Performance Analyses Sample Clauses

Performance Analyses. A total of six hypothesis tests will be conducted to address the primary and secondary objectives of the study. The primary, second secondary and third secondary will be tests of non-inferiority while the first secondary, fourth secondary and fifth secondary will be tests of superiority. A combination of gate-keeping and Bonferroni adjustment strategies will be employed to control the overall type I error rate at 0.05. The hypothesis tests and the testing order (multiplicity adjustment) are outlined in Figure 15-1.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Analyses. Key management demands extra storage space to store the required keys for the secure communication. The performance comparison provided in this subsection presents the space and computation overhead that are related with the size of the key set. A simple node stores at least three key related information from {S1, S2, S3}. Table 2 shows feature comparisons between the proposed privacy supporting HKAP and Guo, et al.’s protocol. Table 2. Comparisons between Related Protocols Features Protocols Size of key set Number of pairing operations Guo et al.’s log n log n Privacy supporting HKAP Constant Constant There is an increase in the size of key set in Guo, et al.’s protocol if the number of nodes in the network denoted as n in Table 2 is increased. However, the proposed privacy supporting HKAP keeps the same size of key set with constant of 3 even if it varies. Furthermore, the computational overhead does affect to the size of key set it Guo, et al.’s protocol, which is very important property especially in WSN with the limits of battery life or resource constraints.

Related to Performance Analyses

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Monitoring A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA:

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.