Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 30, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (SBC Illinois) ("SBC") and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, by Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation (collectively “Voicestream”), filed a joint Petition for approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated January 14, 2003 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of SBC, and by Xxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of Voicestream, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on March 18, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on March 18, Staff and SBC appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 30June 29, 20032010, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company Verizon North Inc. and Verizon South Inc. (SBC Illinois) ("SBC"collectively, “Verizon”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, by Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. (collectively “VoicestreamCincinnati Bell”), ) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a joint Petition petition for approval of the Fifth First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the an Interconnection Agreement dated January 14, 2003 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section 252 Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Telecommunications Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx on behalf of SBC, Verizon and by Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamCincinnati Bell, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on March 18August 4, 20032010. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on March 18August 4, 2010, Verizon, Cincinnati Bell, and Staff and SBC appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 30December 23, 20032002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (SBC “Ameritech Illinois) ("SBC"”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, by By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation (collectively “Voicestream”), filed a joint Petition for approval of the Fifth Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated January 14November 18, 2003 2002 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (the “the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of SBCAmeritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx on behalf of Voicestream, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on March 18January 7, 2003. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At appeared at the hearing on March 18, Staff and SBC appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x The Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 3019, 20032006, and pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company Verizon North, Inc., Verizon South, Inc. (SBC Illinois) ("SBC"“Verizon”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating CompanyNavigator Telecommunications, LLC, by Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation LLC (collectively “VoicestreamNavigator”), filed a joint Petition petition for approval of a negotiated agreement that amends the Fifth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated January 14, 2003 terms of their interconnection agreement (the “Amendment”), under effective December 1, 2005, and that is governed by Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The A copy of this No. 2 Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition instant petition was also filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx XxxxxxxXxxxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBCXxxxxxx, and by Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx XxXxxxxxx on behalf of VoicestreamNavigator, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct petition are, to the best of their knowledge, information, knowledge and belief, true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on was scheduled for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on March 18February 22, 20032006. Prior to this hearing date, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At In his written statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the No. 2 Amendment. The Administrative Law Judge waived the hearing on March 18, Staff and SBC appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x matter and, by ruling, admitted the Verified Statement was admitted of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx into evidence and marked the record was marked “Heard and Taken” on January 31, 2006. See ALJ Notice (1-31-06).”