Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this the proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ 2022.1 yak tityu tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”)estimates. To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, TURN SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ hearing,2 and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/2023.3

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 145.1 In May 2016, 2021the Bellflower City Council approved a request for proposal to seek bids for the purchase of Bellflower Municipal. The City received four responses, PG&E including one from California American Water. A citywide election then occurred, where voters approved the decision to sell Bellflower Municipal to California American Water. In September 2018, California American Water filed its initial Application. Cal Advocates filed a protest in October 2018. Following the January 7, 2019 Prehearing Conference, California American Water filed an Amended Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedingon January 22, A.00-00-000 (“2021 NDCTP Application”)2019. A4NRIn April 2019, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Commission issued a Scoping Memorandum,6 which was followed by a public 4 Quoting the Amended Application, to which PG&E responded pp. 2-4. 5 Asset Purchase Agreement, at Section 3. 6 xxxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M281/K394/281394942.PDF. participation hearing in May 2019.7 The Commission held evidentiary hearings on January 24June 5 and 6, 20222019, followed by the submission of Opening and Reply Briefs. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15On March 30, 2022. During 2020, the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a Proposed Decision Denying the Application (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE Proposed Decision”).8 Following issuance of the Proposed Decision, ex parte meetings took place between all parties and to DHKCommissioners and/or Commissioners’ staff. At In June 2020, all parties filed Comments on the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceedingProposed Decision, and those issues lacking consensus as in July 2020, all parties filed Reply Comments. On July 8, 2020, California American Water filed a Motion to whether they were appropriately Reopen the Record.9 The Public Advocates Office opposed the Motion to Reopen the Record.10 On August 5, 2020, the Commission granted the Motion to Reopen the Record and ordered California American Water to submit further valuation evidence and ordered all parties to engage in settlement discussions.11 That ruling was subsequently amended twice to, among other things, provide clarity on the procedure for California American Water to provide additional evidence.12 In July 2021, California American Water provided supplemental direct testimony that included within a condition-based assessment and a system valuation.13 As of the scope date of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NRSettlement Agreement, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served Advocates has not conducted discovery related to California American Water’s supplemental direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing All parties elected to focus their efforts on settlement discussion with the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued assistance of an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E Judge assigned to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(bfacilitate Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14October 17, 20212014, PG&E Tesla, acting as Lead participant, filed the Application with the Office [***] Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential Treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. pursuant to SB No. 1 and AB No. 1. The matter was designated as Docket No. 10-0000000. The Application is incorporated as part of Pacific Gas this Order as Attachment “A”. The Application included letters of support for the Application from the Storey County Commissioners’ Office, Storey County School District, the City of Reno and Electric Company the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada. • On October 20, 2014, pursuant to SB No. 1, the Office issued a notice of the Application and of the date, time and location of the public hearing at which the Application would be considered, to Tesla and other Participants in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedingthe Project commonly known as the “Gigafactory Project”; the Nevada Department of Taxation; the Nevada State Gaming Control Board; the governing body of the county, A.00-00-000 the board of trustees of the school district and the governing body of the city or town, if any, in which the Project is located; the governing body of any other political subdivision that the Office determined could experience a direct economic effect as a result of the abatement; and to the general public; and posted this notice on the Internet website for the Office. • On November 17, 2014, the Office filed a summary of the Application with the Board which is incorporated as part of this Order as Attachment “B”. • The Board conducted the public hearing on November 20, 2014, with Governor Bxxxx Xxxxxxxx presiding. Executive Director of the Office, Sxxxxx Xxxx, summarized the information provided in the Application, verified that the Application satisfied all applicable requirements of SB No. 1, and presented a finding that the Gigafactory Project is a Qualified Project, and eligible to participate in the incentives offered by SB No. 1 and AB No. 1 based upon information provided in the Application. Minutes related to the hearing on this Application are incorporated as part of this Order as Attachment “C”. • Following discussion by the Board, a motion (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationMotion”)) was made by Board member Kxxxxxxx Docket No. A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN 10-0000000 [***] Information has been omitted and WEM each filed timely protests or responses separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential Treatment has been requested with respect to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022omitted portions. