MEPS Panel 15 Weight Sample Clauses

MEPS Panel 15 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 15 was developed using the MEPS Round 1 person- level weight as a “base” weight. For key, in-scope RU members who joined an RU after Round 1, the Round 1 family weight served as a “base” weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Round 2 and the 2010 portion of Round 3 as well as raking to the same population control figures for December 2010 used for the MEPS Panel 14 weights. The same five variables employed for Panel 14 raking (census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age) were used for Panel 15 raking. Again, the final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment. Note that the MEPS Round 1 weights incorporated the following components: the original household probability of selection for the NHIS; ratio-adjustment to NHIS-based national population estimates at the household (occupied dwelling unit) level; adjustment for nonresponse at the dwelling unit level for Round 1; and poststratification to figures at the family and person level obtained from the March CPS data base of the corresponding year (i.e., 2009 for Panel 14 and 2010 for Panel 15).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MEPS Panel 15 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 15 was developed using the 2010 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2010. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU sometime in 2011 after being out-of-scope in 2010, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2010 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for person-level nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control totals for December 2011 for key, responding persons in-scope on December 31, 2011. These control totals were derived by scaling back the population distribution obtained from the March 2012 CPS to reflect the December 31, 2011 estimated population total (estimated based on Census projections for January 1, 2011). Variables used for person-level raking included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non- MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic; Black, non-Hispanic; Asian, non-Hispanic; and other); sex; education level; and age. (Poverty status is not included in this version of the MEPS full year database because of the time required to process the income data collected and then assign persons to a poverty status category). The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2011 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment. It may be noted that the Panel 15 weights reflect additional adjustments not typically implemented in MEPS weights. Additional raking dimensions were added when PERWT10F was being developed, reflecting MEPS 2008-09 estimated average annual distributions of office- based visits and care from home health agencies by age. More details can be found in the MEPS PUF documentation for the 2010 Full Year Consolidated Data file (HC-138).
Sample 1See All (6)
MEPS Panel 15 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 15 was developed using the 2010 MEPS Round 1 person-level weight as a “base” weight. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU after Round 1, the Round 1 family weight served as a “base” weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over the remaining data collection rounds in 2010 as well as raking to the same population control figures for December 2010 used for the MEPS Panel 14 weights for key, responding persons inscope on December 31, 2010. The same five variables employed for Panel 14 raking (census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age) were used for Panel 15 raking. Again, the final weight for key, responding persons who were not in- scope on December 31, 2010 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment. Note that the MEPS Round 1 weights incorporated the following components: the original household probability of selection for the NHIS; ratio-adjustment to NHIS-based national population estimates at the household (occupied dwelling unit) level; adjustment for nonresponse at the dwelling unit level for Round 1; and poststratification to figures at the family and person level obtained from the March CPS data base of the corresponding year (i.e., 2009 for Panel 14 and 2010 for Panel 15).
Sample 1
MEPS Panel 15 Weight. The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 15 was developed using the 2010 full year weight for an individual as a “base” weight for survey participants present in 2010. For key, in-scope members who joined an RU some time in 2011 after being out-of-scope in 2010, the initially assigned person-level weight was the corresponding 2010 family weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for person-level nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as raking to population control figures for December 2011 for key, responding persons in-scope on December 31, 2011. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population distribution obtained from the March 2011 CPS to reflect the December 31, 2011 estimated population total (estimated based on Census projections for January 1, 2011). Variables used for person-level raking included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, Black but non-Hispanic, Asian but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; education level; and age. The final weight for key, responding persons who were not in-scope on December 31, 2011 but were in-scope earlier in the year was the person weight after the nonresponse adjustment.
Sample 1

Related to MEPS Panel 15 Weight

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • CFR 200 328. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.

  • Weight The percent of the Base Price subject to adjustment based on an index change.

  • Target Population TREATMENT FOR ADULT (TRA) Target Population

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Check Meters Developer, at its option and expense, may install and operate, on its premises and on its side of the Point of Interconnection, one or more check meters to check Connecting Transmission Owner’s meters. Such check meters shall be for check purposes only and shall not be used for the measurement of power flows for purposes of this Agreement, except as provided in Article 7.4 below. The check meters shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and examination by Connecting Transmission Owner or its designee. The installation, operation and maintenance thereof shall be performed entirely by Developer in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Weights light, moderate and heavy, have their normal everyday meanings, and are to be applied consistently, regardless of the physical characteristics of the jobholder and whether the duties are normally carried out by women or by men; or by small people or large people; or by fit or unfit people. So, a sack of cement or a sack of potatoes is a heavy weight, even if it is lifted and carried without obvious exertion by a tall, fit, young person.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!