Presentation of the Case Sample Clauses

Presentation of the Case. The District representative and the employee representative will address their remarks, including objections, to the Board. The hearing shall proceed in the following order unless the Board directs otherwise:  The District shall produce its evidence, including witness testimony  The employee may then offer evidence, including witness testimony  Rebuttal evidence, if any, provided by District, then employee
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Presentation of the Case. The parties will address their remarks, evidence, and objections to the appeal hearing officer. The appeal hearing officer may terminate argument at any time and issue a ruling regarding an objection or any other matter. The appeal hearing officer may limit redundant or irrelevant testimony, or directly question the witness. The hearing will proceed in the following order unless the appeal hearing officer directs otherwise:
Presentation of the Case. The hearing shall proceed in the following order unless the arbitrator, for special reasons, directs otherwise: 1. The party imposing discipline (District) shall be permitted to make an opening statement. 2. The appealing party (employee) shall be permitted to make an opening statement, or reserve an opening statement until presentation of their case. 3. The party imposing disciplinary action (District) shall produce their evidence. 4. The party appealing from such disciplinary action (employee) shall produce their evidence. 5. The party imposing discipline (District) followed by the appealing party (employee) may offer rebutting evidence. 6. Closing arguments shall be permitted at the discretion of the arbitrator. The party with the burden of proof shall have the right to go first and to close the hearing by making the last argument. The arbitrator may place a time limit on closing arguments. The arbitrator or either party may request the submission of written briefs. If written briefs are requested by either of the parties, the arbitrator will determine whether to allow the parties to submit written briefs and, if so, to determine the maximum number of pages for such briefs.
Presentation of the Case. The parties will address their remarks, evidence, and objections to the appeal hearing officer. The appeal hearing officer may terminate argument at any time and issue a ruling regarding an objection or any other matter. The appeal hearing officer may limit redundant or irrelevant testimony, or directly question the witness. The hearing will proceed in the following order unless the appeal hearing officer directs otherwise: i. The City is permitted to make an opening statement; ii. The employee and/or their representative is permitted to make an opening statement; iii. The City will produce its evidence; iv. The employee will produce its evidence v. The City, followed by the employee, may present rebuttal evidence; and vi. Oral closing arguments of no more than twenty (20) minutes may be permitted at the discretion of the appeal hearing officer. The City argues first, the employee argues second, and if the City reserved a portion of its time for rebuttal, the City may present a rebuttal.

Related to Presentation of the Case

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!