Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17, 2002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and KBS Computer Services, Inc. (“KBS”) (Ameritech and KBS are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a negotiated interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated September 30, 2002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations and Interconnection. Petitioners’ October 17th filing was docketed as Docket No. 02-0676. On January 6, 2003, Petitioners filed a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to the aforementioned Agreement. A copy of the amendment as well as a statement in support of the amendment from Xxxx Xxxxxx accompanied the joint petition. The amendment specifically modifies the underlying Agreement by replacing the Appendix Performance Measurements in the underlying Agreement. Petitioners’ January 6th filing was docketed as Docket No. 03-0002. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on October 30, November 12, December 10, December 13, December 18, December 30, 2002, and January 8, 2003. Appearances were entered by KBS and by counsel on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). Docket Nos. 02-0676 and 03-0002 were consolidated at the request of Ameritech. At the conclusion of the January 8th hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17March 26, 2002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and KBS Computer McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. (“KBSXxXxxx”) (Ameritech Xxxxxxxxx and KBS XxXxxx are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a the negotiated portions of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated September 30March 26, 2002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations and Interconnection. Petitioners’ October 17th filing was docketed as Docket No. 02-0676. On January 6, 2003, Petitioners filed a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to the aforementioned Agreement. A copy of the amendment as well as a statement in support of the amendment from Xxxx Xxxxxx accompanied the joint petition. The amendment specifically modifies the underlying Agreement by replacing the Appendix Performance Measurements in the underlying Agreement. Petitioners’ January 6th filing was docketed as Docket No. 03-0002Negotiations. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on October 30, November 12, December April 10, December 13, December 18, December 30, 2002, and January 8, 2003. Appearances were entered by KBS and by counsel on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). Docket NosThe Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. 02-0676 and 03-0002 were consolidated at In the request Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of Ameritechthe Agreement. At the conclusion of the January 8th hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 1724, 2002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and KBS Computer ServicesDelta Phones, Inc. (“KBSDelta”) (Ameritech and KBS Delta are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of a negotiated interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated September 30October 8, 2002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell TelephoneAmeritech Services, L.P. d/b/a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Inc./Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations and InterconnectionIndustry Markets. Petitioners’ October 17th 24th filing was docketed as Docket No. 02-06760695. On January 6December 23, 20032002, Petitioners filed a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to the aforementioned Agreement. A copy of the amendment as well as a statement in support of the amendment from Xxxx Xxxxxx accompanied the joint petition. The amendment specifically modifies the underlying Agreement by replacing the Appendix Performance Measurements in the underlying Agreement. Petitioners’ January 6th December 23rd filing was docketed as Docket No. 0302-00020860. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on October 30, November 12, December 10November 26, December 13November 27, December 18, and December 30, 2002, and January 8, 2003. Appearances were entered by KBS and by counsel on behalf of Ameritech Ameritech, Delta, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). Docket Nos. 02-0676 0695 and 0302-0002 0860 were consolidated at the request of Ameritech. At the conclusion of the January 8th December 30th hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 17February 24, 20022006, Illinois Bell Mid-Century Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and KBS Computer ServicesCooperative, Inc. (“KBSMid-Century”) ), and GTE Wireless of the Midwest Incorporated, Chicago SMSA LP, Illinois SMSA Limited, Partnership, Chicago 10 MHZ LLC, Illinois RSA 1 Limited Partnership, Illinois, RSA 6 and 7 Limited Partnership, Rockford MSA Limited Partnership, and Cellco Partnership for itself and as agent for Southern and Central Wireless, LLC (Ameritech and KBS are referred to collectively as collectively, “PetitionersVerizon Wireless”) ), filed with this Commission a joint petition for approval, under Section 252 of the Illinois Commerce Commission Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. (“CommissionFederal Act”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval ), of a negotiated telecommunications interconnection agreement entitled a “Traffic Termination Agreement” (“Agreement”) dated September 30). On March 15, 2002, pursuant Mid-Century and Verizon Wireless amended the petition to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) remove one of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seqVerizon Wireless affiliates as a petitioner. A copy The amended petition did not alter any substantive elements of the original petition. The Agreement contains terms that were determined by the Commission in its Arbitration Decision in consolidated Dockets 05-0644, 05-0645, 05-0646, 05-0647, 05- 0648, 05-0649 and 05-0657. The Arbitration Decision directed Mid-Century and Verizon Wireless to file their complete Agreement for Commission approval. The Agreement was filed submitted with the joint instant petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement Statements in support of the joint petition, along with sworn verifications, were filed by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, on behalf of Mid-Century, and by Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, on behalf of Verizon Wireless, stating that the facts contained in the petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations are true and Interconnection. Petitioners’ October 17th filing was docketed as Docket No. 02-0676correct. On January 6March 10, 20032006, Petitioners Staff filed a verified joint petition seeking the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to the aforementioned Agreement. A copy of the amendment as well as a statement in support of the amendment from Xxxx Xxxxxx accompanied the joint petition. The amendment specifically modifies the underlying Agreement by replacing the Appendix Performance Measurements in the underlying Agreement. Petitioners’ January 6th filing was docketed as Docket No. 03-0002Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to due noticethe rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before was assigned to a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Commission at its offices Commission. The ALJ determined that there were no disputed issues in Springfield, Illinois on October 30, November 12, December 10, December 13, December 18, December 30, 2002, this proceeding and January 8, 2003that no evidentiary hearings would be required. Appearances No intervention petitions were entered by KBS and by counsel on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”)filed. Docket Nos. 02-0676 and 03-0002 were consolidated at the request of Ameritech. At the conclusion of the January 8th hearing the record This matter was marked “Heard and Taken” on March 15, 2006.” No petitions to intervene were received.