NTPSM EVALUATION. 14.1 The evaluation of the work of all NTPSMs is a responsibility of the building principal. The building principal may designate an assistant principal, or the Special Education Coordinator, provided the designee has knowledge of the NTPSM’s subject area. The NTPSM will be notified by October 1 of the administrator who will be performing the evaluation. When a NTPSM works in more than one building, only one administrator may evaluate them. The other administrator(s) may have input. Central Office Administration also has the right to come in and observe and provide written feedback. 14.2 The form(s) to be used for NTPSM evaluation shall be those attached to this Agreement. 14.3 All written observations and evaluations made by the building principal or his/her designee shall be recorded and placed in the NTPSM’s personnel file. 14.4 Each observation shall be made in person with full knowledge of the NTPSM being observed. No complaint against a NTPSM by any person, including parents or students, will be used in the evaluation unless the NTPSM has been previously notified of the complaint. Complaints made prior to the NTPSM’s last evaluation may not be used in the current evaluation unless he/she was noted in the previous evaluation. 14.5 An important purpose of the evaluation procedure is to provide constructive assistance to NTPSM. 14.6 A NTPSM shall have the right to read all evaluations conducted by his/her supervisor before the evaluation is placed in his/her personnel file. After reading the evaluation and discussing it with his/her building principal or his/her designee, the NTPSM shall sign the evaluation and receive a copy. If the NTPSM disagrees with the evaluation, the NTPSM shall have an opportunity to submit a letter of rebuttal, which shall be permanently attached to the evaluation. If the NTPSM decides to attach such a letter, it must be given to the building principal within two (2) weeks of the above- mentioned discussion. 14.7 Results of student assessments will not be used on NTPSM evaluations. 14.8 Evaluation reports shall bear the signature of both the building principal or his/her designee and the NTPSM. The signature of the NTPSM does not necessarily indicate agreement; it only indicates knowledge that the report will be included in his/her personnel file. 14.9 Any disciplinary action not related to classroom performance, which is documented in the NTPSM’s personnel file, shall not be used on an evaluation, unless there has been a repeat of the same behavior. If there is a repeat of the same behavior, it may be documented on the evaluation. 14.10 With the NTPSM’s consent, any NTPSM may be informally observed by other educational professionals. 14.11 The building principal or his/her designee will document any comments concerning aspects of the NTPSM’s performance that were not directly observed by the writer of the evaluation. These comments shall not be placed in the evaluation until thoroughly investigated. 14.12 If any deadline in this Article is missed, due to extenuating circumstances other than absences of the NTPSM or administrator, both parties may agree to extend the deadline. The deadline will automatically be extended due to a NTPSM or an administrator absence.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Master Agreement, Master Agreement, Master Agreement
NTPSM EVALUATION. 14.1 The evaluation of the work of all NTPSMs is a responsibility of the building principal. The building principal who may designate an assistant principalprincipal the Director of Special Education, or the Special Education CoordinatorCoordinator to conduct the NTSPM evaluation, provided that the designee has knowledge of the NTPSM’s subject area. The NTPSM will be notified by October 1 of the administrator who will be performing the evaluation. When a NTPSM works in more than one (1) building, only one (1) administrator may evaluate themthat employee. The other administrator(s) may have input. Central Office Administration also has the right to come in and observe the NTPSM and provide written feedback.
14.2 The form(s) to be Beginning with the 2017-18 school year, the tool used for NTPSM evaluation shall be those attached the same tool as used for teacher evaluation. The current tool shall remain in use for the 2016-17 school year. Until use of the new tool, paper copies of all evaluation forms will be kept in the NTPSM’s file.
A. The Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Services and/or designee(s) shall meet with a committee including SLEA leadership and NTPSM representatives to this Agreementdevelop guidelines for use of the Effective Educators model with NTPSMs.
14.3 All written observations and evaluations A copy of the final evaluation made by the building principal or his/her designee shall be recorded and placed in the NTPSM’s personnel file.
14.4 Each observation shall be made in person with full knowledge of the NTPSM being observed. No complaint against a NTPSM by any person, including parents or students, will be used in the evaluation unless the NTPSM has been previously notified of the complaint. Complaints made prior to before the NTPSM’s last evaluation may not be used in the current evaluation unless he/she was noted in the previous evaluation.
