Performance Analyses Sample Clauses

Performance Analyses. A total of six hypothesis tests will be conducted to address the primary and secondary objectives of the study. The primary, second secondary and third secondary will be tests of non-inferiority while the first secondary, fourth secondary and fifth secondary will be tests of superiority. A combination of gate-keeping and Bonferroni adjustment strategies will be employed to control the overall type I error rate at 0.05. The hypothesis tests and the testing order (multiplicity adjustment) are outlined in Figure 15-1.

Performance Analyses. Key management demands extra storage space to store the required keys for the secure communication. The performance comparison provided in this subsection presents the space and computation overhead that are related with the size of the key set. A simple node stores at least three key related information from {S1, S2, S3}. Table 2 shows feature comparisons between the proposed privacy supporting HKAP and Guo, et al.’s protocol. Features Protocols Size of key set Number of pairing operations Guo et al.’s log n log n Privacy supporting HKAP Constant Constant There is an increase in the size of key set in Guo, et al.’s protocol if the number of nodes in the network denoted as n in Table 2 is increased. However, the proposed privacy supporting HKAP keeps the same size of key set with constant of 3 even if it varies. Furthermore, the computational overhead does affect to the size of key set it Guo, et al.’s protocol, which is very important property especially in WSN with the limits of battery life or resource constraints.