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14September 8, 20211998, PG&E a document entitled the Unitil Restructuring Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") was executed and filed by the Application following parties (the “Settling Parties”): the Business and Industry Association of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 New Hampshire (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationBIA”). A4NR; Cabletron Systems, Cal AdvocatesInc. (“Cabletron”); Enron Energy Services, NCTCInc. (“Enron”); Freedom Partners, SLO CountyL.L.C. (“Freedom”); the Staff of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), TURN the Office of Consumer Advocate (“OCA”); the Retail Merchants Association of New Hampshire (“RMA”), and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Unitil Companies: Concord Electric Company (“SCECECo”), Exeter & Hampton Electric Company (“E&H”), Unitil Service Corp. (“USC”), and Unitil Power Corp. (“UPC”) (collectively “Unitil”).1 The Settlement Agreement was intended to resolve most of the contested issues pertaining to Unitil in our restructuring proceeding, DR 96-150, to provide retail access and customer choice for Unitil’s customers by March 1, 1999, and to terminate Unitil’s involvement in the ongoing Federal litigation.2 A duly noticed Prehearing Conference was held on September 18, 1998. Technical sessions were conducted on September 18 and September 24, 1998, and intervenor testimony was filed on October 7, 1998 by the Governor’s Office of 1In addition to the above-stated parties, the Commission granted intervention to the Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Service (“GOECS”), the Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights (“CRR”), State Representative Xxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx of PJA Energy Systems Designs, Granite State Electric Company (“GSEC”) and the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2Under the Settlement the parties agreed to disagree on two issues to be presented to the Commission for determination: 1) use of the Unitil name and logo; and 2) the allocation of partial payments between a motion supplier and the distribution company for party status consolidated billing under the Trading Partner Agreement. Energy and Community Services (“GOECS”), Enron, Staff and the OCA (jointly), and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx., P.E., Chief Engineer of the Commission. On October 12, 1998, the parties conducted a technical session and settlement conference and on February 15October 16, 2022Xxxxxx filed rebuttal testimony. As a result of the technical sessions and the settlement conference, Unitil and the other parties conducted further negotiations and agreed to an Amended Settlement on October 20, 1998. The Amended Settlement addressed a number of issues and concerns raised in the testimony of Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the GOECS, and Xx. Xxxxxxx. The parties to the Amended Settlement included all of the original signatories plus Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Representative Xxx Xxxxxxx, CRR, EnerDev, Inc., and Granite State Taxpayers, Inc. The Commission held evidentiary hearings on October 21, 22, and 23, 1998. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17hearings, 2022the Commission determined that the issue of transmission and distribution classification, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted party status to SCE addressed in Xx. Xxxxxxx’x testimony, would be bifurcated and to DHKseparately noticed. At In addition, the prehearing conference the parties specified issues Commission agreed to be within the scope Settling Parties’ recommendation that the two disputed issues - the use of proceedingthe "Unitil" name and logo, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within allocation of partial payments from customers - be briefed at a later date: November 12, 1998. The parties requested an oral decision of the scope of this proceedingCommission on the Amended Settlement by November 2, 1998. On April 19October 30, 20221998, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo Commission's General Counsel sent a letter to all parties advising that the Commission had sought clarification from the Company of certain language in the Settlement Agreement concerning the Fixed Wind Down Costs, and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established was providing all parties a copy of the issues memorandum response received from Unitil. The Commission invited any party seeking to comment upon the memorandum or object to its inclusion in the record as an exhibit to do so by 10:00 a.m. November 2, 1998. No comments or objections were received. On October 30, 1998, the Commission submitted a record request to Unitil for a schedule of the specific items, by FERC subaccount, to be considered included in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022Fixed Wind Down Costs. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December The Utility submitted its ESA application on September 14, 20212012 and its Smelter and Refinery applications on September 10, PG&E 2012. The ESA was filed under seal because the Application Utility Company considers it a confidential document. The Division of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.00-00-000 Public Utilities (“2021 NDCTP ApplicationDivision”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN ) and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company Office of Consumer Services (“SCEOffice”) filed separate memoranda on October 29, 2012, summarizing their respective analyses and expressing their recommendations regarding the ESA, and the Smelter and Refinery Agreements. As to the ESA, the Division recommended approval while the Office recommended a motion minor revision, i.e., that Kennecott should be subject to a Renewable Energy Credit (“REC”) Revenues Surcharge, if one is ordered, in addition to the REC Revenues Credit. As to the Smelter and Refinery Agreements, both the Division and the Office commented on the need to correct errors in Exhibit E (Pricing) of both agreements. These errors were initially identified by the Utility after it had filed its applications. On November 20, 2012, the Utility filed petitions asking the Commission to accept amendments to all three agreements, in response to the recommendations of the Division and Office. On that date, the Utility also filed a Settlement Stipulation (“Settlement”) executed by representatives of the Utility, the Division and the Office. The Settlement declares the parties’ support for party status Commission approval of the ESA, and the Smelter, and Refinery Agreements, as amended. The parties to the Settlement state that, with the amendments filed on February 15November 20, 20222012, each of the agreements is in the public interest and should be approved. On November 29, 2012, the Commission held a duly-noticed hearing in these three dockets. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxx granted hearing each party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference Settlement testified in support of the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceedingESA, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner Xxxxx issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.00-00-000, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1/ yak tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and Xxxxx Xxxxx moved for party status on March 7, 2022Smelter, and April 22Refinery Agreements, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20as amended, 2022. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with and recommended their approval. No party offered any other evidence. Consequently, at the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.00-00-000. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding conclusion of the issueshearing the Commissioners authorized the presiding officer to issue an oral ruling approving the three applications and the three agreements, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requestsas amended. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, XXX Xxxxx issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, XXX Xxxxx canceled the public participation hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3/This written order memorializes that oral ruling.