Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On June 13, 2005, Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. (“Odin”) and United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “US Cellular”) (Odin and US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a negotiated traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on or about May 13, 2005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The Agreement was filed with the joint petition and supported by the statement of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the parent company of Odin. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on July 6, 2005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Xxxx, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On June 13March 26, 20052002, Odin Illinois Bell Telephone ExchangeCompany (“Ameritech”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. (“Odin”) and United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “US CellularXxXxxx”) (Odin Xxxxxxxxx and US Cellular XxXxxx are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a the negotiated traffic termination portions of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on or about May 13dated March 26, 20052002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition and supported by is a statement in support of the statement of joint petition from Xxxx XxXxxxxXxxxxx, Assistant General Counsel Director-Negotiations for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the parent company of OdinSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on July 6April 10, 20052002. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Xxxx, US Cellular, Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunication’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On June 13, 2005, Odin Xxxxx City Telephone Exchange, Inc. Company (“OdinXxxxx”) and United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “US Cellular”) (Odin Xxxxx and US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a negotiated traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on or about May 13, 2005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The Agreement was filed with the joint petition and supported by the statement of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the parent company of OdinXxxxx. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on July 6, 2005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of XxxxXxxxx, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On June 13, 2005, Odin El Paso Telephone Exchange, Inc. Company (“OdinEl Paso”) and United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “US Cellular”) (Odin El Paso and US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a negotiated traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on or about May 13, 2005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The Agreement was filed with the joint petition and supported by the statement of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the parent company of OdinEl Paso. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on July 6, 2005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of XxxxEl Paso, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of Xxxxxxx A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.