(O). Reg. 522/17] The Trustee is hereby authorized and directed to make payment to the Vendor of the amount set out in and upon receipt of an original signed copy of RCCP Form 2 (being the then current form of such document so identified and posted on Xxxxxx’s website).
(O). Section IV(O) shall have the following added to the end of such Section: Physician agrees to comply and abide by all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and guidelines including all applicable Medicare laws, regulations, and CMS instructions, as well as all VIVA Health policies and procedures, including those set forth in the Provider Manual. Physician agrees to abide by all federal and state rules, regulations, and laws applicable to recipients of Medicare funds, including those designed to prevent or ameliorate fraud, waste and abuse and to protect and safeguard the confidentiality of health information, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Physician agrees to perform services consistent with and in compliance with VIVA Health's contractual obligations with CMS and hereby agrees to undertake any additional activities that may be required by CMS or may be necessary for VIVA Health to comply with the legal requirements of its contract with CMS.
(O). O If Cl( ) admits a non-trivial assigned character whose modulus m is sufficiently small, say polynomially bounded by log Disc( ), and if it satisfies gcd(m, q) = 1, then we can use this character to distinguish between random triples and Diffie–Xxxxxxx triples with probability 1/2, as explained in the introduction. So, in this case, we can consider the decisional Diffie–Xxxxxxx problem broken for -oriented elliptic curves over Fq. More generally, if Cl( ) admits s 1 independent such characters (meaning that one cannot use the relation (4.3) to rewrite one of the characters in terms of the others), then we can distinguish with probability 1 − 1/2s. O A sufficient condition for the existence of such a character is that Disc( ) has at least two small odd prime factors different from p = char Fq.7 Heuristically, we expect that this applies to a density 1 subset of all imaginary quadratic orders when ordered ≈ − F 6Here and below, for simplicity, the height h valm(tr(πF )2 4# ) of the m-isogeny volcano of F E over is estimated by O(1). | O 7In serious cryptographic applications, one can ignore the phrase “different from p = char Fq ”. Indeed, if p Disc( ) then E and E′ are necessarily supersingular, so if moreover p is small then we can compute End(E) and End(E′) by navigating through all O(p) nodes of the supersingular isogeny graph. As a result, one is skating on very thin ice (see Section 4.5). Reductions to endomorphism ring computation by the absolute value of their discriminant. This can be backed up using Xxxxxxx’ third theorem; or see [29, III.§6] for more dedicated tools. O O As discussed in [8, §6], one can thwart the attack by restricting the class-group action to Cl( )2, or at least to a subgroup of Cl( ) on which all assigned characters of small modulus have trivial evaluations. However, this may have practical consequences in terms of key generation and key validation. Moreover, we do not rule out that the attack can be modified to work for characters whose order is a larger power of 2, e.g., in view of [3, 27]. Quantumly, it is known that 2r-torsion subgroups, for any small fixed value of r, do not contribute to the hardness of the vectorization problem anyway [5]. Therefore, the cleanest way out is to follow the recommendation from [8, §6], namely to only work with orientations by imaginary quadratic orders whose class number is odd. There may be constructive reasons to deviate from this, e.g., as in the OSIDH protocol [10] where one uses order...
(O). Dated: ------------- SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD PER G.C. SEC. 25103, RESO 79-1535 ATTEST: XXXXX XXXXXXX Clerk of the Board Orange County, California APPROVED AS TO FORM COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA By:�� � Dated: Q///'20 WCB0318-Xx Xxxx 13 of 13 November 19, 2020
(O). The Employer and the Union agree that there shall be no discrimination,intimidation, interference, restriction, or coercion exercised or with respect to any member of the Bargaining Unit in any matter the application of the provisions of this Agreement by reasons of age, race, creed, colour, place of origin, ancestry, citizenship, religious or political affiliation, activity or belief, religious or cultural mode of apparel, sex and sexual orientation, marital, parental or family status (including de facto unions, common law and same sex relationships), number of dependents, record of offenses (except where the record is a reasonable and fide ground for discriminationbecause of the nature of the employment), academic orientation or school of thought (subject to Article place of residence (except where the place of residence is at such distance from the University that it significantly restricts Employees from carrying out their duties and responsibilities), handicap or disability (as defined by the Human Rights code, provided that such handicap or disability does not interfere with the person’s ability to perform the normal regular duties of the position), membership or non-membership in the Union, lawful activity or inactivity in the Union, or the exercise or non-exercise of rights under this Agreement. * With respect to the interpretation of article and certain words used in the article, the parties agree as follows:
(O). Security Deposit of the Lease is hereby deleted and replaced with the following by this First Amendment:
(O). 7.R.10 - Jurisdiction - Parties by agreement restricted jurisdiction to one out of Courts at two places - While considering application for return of plaint issue of jurisdiction cannot be left open by holding that issue of jurisdiction is a contentious one and that it required oral evidence when the same can be decided by examining the admitted document and there is no ambiguity that cause of action arose at two places and parties restricted cause of action at one place - Plaint returned to be presented in a court of competent jurisdiction. (M/x.Xxxxxx Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Xxxxxx Xxxxxx) 2016(2) Civil Court Cases 210 (P&H)
(O). 7.R.11 - Territorial jurisdiction - Loss of answer books - Suit for damages against University - Suit filed in a Court at place ’M’ where University is not having any office nor cause of action arising within limits of said Court - Held, return of plaint is proper. (Xxxxxx Xxxx Vs University of Kerala) 2012(2) Civil Court Cases 673 (Kerala) (DB)
(O). LCL"--'�f
(O). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, BUYER shall not be obligated to purchase the premises unless the SELLER shall have received a Certificate of Occupancy signed by the Inspectional Services Department of the City of Cambridge. BUYER shall be entitled to an inspection of the premises after BUYER receives notification that a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued and the Unit is in conformity with the plans and specifications attached to this Agreement. Buyer shall conduct an inspection of the Unit and should the BUYER find any defects, BUYER shall list such and immediately provide such list to SELLER, on the form attached hereto as Exhibit , whereupon BUYER and SELLER will agree on the value of the items to be completed on such list, and SELLER shall insofar as possible correct same prior to time of closing. In the event SELLER is unable to do so, and the value of such items on the date of closing is greater than $1,500.00, BUYER, at BUYER's option, may postpone the closing until SELLER has completed work on such list to the extent that the value of such list is reduced below $1,500.00. In the event BUYER wishes to close with the value of the list of items exceeding $1,500.00, or in the event the value of the list is less than $1,500.00 on the date of closing, the closing shall occur, and one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount it will cost SELLER to complete the work may be retained in escrow by the BUYER’s attorney until the work is done with release of the funds on an item-by-item basis as the work is completed. Notwithstanding the above or anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if there are requests by the BUYER subsequent to the execution hereof, identifying the Unit and agreed to in writing by the Parties, which adds and/or deletes any improvements, fixtures or appliances, or the like (the “Additional Unit Work”) and that Additional Unit Work has not been completed by the Closing Date and/or as a result of the Additional Unit Work other work has not been completed and/or building permit sign-offs cannot be obtained from the City of Cambridge, then the SELLER shall not be required to deliver building permit sign- offs or, if applicable, the Certificate of Occupancy on the Closing Date and the BUYER shall accept delivery of the Unit in such unfinished condition and pay the balance of the purchase price in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The delivery to the BUYER of a certification by the SELL...
