Non-Compliance (Test Results) Sample Clauses

Non-Compliance (Test Results). Should any of the tests indicate that a material and/or system does not comply with the contract requirements, the burden of proving compliance remains with the Contractor. The tests are subject to the following conditions: 8.2.4.1 The Contractor’s selected laboratory must be acceptable to the Owner. 8.2.4.2 The quality and nature of the tests must be acceptable to the Owner. 8.2.4.3 All tests must be taken in the presence of the A/E and/or ODR, or their representatives. 8.2.4.4 If tests confirm that the material/systems comply with Contract Documents, the Owner will pay the cost of the test. 8.2.4.5 If tests reveal noncompliance, the Contractor will pay the laboratory fees and costs of that particular test and all future tests of that failing Work, necessary to eventually confirm compliance with Contract Documents. 8.2.4.6 Proof of noncompliance with the Contract Documents will make the Contractor liable for any corrective action which the ODR determines appropriate, including complete removal and replacement of non-compliant work or material.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Non-Compliance (Test Results). Should any of the tests indicate that a material and/or system does not comply with the Contract requirements, the burden of proof remains with Contractor, subject to: 11.2.4.1 Contractor selection and submission of the laboratory for Owner acceptance. 11.2.4.2 Acceptance by Owner of the quality and nature of tests. 11.2.4.3 All tests taken in the presence of Design Professional and/or OCM, or their representatives. 11.2.4.4 If tests confirm that the material/systems comply with Contract Documents, Owner will pay the cost of the test. 11.2.4.5 If tests reveal noncompliance, Contractor will pay those laboratory fees and costs of that particular test and all future tests, of that failing Work, necessary to eventually confirm compliance with Contract Documents. 11.2.4.6 Proof of noncompliance with the Contract Documents will make Contractor liable for any corrective action which OCM determines appropriate, including complete removal and replacement of noncompliant work or material.
Non-Compliance (Test Results). Should any of the tests indicate that a material and/or does not comply with the contract requirements, the burden of proof remains with the CM-at-Risk, subject to: 8.2.4.1 CM-at-Risk selection and submission of the laboratory for Owner acceptance. 8.2.4.2 Acceptance by the Owner of the quality and nature of tests. 8.2.4.3 All tests taken in the presence of the Architect/Engineer and/or ODR, or their representatives. 8.2.4.4 If tests confirm that the materials comply with Contract Documents, the Owner will pay the cost of the test. 8.2.4.5 If tests reveal noncompliance, the CM-at-Risk will pay those laboratory fees and costs of that particular test and all future tests, of that failing Work, necessary to eventually confirm compliance with Contract Documents. 8.2.4.6 Proof of noncompliance with the Contract Documents will make the CM-at-Risk liable for any corrective action which the ODR determines appropriate, including complete removal and replacement of noncompliant work or material.

Related to Non-Compliance (Test Results)

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act. (B) All classes covered by this Agreement are designated special risk classes for drug testing purposes. Special risk means employees who are required as a condition of employment to be certified under Chapter 633 or Chapter 943, F.S. (C) An employee shall have the right to grieve any disciplinary action taken under section 112.0455, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, subject to the limitations on the grievability of disciplinary actions in Article 10. If an employee is not disciplined but is denied a demotion, reassignment, or promotion as a result of a positive confirmed drug test, the employee shall have the right to grieve such action in accordance with Article 6.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!