Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“OnePoint”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of OnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18, 2004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9August 24, 20042011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisSonic Telecom, LLC (“OnePointSonic”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1August 15, 20042011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of OnePoint, Sonic stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18November 2, 20042011. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18November 2, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9August 27, 20042003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, A Beep LLC (“OnePointA Beep”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Paging Interconnection Agreement dated September 1July 24, 20042003, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by J. Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of OnePointA Beep, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 188, 20042003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 188, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9February 25, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC (“OnePoint”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Seventh Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1February 20, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of OnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18April 19, 2004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18April 19, SBC Illinois Illinois, OnePoint, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9January 23, 20042001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Ameritech Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisLooking Glass Networks, LLC Inc. (“OnePointLooking Glass”), filed a joint petition request for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated September November 1, 20042000 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionrequest. A statement in support of the petition request was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of SBC Illinois Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxx Xxxx, on behalf of OnePointLooking Glass, stating that the facts contained in the petition request for approval are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and beliefcorrect. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18February 28, 20042001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Agreement. At the hearing on October 18hearing, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence , and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9October 20, 20042005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC Megacomm Corporation d/b/a MegaPage (“OnePointMegacomm”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the a Paging Interconnection Agreement dated September 127, 20042005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of OnePointMegacomm, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18November 17, 20042005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18November 17, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9August 26, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisGlobal Crossing Local Services, LLC Inc. (“OnePointGlobal”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1August 23, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, XXX on behalf of OnePointGlobal, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 184, 2004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 184, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9August 16, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications Illinoisnii communications, LLC Ltd. (“OnePointnii”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1July 28, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of OnePointnii, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18September 21, 2004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18September 21, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9February 1, 20042007, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC Geneseo Telephone Company (“OnePointGeneseo”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection ILEC Operator Services/Directory Assistance Standalone Agreement dated September 1January 9, 20042007, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of OnePointGeneseo, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18March 22, 20042007. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9August 24, 2004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisVarTec Telecom, LLC Inc. (“OnePointVarTec”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Sixth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1August 18, 2004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxx on behalf of OnePointVarTec, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 184, 2004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 184, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9January 27, 20042003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois) (“SBC”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisOneida Network Services, LLC Inc. (“OnePointOneida”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection a negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement dated September 1January 2, 20042003 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of OnePointXxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18March 11, 20042003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18March 11th, SBC Illinois SBC, Oneida, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9October 17, 20042012, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC IllinoisIllinois Bell”) and OnePoint Communications Illinois, LLC tw telecom of illinois llc (“OnePointtw telecom”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated September 1October 12, 20042012, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of OnePointtw telecom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18November 19, 20042012. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18November 19, SBC Illinois Xxxx, xx telecom and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On September 9February 7, 20042003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois) (hereinafter “SBC”) and OnePoint Communications IllinoisArch Wireless Operating Company, LLC Inc. (“OnePointArch Wireless”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Seventh Amendment to the Paging Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated September 1January 15, 20042003 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois SBC, and by Xxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of OnePointArch Wireless, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by given in accordance with the law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing was heard by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on October 18February 26, 20042003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on October 18, Counsel for SBC Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x The Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”