Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On February 9, 2005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and CenturyTel Fiber Company II, LLC (“CenturyTel”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the parties’ Interconnection Agreement dated February 2, 2005 (“Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx., on behalf of SBC, and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, on behalf of CenturyTel, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct. On March 21, 2005, Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in this proceeding and that no evidentiary hearings would be required. This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on April 6, 2005.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On February 9December 10, 20052004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and CenturyTel Fiber Company IINuvox Communications of Illinois, LLC Inc. (“CenturyTelNuvox”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Fourth Amendment to the parties’ Interconnection Agreement dated February December 2, 2005 2004 (“Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx., on behalf of SBC, and by Xxxxxx X. XxxxxXxxxxxx, on behalf of CenturyTelNuvox, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct. On March 21January 31, 2005, Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in this proceeding and that no evidentiary hearings would be required. This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on April 6February 1, 2005.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On February 9November 3 , 2005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell El Paso Telephone Company (“SBCEl Paso”) and CenturyTel Fiber Company IINPCR, LLC Inc., d/b/a Nextel Partners, as agent for Nextel WIP License Corp. and Nextel WIP Expansion Corp. (“CenturyTelNextel”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the parties’ Interconnection Agreement dated February 2, 2005 (“Amendment”)approval, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) . (“Act”), of an Agreement for Transportation and Termination of Traffic. The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement Statements in support of the petition was filed petition, along with verifications sworn to verifications, were filed by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx.Xxxx XxXxxxx, on behalf of SBCEl Paso, and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of CenturyTelNextel, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct. On March 21November 29, 2005, Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in this proceeding and that no evidentiary hearings would be required. This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on April 6December 1, 2005.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On February 925, 2005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 7632008, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (AT&T Illinois) (“SBCIBT”) and CenturyTel Fiber Company IISigecom, LLC d/b/a WOW! Internet, Cable and Phone (“CenturyTelSigecom”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the parties’ Interconnection Agreement dated February 2, 2005 (“Amendment”)approval, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) . (“Act”), of the 2nd Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement between IBT and Sigecom dated February 19, 2008. The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement Statements in support of the petition was filed petition, along with verifications sworn to verifications, were filed by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx.Xxxxxxx, on behalf of SBCIBT, and by Xxxxxx X. XxxxxXxxxx Xxxxxxxx, on behalf of CenturyTelSigecom, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct. On March 21April 23, 20052008, Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Sanjo Omoniyi of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in this proceeding and that no evidentiary hearings would be required. This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on April 625, 20052008.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On February 9August 3, 2005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and CenturyTel Fiber Company IInii communications, LLC Ltd. (“CenturyTelnii”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Third Amendment to the parties’ Interconnection Agreement dated February 2July 29, 2005 (“Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx., on behalf of SBC, and by Xxxxxx X. XxxxxXxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xx., on behalf of CenturyTelnii, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct. On March 21September 8, 2005, Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in this proceeding and that no evidentiary hearings would be required. This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on April 6September 9, 2005.