Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments Sample Clauses

Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement or any such other agreement or plan, if any portion of the Total Payments (as defined below) would constitute an Excess Parachute Payment (as defined below) and therefore would be nondeductible to the Company by reason of the operation of Code Section 280G relating to golden parachute payments and/or would be subject to the golden parachute excise tax (“Excise Tax”) by reason of Section 4999 of the Code, then the full amount of the Total Payments shall not be provided to you and you shall instead receive the Reduced Total Payments (as defined below). If the Total Payments must be reduced to the Reduced Total Payments, the reduction shall occur in the following order: (1) reduction of cash payments for which the full amount is treated as a Parachute Payment; (2) cancellation of accelerated vesting (or, if necessary, payment) of cash awards for which the full amount is not treated as a parachute payment; (3) cancellation of any accelerated vesting of equity awards; and (4) reduction of any continued employee benefits. In selecting the equity awards (if any) for which vesting will be reduced under clause (3) of the preceding sentence, awards shall be selected in a manner that maximizes the after-tax aggregate amount of Reduced Total Payments provided to you, provided that if (and only if) necessary in order to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code, awards instead shall be selected in the reverse order of the date of grant. For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of measuring an equity compensation award’s value to you when performing the determinations under the preceding paragraph, such award’s value shall equal the then aggregate fair market value of the vested shares underlying the award less any aggregate exercise price less applicable taxes. Also, if two or more equity awards are granted on the same date, each award will be reduced on a pro-rata basis. In no event shall (i) you have any discretion with respect to the ordering of payment reductions or (ii) the Company be required to gross up any payment or benefit to you to avoid the effects of the Excise Tax or to pay any regular or excise taxes arising from the application of the Excise Tax. All mathematical determinations and all determinations of whether any of the Total Payments are Parachute Payments that are required to be made under this Section shall be made by a nationally recognized independent audit firm ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation to make payment of any severance benefits as provided herein (including, without limitation, any payments due Executive under Section 5, and, to the extent incurred after termination, legal fees and expenses covered by Section 13) is conditioned upon compliance with applicable law, including 12 C.F.R. Part 359. In addition, Executive covenants and agrees that the Corporation and the Bank and their successors and assigns shall have the right to demand the return of any “golden parachute payments” (as defined in 12 C.F.R. Part 359) in the event that any of them obtain information indicating that Executive committed, is substantially responsible for, or has violated, the respective acts or omissions, conditions, or offenses contained in 12 C.F.R. §359.4(a)(4), and Executive shall promptly return any such “golden parachute payment” upon such demand.
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation to make payment of any severance benefits as provided herein (including, without limitation, any payments due Executive under Section 5 or Section 6 and, to the extent incurred after termination, legal fees and expenses covered by Section 16), is conditioned upon (i) the Corporation and the Bank obtaining any necessary approvals from each of their primary regulators (including, where applicable, FDIC concurrence), and (ii) compliance with applicable law, including 12 C.F.R. Part 359. In addition, Executive covenants and agrees that the Corporation and the Bank and their successors and assigns shall have the right to demand the return of any “golden parachute payments” (as defined in 12 C.F.R. Part 359) in the event that any of them obtain information indicating that the Employee committed, is substantially responsible for, or has violated, the respective acts or omissions, conditions, or offenses contained in 12 C.F.R. §359.4(a)(4), and Executive shall promptly return any such “golden parachute payment” upon such demand.
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation to make payment of any severance benefits as provided herein (including, without limitation, any payments due Executive under Section 5 or Section 6, and, to the extent incurred after termination, legal fees and expenses covered by Section 16) is conditioned upon (i) the Corporation and the Bank obtaining any necessary approvals from each of their primary regulators (including, where applicable, FDIC concurrence), and (ii) compliance with applicable law, including 12 C.F.R. Part 359. The Corporation and the Bank covenant and agree to diligently pursue the regulatory approvals described in the prior sentence. In addition, Executive covenants and agrees that the Corporation and the Bank and their successors and assigns shall have the right to demand the return of any “golden parachute payments” (as defined in 12 C.F.R. Part 359) in the event that any of them obtain information indicating that Executive committed, is substantially responsible for, or has violated, the respective acts or omissions, conditions, or offenses contained in 12 C.F.R. §359.4(a)(4), and Executive shall promptly return any such “golden parachute payment” upon such demand. The Corporation and the Bank represent that the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Corporation and the Bank have been approved by the applicable bank regulatory agencies as required by applicable law, including 12 C.F.R. Part 359.
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Any other provision of this Paragraph 9 notwithstanding, if the Excise Tax could be avoided by reducing the Total Payments by $100,000 or less, then the Total Payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the Excise Tax and no Gross-Up Payment will be made. If the Accounting Firm determines that the Total Payments are to be reduced under the preceding sentence, then the Company will promptly give you notice to that effect and a copy of the detailed calculation thereof. You may then elect, in your sole discretion, which and how much of the Total Payments are to be eliminated or reduced (as long as after such election no Excise Tax will be payable), and you will advise the Company in writing of your election within five business days of receipt of notice. If you make no such election within such five-day period, then the Company may elect which and how much of the Total Payments are to be eliminated or reduced (as long as after such election no Excise Tax will be payable), and it will notify you promptly of such election.
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation to make payment of any severance payments or benefits as provided herein (including, without limitation, any payments due Executive under Section 5 or Section 6, and, to the extent incurred after termination, legal fees and expenses covered by Section 16) is conditioned upon (i) the Corporation and the Bank obtaining any necessary approvals from each of their primary regulators (including, where applicable, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) concurrence), and (ii) compliance with applicable law, including 12 C.F.R. Part 359. The Corporation and the Bank covenant and agree to diligently pursue the regulatory approvals described in the prior sentence. In addition, Executive covenants and agrees that the Corporation and the Bank and their successors and assigns shall have the right to demand the return of any “golden parachute payments” (as defined in 12 C.F.R. Part 359) in the event that any of them obtain information indicating that Executive committed, is substantially responsible for, or has violated, the respective acts or omissions, conditions, or offenses contained in 12 C.F.R. §359.4(a)(4), and Executive shall promptly return any such “golden parachute payment” upon such demand.
Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Limitation on Golden Parachute Payments

