No Viable Alternatives Sample Clauses

No Viable Alternatives. County has considered alternatives to requiring Franchisees to deliver Solid Waste to a Solid Waste facility owned by County or, alternatively, paying the Capacity Fee for limited out-of- county hauling, but has found that there are no viable alternatives. (i) County’s ability to subsidize solid waste management through additional taxes or property-based fees is constrained practically and under the State constitution. (ii) County has the power, authority, and direction to establish diversion performance standards at its own Solid Waste facility or facilities. It cannot establish, implement, or enforce those standards at facilities it does not own, including landfills where some Solid Waste generated in Mono County is presently being disposed. (iii) Even if County could raise the capital to take over Solid Waste collection from present privately provided services to municipal service, which would allow County to deliver waste to its own Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials management system, under State law, it would be required to give private haulers five (5) years’ advance notice of its intent to do so. During those five (5) years, the private haulers would have the continued right to provide service, and the present loss of County gate fee income would continue to imperil County’s Solid Waste program. (iv) Due to its rural character and remote location, it is impractical or impossible to require mandatory collection within Mono County and many County residents continue to self-haul to County’s landfill or transfer stations. If those facilities ceased operation as a result of the failure to collect sufficient gate fee revenues to maintain them, then County residents and businesses would be faced with, in many cases, more than a 100-mile drive to dispose of their waste or would be forced to subscribe to Solid Waste Collection services to haul that waste for them. This would likely increase instances of illegal dumping, as well as be impractical for the reasons described in Subsection (b)(v) below. In addition, it would deprive those residents and businesses of the recycling and Unpermitted Waste processing services which are now available at County’s facilities. (v) User generation fees are not an alternative source of County funding. County has many rural areas, resulting in routing and collection inefficiencies for commercial waste haulers that can make collection cost at many remote residences prohibitively expensive for residents of limited financial...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to No Viable Alternatives

  • Alternatives The Redeployment Committee or where there is no consensus, the committee members shall propose alternatives to cutbacks in staffing to the Hospital's Chief Executive Officer and to the Board of Directors. At the time of submitting any plan concerning rationalization of services and involving the elimination of any position(s) or any layoff(s) to the District Health Council or to the Ministry of Health, the Hospital shall provide a copy, together with accompanying documentation, to the Union.

  • Loss Mitigation and Consideration of Alternatives (i) For each Single Family Shared-Loss Loan in default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution shall undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts, in accordance with any of the following programs selected by Assuming Institution in its sole discretion, Exhibit 5 (FDIC Mortgage Loan Modification Program), the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program Guidelines or any other modification program approved by the United States Treasury Department, the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental agency (it being understood that the Assuming Institution can select different programs for the various Single Family Shared-Loss Loans) (such program chosen, the “Modification Guidelines”). After selecting the applicable Modification Guideline for each such Single Family Shared-Loss Loan, the Assuming Institution shall document its consideration of foreclosure, loan restructuring under the applicable Modification Guideline chosen, and short-sale (if short-sale is a viable option) alternatives and shall select the alternative the Assuming Institution believes, based on its estimated calculations, will result in the least Loss. If unemployment or underemployment is the primary cause for default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution may consider the borrower for a temporary forbearance plan which reduces the loan payment to an affordable level for at least six (6) months. (ii) Losses on Home Equity Loans shall be shared under the charge-off policies of the Assuming Institution’s Examination Criteria as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iii) Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans shall be treated as Restructured Loans, and with the consent of the Receiver can be restructured under terms separate from the Exhibit 5 standards. Please refer to Exhibits 2(a)(1)-(2) for guidance in Calculation of Loss for Restructured Loans. Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans will be treated as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iv) The Assuming Institution shall retain its loss calculations for the Shared Loss Loans and such calculations shall be provided to the Receiver upon request. For the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Assuming Institution is not required to modify or restructure any Shared-Loss Loan on more than one occasion and (y) the Assuming Institution is not required to consider any alternatives with respect to any Shared-Loss Loan in the process of foreclosure as of the Bank Closing if the Assuming Institution can document that a loan modification is not cost effective and shall be entitled to continue such foreclosure measures and recover the Foreclosure Loss as provided herein, and (z) the Assuming Institution shall have a transition period of up to 90 days after Bank Closing to implement the Modification Guidelines, during which time, the Assuming Institution may submit claims under such guidelines as may be in place at the Failed Bank.

  • FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no budget implications. The applicant will be responsible for all costs, expenses, liabilities and obligations imposed under or incurred in order to satisfy the terms of this proposed development agreement. The administration of the proposed development agreement can be carried out within the approved 2019- 2020 budget and with existing resources.

  • Intended Audience This Website is directed to adults in the United States and Canada for business use, and is not intended for children under the age of 16.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than Quality and Cost-based Selection, which may be used for consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used. (a) Quality-based Selection (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget

  • Alternative Structure If following the date of this Agreement all of the conditions set forth in Article VI have been satisfied or waived (except that the tax representation letters in the forms as set forth in Exhibit B-1 and called for in Section 5.14 cannot be delivered and the condition set forth in Section 6.1(e) has not been waived), but the Closing could occur if the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 could be executed and delivered (assuming Parent alters the structure as hereafter provided in this Section 1.1(b)), Parent shall alter the structure of the business combination between Merger Sub and the Company contemplated by this Agreement, , by consummating a second-step merger of the Surviving Corporation into a limited liability company wholly-owned by Parent that is disregarded as an entity for federal tax purposes, in accordance with Delaware Law, immediately following the Merger (such second-step merger, the “Second Merger”); provided, however, that (i) such wholly-owned disregarded limited liability company shall become a party to, and shall become bound by, the terms of this Agreement and (ii) the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 shall be executed and delivered, and (iii) any action taken pursuant to this Section 1.1(b) shall not (unless consented to in writing by the Company prior to the Closing) (x) alter or change the kind or amount of consideration to be issued to the holders of the Company’s capital stock or other securities as provided for in this Agreement or (y) otherwise cause any closing condition set forth in Article VI not to be capable of being satisfied (unless duly waived by the party entitled to the benefits thereof). If such second-step merger occurs, references to the Merger in Recital I, Section 1.10, Section 2.6(b)(xiii), Section 4.1(b)(xviii), Section 5.14 and Section 6.1(e) shall be to the Merger and the second-step merger described in this Section 1.1(b), taken together as one integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Residence Life or the Director’s designee.

