Main Results of Public Sample Clauses

Main Results of Public. Consultation Subproject 2 The environmental approval process has been started, and the public consultations has been already completed for subproject 2, and the minutes of the relevant field visits/meetings/discussions and the attendance sheets are attached as Annex 1 & 2. Although a number of issues raised by the stakeholders/DSs/village leaders (GNs) etc., has been discussed and agreed upon by CEB (as shown in the minutes), no changes to the selected line route was proposed. Subproject 3 Among the transmission lines included in subproject 3, the environmental approval process including public consultations for Ukuwela-Pallekelle transmission line has been completed in 2006. The Environmental Approval was granted and the transmission line trace (mentioned in this RP) was finalized subsequent to the said public consultation. The minutes of the relevant field visits/meetings/discussions and the attendance sheets are attached as Annex 3 and 4. Although a number of issues raised by the stakeholders/DSs/village leaders (GNs) etc., has been discussed and agreed upon by CEB (as shown in the minutes), no changes to the selected line route was proposed. The environmental approval process for all the other transmission lines included in this subproject have already been started. Public consultation / field inspection for proposed Galle – Matara transmission line has been held on 28th and 29th February 2008. The minutes of the meeting / discussion and attendance sheet is attached as Annex 5 & 6 respectively. A summary of the main issues discussed and agreed are given below. • Soil excavated from the pits for the tower foundations in xxxxx xxxxxx should be removed away in order to avoid adverse effects to the top soil. • Proposed line route crosses the southern highway in more than three places and adequate clearance has to be provided to the highway with the consultation of the Road Development Authority. • Proposed line route passes through Kirelakelle area for a short distance (where the existing Matara grid substation is already located), which may be declared as a protected area in future by Dept. of Wildlife Conservation. Views of Department of Wildlife Conservation has to be obtained in construction of the line. Although a number of issues raised by the stakeholders/DSs/Grama Niladaris etc., has been discussed and agreed upon by CEB(as highlighted in the minutes), no changes to the selected line route was proposed. Public consultation / field inspection for pr...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Main Results of Public

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Termination and Results of Termination 24.1. Without prejudice to the Company’s rights under this Agreement to terminate it immediately without prior notice to the Client, each Party may terminate this Agreement by giving at least three (3) Business Days Written Notice to the other Party.

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Financial Conditions Section 4.01. (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained a financial management system, including records and accounts, and prepare financial statements in a format acceptable to the Bank, adequate to reflect the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project and each Sub-project (including its cost and the benefits to be derived from it).

  • SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The interim financial statements are prepared by using the same accounting policies and methods of computation as were used for the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, except the changes in accounting policies as follows.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.