Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17, 2012, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc (“tw telecom”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12, 2012, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of tw telecom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19, 2012. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 26, 20122004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. (“tw telecomGlobal”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12August 23, 20122004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, XXX on behalf of tw telecomGlobal, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19October 4, 20122004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19October 4, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 16, 20122004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc nii communications, Ltd. (“tw telecomnii”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12July 28, 20122004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of tw telecomnii, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19September 21, 20122004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19September 21, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17February 13, 20122013, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Illinois d/b/a AT&T Wholesale (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc 365 Wireless, LLC (“tw telecom365”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated October 12January 31, 20122013, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of tw telecom365, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19March 13, 20122013. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19March 13, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17February 25, 20122004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“tw telecomOnePoint”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12February 20, 20122004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of tw telecomOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November April 19, 20122004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November April 19, Illinois XxxxSBC Illinois, xx telecom OnePoint, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17September 9, 20122004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“tw telecomOnePoint”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12September 1, 20122004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of tw telecomOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19October 18, 20122004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19October 18, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October August 17, 20122009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellAT&T Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Aero North Communications Inc. (“tw telecomAero North”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12August 10, 2012, 2009 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §151 § 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of tw telecomAero North, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19September 3, 20122009. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications DivisionDivision on September 3, 2009. At the hearing on November 19hearing, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 24, 20122011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Sonic Telecom, LLC (“tw telecomSonic”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12August 15, 20122011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of tw telecom, Sonic stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 192, 20122011. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 192, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17June 29, 20122011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Big River Telephone Company, LLC. (“tw telecomBig River”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12June 28, 20122011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of tw telecom, Big River stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19September 12, 20122011. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19September 12, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17February 1, 20122007, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Geneseo Telephone Company (“tw telecomGeneseo”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection ILEC Operator Services/Directory Assistance Standalone Agreement dated October 12January 9, 20122007, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of tw telecomGeneseo, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19March 22, 20122007. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 22, 20122005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and tw telecom of illinois llc Cinergy Communications Company (“tw telecom”), Cinergy) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12August 16, 20122005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx X. Bye on behalf of tw telecomCinergy, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19, 2012. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19, Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there There were no unresolved issues in this proceedingproceeding and the Administrative Law Judge waived the hearing. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx filed by Staff was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken” on September 21, 2005.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 27, 20122003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc A Beep LLC (“tw telecomA Beep”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Paging Interconnection Agreement dated October 12July 24, 20122003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx on behalf of tw telecomSBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of A Beep, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19October 8, 20122003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19October 8, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17August 24, 20122004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and tw telecom of illinois llc VarTec Telecom, Inc. (“tw telecomVarTec”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Sixth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated October 12August 18, 20122004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of tw telecomVarTec, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on November 19October 4, 20122004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on November 19October 4, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”