PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: docs.cpuc.ca.gov, docs.cpuc.ca.gov
PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this the proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ 2022.1 yak tityu tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022.. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates. To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2 and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: docs.cpuc.ca.gov, docs.cpuc.ca.gov
PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14September 8, 20211998, PG&E a document entitled the Unitil Restructuring Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") was executed and filed by the Application following parties (the “Settling Parties”): the Business and Industry Association of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 New Hampshire (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationBIA”). A4NR; Cabletron Systems, Cal AdvocatesInc. (“Cabletron”); Enron Energy Services, NCTCInc. (“Enron”); Freedom Partners, SLO CountyL.L.C. (“Freedom”); the Staff of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), TURN the Office of Consumer Advocate (“OCA”); the Retail Merchants Association of New Hampshire (“RMA”), and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Unitil Companies: Concord Electric Company (“SCECECo”), Exeter & Hampton Electric Company (“E&H”), Unitil Service Corp. (“USC”), and Unitil Power Corp. (“UPC”) (collectively “Unitil”).1 The Settlement Agreement was intended to resolve most of the contested issues pertaining to Unitil in our restructuring proceeding, DR 96-150, to provide retail access and customer choice for Unitil’s customers by March 1, 1999, and to terminate Unitil’s involvement in the ongoing Federal litigation.2 A duly noticed Prehearing Conference was held on September 18, 1998. Technical sessions were conducted on September 18 and September 24, 1998, and intervenor testimony was filed on October 7, 1998 by the Governor’s Office of 1In addition to the above-stated parties, the Commission granted intervention to the Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Service (“GOECS”), the Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights (“CRR”), State Representative Xxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx of PJA Energy Systems Designs, Granite State Electric Company (“GSEC”) and the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2Under the Settlement the parties agreed to disagree on two issues to be presented to the Commission for determination: 1) use of the Unitil name and logo; and 2) the allocation of partial payments between a motion supplier and the distribution company for party status consolidated billing under the Trading Partner Agreement. Energy and Community Services (“GOECS”), Enron, Staff and the OCA (jointly), and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx., P.E., Chief Engineer of the Commission. On October 12, 1998, the parties conducted a technical session and settlement conference and on February 15October 16, 2022Xxxxxx filed rebuttal testimony. As a result of the technical sessions and the settlement conference, Unitil and the other parties conducted further negotiations and agreed to an Amended Settlement on October 20, 1998. The Amended Settlement addressed a number of issues and concerns raised in the testimony of Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the GOECS, and Xx. Xxxxxxx. The parties to the Amended Settlement included all of the original signatories plus Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, CRR, EnerDev, Inc., and Granite State Taxpayers, Inc. The Commission held evidentiary hearings on October 21, 22, and 23, 1998. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17hearings, 2022the Commission determined that the issue of transmission and distribution classification, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE addressed in Xx. Xxxxxxx’x testimony, would be bifurcated and to DHKseparately noticed. At In addition, the prehearing conference the parties specified issues Commission agreed to be within the scope Settling Parties’ recommendation that the two disputed issues - the use of proceedingthe "Unitil" name and logo, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within allocation of partial payments from customers - be briefed at a later date: November 12, 1998. The parties requested an oral decision of the scope of this proceedingCommission on the Amended Settlement by November 2, 1998. On April 19October 30, 20221998, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo Commission's General Counsel sent a letter to all parties advising that the Commission had sought clarification from the Company of certain language in the Settlement Agreement concerning the Fixed Wind Down Costs, and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established was providing all parties a copy of the issues memorandum response received from Unitil. The Commission invited any party seeking to comment upon the memorandum or object to its inclusion in the record as an exhibit to do so by 10:00 a.m. November 2, 1998. No comments or objections were received. On October 30, 1998, the Commission submitted a record request to Unitil for a schedule of the specific items, by FERC subaccount, to be considered included in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022Fixed Wind Down Costs.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.puc.nh.gov
PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14September 8, 20211998, PG&E a document entitled the Unitil Restructuring Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") was executed and filed by the Application following parties (the “Settling Parties”): the Business and Industry Association of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 New Hampshire (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationBIA”). A4NR; Cabletron Systems, Cal AdvocatesInc. (“Cabletron”); Enron Energy Services, NCTCInc. (“Enron”); Freedom Partners, SLO CountyL.L.C. (“Freedom”); the Staff of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), TURN the Office of Consumer Advocate (“OCA”); the Retail Merchants Association of New Hampshire (“RMA”), and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Unitil Companies: Concord Electric Company (“SCECECo”), Exeter & Hampton Electric Company (“E&H”), Unitil Service Corp. (“USC”), and Unitil Power Corp. (“UPC”) (collectively “Unitil”).1 The Settlement Agreement was intended to resolve most of the contested issues pertaining to Unitil in our restructuring proceeding, DR 96-150, to provide retail access and