Power Factor Correction Charge Sample Clauses

Power Factor Correction Charge. KMEA shall provide adequate reactive compensation for KMEA’s Network Load to maintain at all times the load power factor at each of the delivery points shown in Appendix 2 between .95 lagging and .98 leading. KMEA conditions that result in excessive reactive flows will be corrected as soon as practical. KMEA shall compensate Mid-Kansas for excessive reactive flows at a rate consistent with SPP market practices. The Parties shall maintain the system voltages on their respective side of the Receipt Point in accordance with Good Utility Practice.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Power Factor Correction Charge. 8.78 Redispatch Charge Redispatch charges shall be in accordance with Section 33.3 of the Tariff. For request 1140120 and request 1161506, the Emporia Energy Center resource, provide generation redispatch power in the specified amounts necessary to alleviate loadings on the facilities listed in Attachment A prior to the completion of the planned Transmission Owner reliability network upgrades or new construction associated with each limiting facility. The specified amounts and constraining facilities for which redispatch will be required are also defined in Attachment A. The Network Customer agrees to provide at least one of the potential Westar redispatch pairs listed in Table 6 of the posted 2006-AG3-AFS-6 study, and the Transmission Provider agrees that such redispatch will satisfy the redispatch obligation. Such redispatch obligations shall be arranged in accordance with Attachment K of the Tariff and shall occur in advance of curtailment of other firm reservations impacting these constraints. Network Customer shall bear the cost of such redispatch. The interim network integration transmission service shall remain in place until the network upgrades are completed. For request and resource (denoted in table below), provide generation redispatch power in the specified amounts necessary to alleviate loading on the facilities listed in Attachment A prior to completion of Service, Reliability, and Construction Pending upgrades. The Network Customer agrees to provide at least one of the potential WR redispatch pairs listed in Table 6 of the final posting of study (denoted in table below) , and the Transmission Provider agrees that such redispatch will satisfy the redispatch obligation. OASIS Request Resource Aggregate Study 73315407 Central Plains Wind 2007-AG2 73447931 Xxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxx 0000-XX0 73447934 Flat Ridge Wind 2007-AG3 1457049 Xxxxxxx Energy Center 2008-AGP1 In the absence of implementation of interim redispatch as requested by the Transmission Provider for Network Customer transactions resulting in overloads on limiting facilities, the Transmission Provider shall curtail the customers schedule. Such redispatch obligations shall be arranged in accordance with Attachment K of the Tariff and shall occur in advance of curtailment of other firm reservations impacting these constraints. Network Customer shall bear the cost of such redispatch. The interim redispatch service shall remain in place until the network upgrades are completed.
Power Factor Correction Charge. Reserved
Power Factor Correction Charge. KPP shall provide adequate reactive compensation for KPP’s Network Load to maintain at all times the load power factor at each of the delivery points shown in Appendix 2 between .95 lagging and .98 leading. KPP conditions that result in excessive reactive flows will be corrected as soon as practical. KPP shall compensate Local Delivery Provider for excessive reactive flows at a rate consistent with SPP market practices. The Parties shall maintain the system voltages on their respective side of the Receipt Point in accordance with Good Utility Practice.
Power Factor Correction Charge 

Related to Power Factor Correction Charge

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Disaster Recovery PFPC shall enter into and shall maintain in effect with appropriate parties one or more agreements making reasonable provisions for emergency use of electronic data processing equipment to the extent appropriate equipment is available. In the event of equipment failures, PFPC shall, at no additional expense to the Fund, take reasonable steps to minimize service interruptions. PFPC shall have no liability with respect to the loss of data or service interruptions caused by equipment failure, provided such loss or interruption is not caused by PFPC's own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its duties or obligations under this Agreement.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing PNG traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to PNG, the subtending arrangements between PNG Tandem Switches and PNG End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that PNG maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.