directors is required for the Interregional Project to qualify for interregional cost allocation. If a proposed Interregional Project(s) and associated cost allocation is not approved by the Parties within six (6) months of the JPC vote or any JPC approved extension, the proposed Interregional Project is deemed rejected. A rejected Interregional Project may be reevaluated and recommended by the JPC as part of a future Coordinated System Plan study. The JPC shall inform the IPSAC of the outcome of each Party’s regional evaluation of a proposed Interregional Project(s) and its respective cost allocation. Section 9.3.3.5.1
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Interregional Project Recommendation Process. Interregional Project(s) identified in the Coordinated System Plan study will be evaluated by each Party through its respective regional processes and analyses. If both Parties determine a proposed Interregional Project(s) is beneficial to their respective region by satisfying the respective regional criteria and the criteria in Section 9.6.3 then the Interregional Project(s) and associated interregional cost allocation will be voted on by the JPC. If the JPC approves an Interregional Project(s), it will then be included in the respective regional transmission plans of the Parties and will be presented to the respective Parties’ Board of Directors for approval and implementation. In accordance with Section 9.1.1.3, the JPC may vote to grant one or both of the Parties additional time for regional evaluations or approval of a proposed Interregional Project(s). Approval of an Interregional Project(s) by each Party’s Board of Directors is required for the Interregional Project to qualify for interregional cost allocation. If a proposed Interregional Project(s) and associated cost allocation is not approved by the Parties within six (6) months of the JPC vote or any JPC approved extension, the proposed Interregional Project is deemed rejected. A rejected Interregional Project may be reevaluated and recommended by the JPC as part of a future Coordinated System Plan study. The JPC shall inform the IPSAC of the outcome of each Party’s regional evaluation of a proposed Interregional Project(s) and its respective cost allocation. At the completion of the Coordinated System Plan study, the JPC shall produce a draft report documenting the Coordinated System Plan study, including the Transmission Issues evaluated, studies performed, solutions considered, and, if applicable, the recommended Interregional Projects with the associated interregional cost allocation. The JPC shall provide the draft Coordinated System Plan study report to the IPSAC for review. The report will provide explanation for why any transmission solutions studied in the CSP were not recommended as Interregional Projects. The IPSAC will provide feedback on a draft report and a recommendation on any proposed Interregional Project(s) to the JPC as determined by an IPSAC vote, in accordance with Section 9.1.2.3.
Sample 1

Related to Interregional Project Recommendation Process

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.