Program Methodology Sample Clauses

Program Methodology. The SWM management program was based on a methodology utilized previously to great effect by CHF International in a similar program in Port au Prince in the 1990s, modified to meet the current local circumstances. The program maximized local community participation to create the work teams that collected the solid waste, relied on private sector contractors to transport the collected solid waste, and partnered with government authorities at the landfill for the disposal of the waste. Building on CHF’s past solid waste and job creation experience in Haiti The SWM program of 2004-2005 replicated the successful methodology employed by CHF in Port-au-Prince in the mid-1990s. During this period, CHF International was one of the principal solid waste management and job creation actors in Haiti. From 1993 to 1995, CHF helped collect over 342,000 cubic meters of solid waste and provided employment to 3,274 Haitian workers with funding from USAID. CHF closed the temporary La Saline landfill, built and opened the Truitier landfill and increased the private sector’s involvement in the solid waste collection process. In the neighborhoods of Solino and Carrefour, CHF organized community groups on pre-collection activities while educating the community about the hazards of disposing waste near their homes. From 1995 to 2000, CHF also worked on very large infrastructure rehabilitation and clean up activities in Port-au-Prince and in most major Haitian cities, with funding from the Inter-American Development Bank, the Fonds d’Assistance Economique et Sociale (FAES) and the Unité Centrale de Gestion (UCG). Under SWM, the basic collection/transportation/disposal methodology was to pair one collection vehicle, usually a 5 ton dump truck or similar non-specialized construction hauling vehicle, with a team of approximately 20 waste collection workers and one supervisor. Each of these teams worked in a predetermined area to collect the trash around a series of waste collection sites (the “poubel fatra” mentioned above) and loaded it into the trucks. For quality control purposes, after collection, but before transportation, CHF engineering staff measured the amount of trash collected in each vehicle. This amount was then compared that to the amount delivered by the truck to the landfill facility. Waste haulers were only paid for waste delivered to the landfill facility. At the peak of the program CHF had dozens of such teams spread throughout the metropolitan area each day. CHF ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Program Methodology

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C.1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System.

  • Cost for Service and Charge Methodology – POS to The NWSA Service Area and Department (Acct if appropriate) Service Item (from list above) Method of Charges1 Basis for Charge Hourly Rate, Fixed Percentage or Formula 2021 Budgeted Amount2 Commission Office Dept #1200 3.a Fixed Based upon agreed amount of $250,000 per year. $250,000

  • Promotion Procedure The rate of pay of an employee promoted shall be established in the new pay range at the nearest step which exceeds the existing rate by at least five (5) percent, but shall not exceed the maximum of that pay range except that whenever the rate of pay prior to promotion is above the maximum of the pay range established for the position to which the employee is being promoted, the present rate shall be retained.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!