customer choice for Unitil’s customers by March 1, 1999, and to terminate Unitil’s involvement in the ongoing Federal litigation.2 A duly noticed Prehearing Conference was held on September 18, 1998. Technical sessions were conducted on September 18 and September 24, 1998, and intervenor testimony was filed on October 7, 1998 by the Governor’s Office of 1In addition to the above-stated parties, the Commission granted intervention to the Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Service (“GOECS”), the Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights (“CRR”), State Representative Xxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx of PJA Energy Systems Designs, Granite State Electric Company (“GSEC”) and the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2Under the Settlement the parties agreed to disagree on two issues to be presented to the Commission for determination: 1) use of the Unitil name and logo; and 2) the allocation of partial payments between a motion supplier and the distribution company for party status consolidated billing under the Trading Partner Agreement. Energy and Community Services (“GOECS”), Enron, Staff and the OCA (jointly), and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx., P.E., Chief Engineer of the Commission. On October 12, 1998, the parties conducted a technical session and settlement conference and on February 15October 16, 2022Unitil filed rebuttal testimony. As a result of the technical sessions and the settlement conference, Unitil and the other parties conducted further negotiations and agreed to an Amended Settlement on October 20, 1998. The Amended Settlement addressed a number of issues and concerns raised in the testimony of Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the GOECS, and Xx. Xxxxxxx. The parties to the Amended Settlement included all of the original signatories plus Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, CRR, EnerDev, Inc., and Granite State Taxpayers, Inc. The Commission held evidentiary hearings on October 21, 22, and 23, 1998. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17hearings, 2022the Commission determined that the issue of transmission and distribution classification, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE addressed in Xx. Xxxxxxx’x testimony, would be bifurcated and to DHKseparately noticed. At In addition, the prehearing conference the parties specified issues Commission agreed to be within the scope Settling Parties’ recommendation that the two disputed issues - the use of proceedingthe "Unitil" name and logo, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within allocation of partial payments from customers - be briefed at a later date: November 12, 1998. The parties requested an oral decision of the scope of this proceedingCommission on the Amended Settlement by November 2, 1998. On April 19October 30, 20221998, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo Commission's General Counsel sent a letter to all parties advising that the Commission had sought clarification from the Company of certain language in the Settlement Agreement concerning the Fixed Wind Down Costs, and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established was providing all parties a copy of the issues memorandum response received from Unitil. The Commission invited any party seeking to comment upon the memorandum or object to its inclusion in the record as an exhibit to do so by 10:00 a.m. November 2, 1998. No comments or objections were received. On October 30, 1998, the Commission submitted a record request to Unitil for a schedule of the specific items, by FERC subaccount, to be considered included in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022Fixed Wind Down Costs.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.puc.nh.gov
PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December The Utility submitted its ESA application on September 14, 20212012 and its Smelter and Refinery applications on September 10, PG&E 2012. The ESA was filed under seal because the Application Utility Company considers it a confidential document. The Division of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 Public Utilities (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationDivision”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN ) and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company Office of Consumer Services (“SCEOffice”) filed separate memoranda on October 29, 2012, summarizing their respective analyses and expressing their recommendations regarding the ESA, and the Smelter and Refinery Agreements. As to the ESA, the Division recommended approval while the Office recommended a motion minor revision, i.e., that Kennecott should be subject to a Renewable Energy Credit (“REC”) Revenues Surcharge, if one is ordered, in addition to the REC Revenues Credit. As to the Smelter and Refinery Agreements, both the Division and the Office commented on the need to correct errors in Exhibit E (Pricing) of both agreements. These errors were initially identified by the Utility after it had filed its applications. On November 20, 2012, the Utility filed petitions asking the Commission to accept amendments to all three agreements, in response to the recommendations of the Division and Office. On that date, the Utility also filed a Settlement Stipulation (“Settlement”) executed by representatives of the Utility, the Division and the Office. The Settlement declares the parties’ support for party status Commission approval of the ESA, and the Smelter, and Refinery Agreements, as amended. The parties to the Settlement state that, with the amendments filed on February 15November 20, 20222012, each of the agreements is in the public interest and should be approved. On November 29, 2012, the Commission held a duly-noticed hearing in these three dockets. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted hearing each party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference Settlement testified in support of the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceedingESA, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022Smelter, and April 22Refinery Agreements, respectively; these motions were granted by email as amended, and recommended their approval. No party offered any other evidence. Consequently, at the conclusion of the hearing the Commissioners authorized the presiding officer to issue an oral ruling on May 20approving the three applications and the three agreements, 2022as amended. This written order memorializes that oral ruling.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: pscdocs.utah.gov
