Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17, 2009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Inc. (“Aero North”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10, 2009 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Aero North, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3, 2009. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009. At the hearing, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17June 29, 20092011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Inc. Big River Telephone Company, LLC. (“Aero NorthBig River”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10June 28, 2009 2011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. XxxxXxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of Aero North, Big River stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 312, 20092011. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on September 12, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17September 9, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North OnePoint Communications Inc. Illinois, LLC (“Aero NorthOnePoint”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10September 1, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of Aero NorthOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3October 18, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on October 18, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August October 17, 20092012, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Inc. tw telecom of illinois llc (“Aero Northtw telecom”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10October 12, 2009 2012, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 §151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Aero Northtw telecom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3November 19, 20092012. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on November 19, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17September 10, 20092003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Illinois, Inc. (“Aero NorthAmeritech”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Tenth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 1021, 2009 2003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthAmeritech, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3October 21, 20092003. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on October 21, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois SBC Illinois, Ameritech, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 1724, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications VarTec Telecom, Inc. (“Aero NorthVarTec”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Sixth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 1018, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on Xxxxxx Xxxx behalf of Aero NorthVarTec, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3October 4, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on October 4, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17June 8, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Globalcom, Inc. (“Aero NorthGlobalcom”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10May 27, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx XxXxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthGlobalcom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3July 12, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on July 12, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17October 20, 20092005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Inc. Megacomm Corporation d/b/a MegaPage (“Aero NorthMegacomm”), filed a joint petition for approval of the a Paging Interconnection Agreement dated August 10September 27, 2009 2005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthMegacomm, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3November 17, 20092005. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on November 17, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17June 9, 20092005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Xxxxxx Communications, Inc. (“Aero NorthXxxxxx”), filed a joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10June 1, 2009 2005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthXxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3July 21, 20092005. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on July 21, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Xxxx, Xxxxxx, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17February 25, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North OnePoint Communications Inc. Illinois, LLC (“Aero NorthOnePoint”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10February 20, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3April 19, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on April 19, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois SBC Illinois, OnePoint, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 1724, 20092011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Inc. Sonic Telecom, LLC (“Aero NorthSonic”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated August 1015, 2009 2011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. XxxxXxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Aero North, Sonic stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3November 2, 20092011. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on November 2, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17February 26, 20092010, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company Frontier North, Inc., and Frontier Communications of the Carolinas, LLC (“AT&T IllinoisFrontier”) ), and Aero North Communications Inc. Venture Corporation d/b/a INdigital telecom (“Aero NorthINdigital”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10, 2009 under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 et seq.) (“the Act”). A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx on behalf of AT&T Illinois Frontier and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthINdigital, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3February 19, 20092014. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3January 29, 20092014. At the hearing, Aero North hearing INdigital did not appear. AT&T Illinois Frontier and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 1727, 20092003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Inc. A Beep LLC (“Aero NorthA Beep”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Paging Interconnection Agreement dated August 10July 24, 2009 2003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthA Beep, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3October 8, 20092003. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on October 8, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17February 1, 20092007, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and Aero North Communications Inc. Geneseo Telephone Company (“Aero NorthGeneseo”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection ILEC Operator Services/Directory Assistance Standalone Agreement dated August 10January 9, 2009 2007, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthGeneseo, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3March 22, 20092007. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearing, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 17January 23, 20092001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T Ameritech Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Looking Glass Networks, Inc. (“Aero NorthLooking Glass”), filed a joint petition request for approval of the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated August 10November 1, 2009 2000 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the petition request was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and Xxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Aero NorthLooking Glass, stating that the facts contained in the petition request for approval are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and beliefcorrect. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3February 28, 20092001. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3Division, 2009which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, Aero North did not appear. AT&T Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence , and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 1716, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Inc. nii communications, Ltd. (“Aero Northnii”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 10July 28, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Aero Northnii, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 321, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on September 21, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 1726, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AT&T SBC Illinois”) and Aero North Communications Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. (“Aero NorthGlobal”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated August 1023, 2009 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 252 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of AT&T SBC Illinois and by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, XXX on behalf of Aero NorthGlobal, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by the a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on September 3October 4, 20092004. Staff previously filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division on September 3, 2009Division. At the hearinghearing on October 4, Aero North did not appear. AT&T SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”