Proposal Analysis Sample Clauses

Proposal Analysis. This section presents a summary of the results extracted in [12]. The data re- sulting from the set of 242 ECHORD proposals (one full copy resubmission was excluded from the complete set of 243) involves a total of 509 proponents, 264 in- stitutions and 26 countries. The ECHORD core consortium lowered the entrance barrier by allowing single partner and single country proposals. The results pre- sented in Fig. 1 show that, even in small projects (typically 18 months and 300k€ ), single partner projects have worse quality than multi-partner propo- sals: 48.1% versus 25,5% (χ2(1) = 8.014; p = 0.005). In fact, the probability of a proposal with two or more partners to have a score above or equal to 10 is 2.717 times higher than in case of a single partner proposal (Odds-Ratio=2.717, IC95%[1.389;5.316]). In terms of international cooperation, the ratio of proponents that partici- pated in proposals whose evaluation score is above 10 with international coop- eration is similar to the ratio for single country proposals. From these values one might conclude that the common mandatory requirement of multi-country proposals for EU financing may indeed promote the participation from peripheral countries but does not have a direct influence on the quality of the proposals. From the analysis of the network of institution-level co-authorship, see Fig. 2, two conclusions were identified: (1) the clusters and the key players (with a (a) (b) Fig. 1: Distribution of proposals per number of partners (a) and proposals per number of countries (b) relevant number of connections or playing inter-cluster connections - labelled in Fig. 2) are organized geographically; (2) in addition to the major European robotics manufacturers (ABB, KUKA, REIS, COMAU, SCHUNK) there is a new group of key players that are small robot hardware suppliers with highly differentiating products coming from countries without significant tradition in this area, such as Spain, Austria and UK (Robotnik, FerRobotics, Shadow Robot Company).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Proposal Analysis

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • Industrial Operations Analyst (IOA ‌ The IOA is a GSA Government official who audits Contractor records and conducts Contractor Assistance Visits (CAVs) to the Contractor’s place of business to assist the Contractor with task order reporting, Contract Access Fee (CAF) management, and other general contract administration functions deemed necessary by the Government.

  • Reverse Engineering The Customer must not reverse assemble or reverse compile or directly or indirectly allow or cause a third party to reverse assemble or reverse compile the whole or any part of the software or any products supplied as a part of the Licensed System.

  • LIS Forecasting 7.2.2.8.1 Both CLEC and Qwest shall work in good faith to define a mutually agreed upon forecast of LIS trunking.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.