OTHER IMPLICATIONS a) Does the legislation have indirect or long-term financial impacts to the City of Seattle that are not reflected in the above?
b) Is there financial cost or other impacts of not implementing the legislation?
c) Does this legislation affect any departments besides the originating department?
d) Is a public hearing required for this legislation?
e) Does this legislation require landlords or sellers of real property to provide information regarding the property to a buyer or tenant?
f) Is publication of notice with The Daily Journal of Commerce and/or The Seattle Times required for this legislation? No.
g) Does this legislation affect a piece of property?
h) Please describe any perceived implication for the principles of the Race and Social Justice Initiative. Does this legislation impact vulnerable or historically disadvantaged communities?
i) If this legislation includes a new initiative or a major programmatic expansion: What are the long-term and measurable goals of the program? Please describe how this legislation would help achieve the program’s desired goals.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. Any amendment to Schedule 9 of the XXXX Agreement will be in effect until December 31, 2023. The proposed options deal only with the recycling depots and civic recycling portions of the agreement. As such, the multi-unit residential recycling program is not expected to be affected in any way. There are no privacy, social, or environmental implications identified.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. Public notice, pursuant to Section 3(j) of Council Policy C01-021, Public Notice Policy, is required before City Council considers leasing park lands. A copy of the Public Notice for this matter can be found in Appendix 1. There are no privacy, legal, social or environmental implications identified.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. There may be legal issues regarding the negotiation of the contract with Cosmo. The Office of the City Solicitor has prepared a separate response on this topic (Appendix 2). There are no privacy, social, or environmental implications identified.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS a. Does this legislation affect any departments besides the originating department?
b. Is a public hearing required for this legislation?
c. Does this legislation require landlords or sellers of real property to provide information regarding the property to a buyer or tenant?
d. Is publication of notice with The Daily Journal of Commerce and/or The Seattle Times required for this legislation? No.
e. Does this legislation affect a piece of property?
f. Please describe any perceived implication for the principles of the Race and Social Justice Initiative. Does this legislation impact vulnerable or historically disadvantaged communities?
g. If this legislation includes a new initiative or a major programmatic expansion: What are the specific long-term and measurable goal(s) of the program? How will this legislation help achieve the program’s desired goal(s).
h. Other Issues:
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. Procurement Issues None
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. Failure to delegate authority may have an impact on the quality of life for all Milton Keynes residents (stakeholders) which address issues of Human Rights, Equalities/Diversity and sustainability. Environmental crime is detrimental to the amenity of an area and results in an air of neglect on an estate/area, which in turn can lead to an increase in criminal activity. Rapid response, effective enforcement action along with a punitive payment scheme for offences committed will help to reduce the issues that environmental crimes create. Due to full costs not always being awarded by the courts and the number of FPNs being issued and paid are unknown in advance, it is impossible to forecast exact figures. However, by working closely with the courts we can highlight the costs involved with these prosecutions and the importance of full costs being awarded back to the authority. Another factor to take into consideration is that once the costs have been set/awarded through the court, the repayment is administered by them. Unfortunately, should offenders have repayment issues then this is dealt with by the court and as such MKC has no control over the repayment mechanism or period. Y Equalities/Diversity Y Sustainability Y Human Rights N E-Government Y Stakeholders Y Crime and Disorder Background Papers: Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 Environmental Protection Act 1990 Highways Act 1980 Town & Country Planning Act 1990 Anti Social Behaviour Act 2003 Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1986 Criminal Damage Act 1971 Refuse Disposal (Amenities) Act 1987 Enforcement Policy Current FPN rates DEFRA guidance on Management of Shopping Trolleys SaferMK/Parish docs – Action Plan NAG priorities
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. 7.5.1. None.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS. None associated with this report. COMMUNICATIONS The City and EPCOR will continue ongoing communications activities to keep the public and stakeholders informed on WWTP activities.
OTHER IMPLICATIONS a) Does the legislation have indirect or long-term financial impacts to the City of Seattle that are not reflected in the above?
b) Is there financial cost or other impacts of not implementing the legislation? Without a franchise agreement in place, there would be no legal framework in which to operate in the City of SeaTac’s right-of-way. SCL and SeaTac would need to continue negotiations for a franchise agreement that would meet approval of both Cities’ legislative bodies, which at the very least would have impacts on administrative costs. The assumption is SCL would continue to operate within SeaTac during this time, so there should be no short-term negative impact to SCL’s revenues. However, if the proposed Agreement is not approved, the contract fee payment to the City of SeaTac
c) Does this legislation affect any departments besides the originating department?
d) Is a public hearing required for this legislation?
e) Is publication of notice with The Daily Journal of Commerce and/or The Seattle Times required for this legislation? Yes. Per the Franchise Agreement, the City of SeaTac will place the notice within 5 days of effective date of the Agreement; Seattle City Light bears the cost.
f) Does this legislation affect a piece of property?
g) Please describe any perceived implication for the principles of the Race and Social Justice Initiative. Does this legislation impact vulnerable or historically disadvantaged communities?
h) If this legislation includes a new initiative or a major programmatic expansion: What are the long-term and measurable goals of the program? Please describe how this legislation would help achieve the program’s desired goals.
i) Other Issues:
