Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On April 25, 2003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and AccuTel of Texas, Inc. d/b/a 1-800-4-A- PHONE (“AccuTel”), filed a Joint Petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 11, 2003 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of AccuTel, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 3, 2003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on June 3, SBC and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On April 25November 1, 20032002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Ameritech Illinois”) and AccuTel Focal Communications Corporation of Texas, Inc. d/b/a 1-800-4-A- PHONE Illinois (“AccuTelFocal”), filed a Joint Petition joint petition for approval of the First Third Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated April 11October 17, 2003 2002 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxx, on behalf of SBC Illinois Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of AccuTelXxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 3December 4, 20032002. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on June 3December 4, SBC Ameritech, Focal, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On April 25February 13, 20032013, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and AccuTel of Texas, Inc. d/b/a 1-800-4-A- PHONE AT&T Illinois d/b/a AT&T Wholesale (“AccuTelIllinois Bell”) and 365 Wireless, LLC (“365”), filed a Joint Petition joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated April 11January 31, 2003 (the “Amendment”)2013, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of SBC Illinois Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of AccuTel365, stating that the facts contained in the Petition petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 3March 13, 20032013. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on June 3March 13, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On April 25December 29, 20032004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC Illinois”) and AccuTel of TexasNorlight Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a 1-800-4-A- PHONE (“AccuTelNorlight”), filed a Joint Petition joint petition for approval of the First Amendment to the a negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated April 11December 22, 2003 2004 (the “AmendmentAgreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petitionpetition. A statement in support of the Petition petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of SBC Illinois Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, on behalf of AccuTelNorlight, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct petition are, to the best of their knowledge, information, information and belief, true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on June 3January 25, 20032005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which recommended the approval of the Amendment. At the hearing on June 3hearing, SBC Illinois and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxx’x Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement Statement, i.e., Staff Ex. 1, was admitted into evidence evidence, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”