Lowest Evaluated Tender Sample Clauses

Lowest Evaluated Tender. 38.1 Having compared the evaluated prices of Tenders, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. The Lowest Evaluated Tender is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the Qualification Criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) most responsive to the Tender document; and b) the lowest evaluated price.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (168)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Lowest Evaluated Tender. 36.1 Having compared the evaluated prices of Tenders, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. The Lowest Evaluated Tender is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the Qualification Criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) most responsive to the Tender document; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 37. Procuring Entity's Right to Accept Any Tender, and to Reject Any or All Tenders. 37.1 The Procuring Entity reserves the right to accept or reject any Tender, and to annul the Tendering process and reject all Tenders at any time prior to notification Award, without thereby incurring any liability to Tenderers. In case of annulment, all Tenderers shall be notified with reasons and all Tenders submitted and specifically, tender securities, shall be promptly returned to the Tenderers.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Lowest Evaluated Tender. Procuring Entity's Right to Accept Any Tender, and to Reject Any or All Tenders. 31 40. Award Criteria 31 41. Procuring Entity's Right to Vary Quantities at Time of Award ................................... 42. Notice of Intention to enter into a Contract ................................................................. 31 43.Standstill Period .......................................................................................................... 32 44.Debriefing by the Procuring Entity 32 45.Letter of Award 32 46. Signing of Contract ................................................................................................ 32 47. Performance Security 33 48. Publication of Procurement Contract 33 49. Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review ................................... 33
Sample 1Sample 2
Lowest Evaluated Tender. 38.1 Having compared the evaluated prices of Tenders, the County Government of Narok shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. The Lowest Evaluated Tender is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the Qualification Criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) most responsive to the Tender document; and b) the lowest evaluated price.
Sample 1
Lowest Evaluated Tender. 38.1 Having evaluated all requirements and prices of Tenders, MCG shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. Successful Bidders that meets the Qualification Criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) most responsive to the Tender document; and b) the lowest evaluated price.
Sample 1
Lowest Evaluated Tender. 38.1 HavingcomparedtheevaluatedpricesofTenders,The County Government 0f Bungoma, Through The Department of Health And Sanitation shalldeterminetheLowestEvaluatedTender.TheLowestEvaluatedTenderistheTenderoftheTend ererthatmeetstheQualificationCriteriaandwhoseTenderhasbeendeterminedtobe: a) mostresponsivetotheTenderdocument;and b) the lowestevaluatedprice.
Sample 1

Related to Lowest Evaluated Tender

  • Tender Price The total price of our Tender, excluding any discounts offered in item (f) below is:

  • Abnormally High Tenders 36.4 An abnormally high price is one where the tender price, in combination with other constituent elements of the Tender, appears unreasonably too high to the extent that the Procuring Entity is concerned that it (the Procuring Entity) may not be getting value for money or it may be paying too high a price for the contract compared with market prices or that genuine competition between Tenderers is compromised. 36.5 In case of an abnormally high tender price, the Procuring Entity shall make a survey of the market prices, check if the estimated cost of the contract is correct and review the Tender Documents to check if the specifications, scope of work and conditions of contract are contributory to the abnormally high tenders. The Procuring Entity may also seek written clarification from the tenderer on the reason for the high tender price. The Procuring Entity shall proceed as follows: i) If the tender price is abnormally high based on wrong estimated cost of the contract, the Procuring Entity may accept or not accept the tender depending on the Procuring Entity's budget considerations. ii) If specifications, scope of work and/or conditions of contract are contributory to the abnormally high tender prices, the Procuring Entity shall reject all tenders and may retender for the contract based on revised estimates, specifications, scope of work and conditions of contract, as the case may be. 36.6 If the Procuring Entity determines that the Tender Price is abnormally too high because genuine competition between tenderers is compromised (often due to collusion, corruption or other manipulations), the Procuring Entity shall reject all Tenders and shall institute or cause relevant Government Agencies to institute an investigation on the cause of the compromise, before retendering.

  • Bilingual Differential When formally assigned in the employee’s position description, an employee assigned to interpret to or from another language to English will receive a differential of five percent (5%) of base pay.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!