14.5 An important purpose of the evaluation procedure is to provide constructive assistance to NTPSM.
14.6 A NTPSM shall have the right to read all final evaluations conducted by his/her supervisor before the evaluation is placed in his/her personnel file. After reading the final evaluation and discussing it with his/her building principal or his/her designee, the NTPSM shall sign the evaluation and receive a copy. If the NTPSM disagrees with an individual observation or the final evaluation, the NTPSM shall have an opportunity to submit a letter of rebuttal, which shall be permanently maintained in the personnel file attached to the final evaluation. If the NTPSM decides to attach such a letter, it must be given to the building principal within two (2) weeks of the above- mentioned discussion.
14.7 Results of student assessments will not be used on NTPSM evaluations.
14.8 Evaluation Final evaluation reports shall bear the signature of both the building principal or his/her designee and the NTPSM. The signature of the NTPSM does not necessarily indicate agreement; it only indicates knowledge that the report will be included in his/her personnel file.
14.9 Any disciplinary action not related to classroom performance, which is documented in the NTPSM’s personnel file, shall not be used on an evaluation, unless there has been a repeat of the same behavior. If there is a repeat of the same behavior, it may be documented on the evaluation.
14.10 With the NTPSM’s consent, any NTPSM may be informally observed by other educational professionals.
14.11 The building principal or his/her designee will document any comments concerning aspects of the NTPSM’s performance that were not directly observed by the writer of the evaluation. These comments shall not be placed in the evaluation until thoroughly investigated.
14.12 If any deadline in this Article is missed, due to extenuating circumstances other than absences of the NTPSM or administrator, both parties may agree to extend the deadline. The deadline will automatically be extended due to a NTPSM or an administrator absence.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Master Agreement
NTPSM EVALUATION. 14.1 The evaluation of the work of all NTPSMs is a responsibility of the building principal. The building principal who may designate an assistant principalprincipal the Director of Special Education, or the Special Education CoordinatorCoordinator to conduct the NTSPM evaluation, provided that the designee has knowledge of the NTPSM’s subject area. The NTPSM will be notified by October 1 of the administrator who will be performing the evaluation. When a NTPSM works in more than one (1) building, only one (1) administrator may evaluate themthat employee. The other administrator(s) may have input. Central Office Administration also has the right to come in and observe the NTPSM and provide written feedback.
14.2 The form(sAssistant Superintendent for Administrative Services and/or designee(s) shall meet annually with a committee including SLEA leadership and NTPSM representatives to review and update guidelines for use of the Effective Educators model for NTPSMs. Additional meetings will be used for NTPSM evaluation shall be those attached to this Agreementscheduled upon request of either party.
14.3 All written observations and evaluations A copy of the final evaluation made by the building principal or his/her their designee shall be recorded and placed in the NTPSM’s personnel file.
14.4 Each observation shall be made in person with full knowledge of the NTPSM being observed. No complaint against a NTPSM by any person, including parents or students, will be used in the evaluation unless the NTPSM has been previously notified of the complaint. Complaints made prior to before the NTPSM’s last evaluation may not be used in the current evaluation unless he/she was noted in the previous evaluationthey were previously notified.
14.5 An important purpose of the evaluation procedure is to provide constructive assistance to a NTPSM.
14.6 A NTPSM shall have the right to read all final evaluations conducted by his/her their supervisor before the evaluation is placed in his/her their personnel file. After reading the final evaluation and discussing it with his/her their building principal or his/her their designee, the NTPSM shall sign the evaluation and receive a copy. If the NTPSM disagrees with an individual observation or the final evaluation, the NTPSM shall have an opportunity to submit a letter of rebuttal, which shall be permanently maintained in the personnel file attached to the final evaluation. If the NTPSM decides to attach such a letter, ,it must be given to the building principal within two (2) weeks of the above- mentioned discussion.
14.7 Results of student assessments will not be used on NTPSM evaluations.
14.8 Evaluation reports shall bear the signature of both the building principal or his/her designee and the NTPSM. The signature of the NTPSM does not necessarily indicate agreement; it only indicates knowledge that the report will be included in his/her personnel file.
14.9 Any disciplinary action not related to classroom performance, which is documented in the NTPSM’s personnel file, shall not be used on an evaluation, unless there has been a repeat of the same behavior. If there is a repeat of the same behavior, it may be documented on the evaluation.
14.10 With the NTPSM’s consent, any NTPSM may be informally observed by other educational professionals.
14.11 The building principal or his/her designee will document any comments concerning aspects of the NTPSM’s performance that were not directly observed by the writer of the evaluation. These comments shall not be placed in the evaluation until thoroughly investigated.
14.12 If any deadline in this Article is missed, due to extenuating circumstances other than absences of the NTPSM or administrator, both parties may agree to extend the deadline. The deadline will automatically be extended due to a NTPSM or an administrator absence.two
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Master Agreement