  • Golden Parachute Limitation Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amount to be paid or benefit to be provided to the Executive pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise (collectively, the “Payments”) would be treated as an “excess parachute payment,” as that phrase is defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), then the Payments shall be either: (a) paid or allowed in full; or (b) reduced (but not below zero) to the Reduced Amount, whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account the applicable federal, state and local income, employment and excise taxes (including, without limitation, the excise tax imposed upon the Executive under Section 4999 of the Code) results in the Executive’s receipt on an after tax basis of the greater amount of Payments. For purposes of this section, the “Reduced Amount” shall be an amount expressed in present value which maximizes the aggregate present value of all Payments without causing any Payment to be nondeductible by the Company because of Section 280G of the Code or subjecting the Executive to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. The Company may elect which and how much of the Payments shall be eliminated or reduced and shall notify the Executive promptly of such election. Any determination required under this Section 3 will be made in writing by the Company’s legal counsel or independent public accountants immediately prior to a Change of Control or such other person or entity which the Company may select in its sole discretion (the “Firm”), whose determination will be conclusive and binding upon the Executive and the Company. For purposes of making the calculations required by this Section 3, the Firm may make reasonable assumptions and approximations concerning applicable taxes and may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations concerning the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code. The Company and the Executive will furnish to the Firm such information and documents as the Firm may reasonably request in order to make a determination under this Section. The Company will bear all costs charged by the Firm in connection with any calculations contemplated by this Section 3.

  • Excess Parachute Payments Limitation on Payments (a) Best Pay Cap. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in the event that any payment or benefit received or to be received by the Executive (including any payment or benefit received in connection with a termination of the Executive’s employment, whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or any other plan, arrangement or agreement) (all such payments and benefits, including the payments and benefits under Section 4 hereof, being hereinafter referred to as the “Total Payments”) would be subject (in whole or part) to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”) then, if elected by the Executive, after taking into account any reduction in the Total Payments provided by reason of Section 280G of the Code in such other plan, arrangement or agreement, any cash payments shall first be reduced, and any noncash payments shall thereafter be reduced, to the extent necessary so that no portion of the Total Payments is subject to the Excise Tax but only if (i) the net amount of such Total Payments, as so reduced (and after subtracting the net amount of federal, state and local income taxes on such reduced Total Payments and after taking into account the phase out of itemized deductions and personal exemptions attributable to such reduced Total Payments) is greater than or equal to (ii) the net amount of such Total Payments without such reduction (but after subtracting the net amount of federal, state and local income taxes on such Total Payments and the amount of Excise Tax to which the Executive would be subject in respect of such unreduced Total Payments and after taking into account the phase out of itemized deductions and personal exemptions attributable to such unreduced Total Payments).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.