Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC (“A Beep”), filed a joint Petition for approval of Paging Interconnection Agreement dated July 24, 2003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A Beep, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 2726, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. (“A BeepGlobal”), ) filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24August 23, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, XXX on behalf of A BeepGlobal, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 84, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 84, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August January 27, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois) (“SBC”) and A Beep LLC Oneida Network Services, Inc. (“A BeepOneida”), filed a joint Petition for approval of Paging Interconnection a negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement dated July 24January 2, 20032003 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepXxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8March 11, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8March 11th, SBC Illinois SBC, Oneida, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 2724, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC VarTec Telecom, Inc. (“A BeepVarTec”), ) filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Sixth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24August 18, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on Xxxxxx Xxxx behalf of A BeepVarTec, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 84, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 84, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27May 10, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Intermedia Communications, Inc. (“A BeepIntermedia”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Third Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24April 20, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepIntermedia, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8June 10, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8June 10, SBC Illinois Illinois, Intermedia, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27January 23, 20032001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Ameritech Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Looking Glass Networks, Inc. (“A BeepLooking Glass”), filed a joint Petition request for approval of Paging the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated July 24November 1, 20032000 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionrequest. A statement in support of the petition request was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of SBC Illinois Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxx, on behalf of A BeepLooking Glass, stating that the facts contained in the petition request for approval are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and beliefcorrect. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8February 28, 20032001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Agreement. At the hearing on October 8hearing, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence , and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 2716, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC nii communications, Ltd. (“A Beepnii”), ) filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 2428, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of A Beepnii, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8September 21, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8September 21, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27September 9, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“A BeepOnePoint”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24September 1, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of A BeepOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 818, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 818, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27January 8, 20032009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall Communications, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“A BeepEverycall”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24December 31, 20032008, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepEverycall, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8February 10, 20032008. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8February 10, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27October 17, 20032012, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC tw telecom of illinois llc (“A Beeptw telecom”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24October 12, 20032012, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A Beeptw telecom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8November 19, 20032012. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8November 19, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27December 16, 20032005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC IBFA Acquisition Company d/b/a Farm Bureau Connection (“A BeepIBFA”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging Interconnection Agreement 2nd amendment to the interconnection agreement dated July 24November 28, 20032005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepIBFA, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8January 17, 20032006. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8January 17, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27February 1, 20032007, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC Geneseo Telephone Company (“A BeepGeneseo”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging Interconnection the ILEC Operator Services/Directory Assistance Standalone Agreement dated July 24January 9, 20032007, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of A BeepGeneseo, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8March 22, 20032007. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27September 10, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Illinois, Inc. (“A BeepAmeritech”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Tenth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24August 21, 2003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepAmeritech, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 821, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 821, SBC Illinois Illinois, Ameritech, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27June 8, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Globalcom, Inc. (“A BeepGlobalcom”), ) filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24May 27, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxx on behalf of A BeepGlobalcom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8July 12, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8July 12, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27February 7, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois) (hereinafter “SBC”) and A Beep LLC Arch Wireless Operating Company, Inc. (“A BeepArch Wireless”), filed a joint Petition for approval of the Paging Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated July 24January 15, 20032003 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC, and by Xxxx X. Xxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepArch Wireless, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by given in accordance with the law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing was heard by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8February 26, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8, Counsel for SBC Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x The Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27October 20, 20032005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC Megacomm Corporation d/b/a MegaPage (“A BeepMegacomm”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of a Paging Interconnection Agreement dated July 24September 27, 20032005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepMegacomm, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8November 17, 20032005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8November 17, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 2724, 20032011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep Sonic Telecom, LLC (“A BeepSonic”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24August 15, 20032011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of A Beep, Sonic stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8November 2, 20032011. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8November 2, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 2717, 20032009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC AT&T Illinois”) and A Beep LLC Aero North Communications Inc. (“A BeepAero North”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24August 10, 2003, 2009 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBC AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepAero North, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8September 3, 20032009. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications DivisionDivision on September 3, 2009. At the hearing on October 8hearing, SBC Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27February 25, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and A Beep OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“A BeepOnePoint”), filed a joint Petition for approval of Paging the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24February 20, 20032004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of A BeepOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8April 19, 20032004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8April 19, SBC Illinois Illinois, OnePoint, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 27June 9, 20032005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and A Beep LLC Xxxxxx Communications, Inc. (“A BeepXxxxxx”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of Paging the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated July 24June 1, 20032005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of A BeepXxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 8July 21, 20032005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 8July 21, SBC Illinois Xxxx, Xxxxxx, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”