  • Preservation of Existence and Similar Matters Except as otherwise permitted under Section 9.4., the Borrower shall, and shall cause each other Loan Party and each other Subsidiary to, preserve and maintain its respective existence, rights, franchises, licenses and privileges in the jurisdiction of its incorporation or formation and qualify and remain qualified and authorized to do business in each jurisdiction in which the character of its properties or the nature of its business requires such qualification and authorization and where the failure to be so authorized and qualified could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements 38.1 Where the Employer wants to enter into a individual flexibility arrangement (IFA) it must provide a written proposal to the Employee. Where the Employee’s understanding of written English is limited, the Employer must take measures, including translation into an appropriate language, to ensure the Employee understands the proposal. 38.2 The Employer and an Employee covered by this Agreement may agree to make an IFA to vary the effect of terms of the Agreement if: (a) it deals with one or more of the following matters: (i) Time between which ordinary hours are worked; (ii) Salary sacrifice Agreements; (iii) Reduction in ordinary hours; (iv) Increase in annual leave accrual each year; (v) Increase in rate of accrual of Rostered days off; (vi) Increase in wages; (vii) Increase in training leave (Union or otherwise); (b) The IFA meets the genuine needs of the Employer and the Employee covered by this Agreement in relation to one or more of the matters mentioned in paragraph (a) above; and (c) The IFA is genuinely agreed to by the Employer and the Employee. 38.3 The Employer must ensure that the terms of the IFA: (a) are about permitted matters under section 172 of the FW Act; and (b) are not unlawful terms under section 194 of the FW Act; and (c) result in the Employee being better off overall than the Employee would be if no IFA was made. 38.4 The Employer must also ensure that any such IFA is: (a) in writing (including details of the terms that will be varied, how the IFA will vary the effect of the Enterprise Agreement terms, how the Employee will be better off overall in relation to the terms and conditions of his or her employment as a result of the IFA, and the day on which the IFA commences); (b) includes the name of the Employer and Employee; (c) signed by the Employer and the Employee, and if the Employee is under 18, by a parent or guardian of the Employee; and (d) provided to the Employee within 14 days after it is agreed to. 38.5 The Employer or Employee may terminate the IFA by either the Employer or Employee giving written notice of not more than 28 days, or at any time by both parties agreeing in writing. 38.6 Where any of the requirements of ss 202 and 203 of the FW Act are not met, the IFA is of no effect.

  • Existence; Compliance with Legal Requirements; Insurance Each Borrower and Operating Lessee shall do or cause to be done all things necessary to preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect its Entity existence, rights, licenses, Permits and franchises necessary for the conduct of its business and to comply or to initiate compliance in all material respects with all applicable Legal Requirements and Insurance Requirements applicable to it and each Individual Property. Each Borrower and Operating Lessee shall notify Lender promptly of any written notice or order that such Borrower or Operating Lessee receives from any Governmental Authority relating to such Borrower’s or Operating Lessee’s failure to comply with such applicable Legal Requirements relating to such Borrower’s or Operating Lessee’s applicable Individual Property and promptly take any and all actions necessary to bring its operations at such Individual Property into compliance with such applicable Legal Requirements (and shall fully comply with the requirements of such Legal Requirements that at any time are applicable to its operations at any Individual Property) provided, that such Borrower or Operating Lessee at its expense may, after prior notice to the Lender, contest by appropriate legal, administrative or other proceedings conducted in good faith and with due diligence, the validity or application, in whole or in part, of any such applicable Legal Requirements as long as (i) neither the applicable Collateral nor any part thereof or any interest therein, will be sold, forfeited or lost or subject to a continuing Lien if such Borrower or Operating Lessee pays the amount or satisfies the condition being contested, and such Borrower or Operating Lessee would have the opportunity to do so, in the event of such Borrower’s or Operating Lessee’s failure to prevail in the contest, (ii) Lender would not, by virtue of such permitted contest, be exposed to any risk of any civil liability or criminal liability, and (iii) such Borrower or Operating Lessee shall have furnished to the Lender additional security in respect of the claim being contested or the loss or damage that may result from such Borrower’s or Operating Lessee’s failure to prevail in such contest in such amount as may be reasonably requested by Lender but in no event less than one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the amount of such claim. Each Borrower and Operating Lessee shall at all times maintain, preserve and protect, or cause the maintenance, preservation and protection of, all franchises and trade names and preserve or cause the preservation of all the remainder of its property necessary for the continued conduct of its business and keep the applicable Individual Properties, or cause the same to be kept, in good repair, working order and condition, except for reasonable wear and use, and from time to time make, or cause to be made, all necessary repairs, renewals, replacements, betterments and improvements thereto, all as more fully provided in the Mortgages. Borrowers and Operating Lessee shall keep their Individual Properties insured at all times, as provided in the Mortgages.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!