Multi-Level Human Brain Atlas Sample Clauses

Multi-Level Human Brain Atlas. The aim is to develop a prototype of a Human Brain Atlas in collaboration with SP5 and SP7. The atlas will be constituted by several widely accepted template spaces, a set of nonlinear spatial voxel-to-voxel mappings between them and a collection of high-quality 3D image datasets, as well as 3D parcellations generated in SP2, representing structure, connectivity and function. To achieve this goal, novel image alignment methods that bridge scales, modalities and inter-individual variability will be developed. Another aim is to generate novel label propagation methods that will make SP2’s contribution relevant to mining image data in SP8 (Medical Informatics). This would also allow the wider scientific community to project atlas data onto their own scans via the Collaboratory. To allow for continuous enrichment of the atlas, mature image-processing and big data analytics tools will be implemented as efficient HPC production workflows in collaboration with SP7. These workflows will provide anatomically consistent 3D volumes, as well as quantitative data anchored in their respective atlases. Principal Subprojects: XX0, XX0, XX0, XX0, XX0, SP8.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Multi-Level Human Brain Atlas

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Level Five Binding Arbitration (Any grievance filed on or after July 1, 2006)

  • DNS name server availability Refers to the ability of a public-­‐DNS registered “IP address” of a particular name server listed as authoritative for a domain name, to answer DNS queries from an Internet user. All the public DNS-­‐registered “IP address” of all name servers of the domain name being monitored shall be tested individually. If 51% or more of the DNS testing probes get undefined/unanswered results from “DNS tests” to a name server “IP address” during a given time, the name server “IP address” will be considered unavailable.

  • EPP service availability Refers to the ability of the TLD EPP servers as a group, to respond to commands from the Registry accredited Registrars, who already have credentials to the servers. The response shall include appropriate data from the Registry System. An EPP command with “EPP command RTT” 5 times higher than the corresponding SLR will be considered as unanswered. If 51% or more of the EPP testing probes see the EPP service as unavailable during a given time, the EPP service will be considered unavailable.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Level Four Arbitration

  • Level 3 If the grievant is not satisfied with the written answer from the appointing authority, the grievant may, within ten (10) days of such answer, file a written appeal to the Director of Human Resources. Within ten (10) days of receipt of the written appeal, the Director of Human Resources or his/her designee shall investigate the grievance, which shall include a meeting with the concerned parties, unless such meeting is waived by mutual agreement of the parties, and thereafter shall give a written answer to the grievant within ten (10) days, which answer shall be final and binding unless appealed by the Association.

  • Level 4 An Employee at this level performs work above and beyond the skills of an Employee at Level 3.

  • Leverage The Fund has no liability for borrowed money or under any reverse repurchase agreement.

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.