Scenarios. A roommate has invited a member of the opposite sex back to his/her room. How would you handle the situation? • You have a couple of roommates who do not participate in any apartment-related activities. They separate themselves from the group and spend time in their room(s). What would you do to build unity in your apartment? • A certain roommate has poor personal hygiene practices and seldom showers or performs any self-care. Sometimes the roommate’s body odor is offensive to you and others in the apartment. How would you approach this roommate and what would you do to help? • One roommate is casual about keeping curfew and often comes in late. You’ve tried to teach this roommate in a lighthearted, casual way but he/she has not changed his/her behavior. What do you do now? • On Sundays you’ve noticed that a roommate or two violate dress and grooming standards for church meetings. For example, the skirt is shorter than it is on weekdays or the facial hair is more prominent on Sundays than on any other day of the week. What would you do? • You notice that a roommate has some edgy posters, DVDs, and reading material in his/her room. He/she is often up late on the computer and you suspect that he/she is involved in viewing pornography. What action would you take? • Your neighbors are planning a costume party that is reported to include a DJ, black lights, and “crazy” music. You’ve been invited but feel that the party is not going to reflect BYU-Idaho standards for dress and behavior. What would you do? • You are aware of a roommate who is engaging in activities of self-harm. He/she has had a rough home life and you know that he/she is struggling emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually. How would you address this situation? • A friend is planning a co-ed camping trip next weekend. You are invited to attend. This is not a campus- or xxxx-sponsored event and you know that it compromises a university standard. What would you do? • An engaged roommate has his/her fiancée over for several hours every day. They eat lunch and dinner together (often leaving a mess) and have taken up “residency” on the couch. There is seldom a time that the fiancée is not present. You’re beginning to feel uncomfortable in your own apartment. What would you do? • You have two roommates who seem to always be watching TV shows or movies that portray sexuality, intense violence, and/or use profanity including taking the Lord’s name in vain. You’re a bit scared to approach these roomm...
Scenarios. The Parties hereby agree that all Scenarios existing as of the Effective Date, and not subject to use or license restrictions in any agreement between VirTra and a third party, are accurately described in Exhibit H, and are considered part of the VirTra Software and the Integrated Software hereunder. Where VirTra develops or has developed additional Scenarios after the Effective Date, VirTra shall promptly notify Modern Round, and such additional Scenarios shall be deemed part of VirTra Software. Modern Round may from time to time develop its own Scenarios, which shall be owned solely by Modern Round, and Modern Round shall have no obligation to use any Scenarios provided by VirTra; provided, however, that any [****]. VirTra hereby agrees that it shall develop and deliver additional Scenarios as set forth in the Development Plan during the Term of this Agreement.
Scenarios. Here different scenarios can be designed. The scenarios are defined by their variations to the reference sce- xxxxx that has been defined in the Demands, Supply, Storages and Introduction and setup parts. You can choose how many scenarios you want to make, as well as how many variations should be made in each scenario. • How many scenarios do you want to make?: Set how many scenarios you want to make. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below. • How many variations do you want to make?: Set how many variations you want to make on the refer- ence in each scenario. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. It is important to remember that some technologies are defined by more than one input, such as electricity storage, and it is important to include all relevant inputs of a technology that one wants to change. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below.
Scenarios. This section presents an evolved description of the scenarios from D3.1 with a mapping to the presented FLAME architecture and the use cases above. Throughout all scenarios, we will represent each media component by a unique FQDN using the naming convention <COMPONENT_ACRONYM>.xxxxxxxx_xxxx.xxxxx.xx Furthermore, each relationship connector between two media components illustrates a direction representing the component that initiates and the component which serves. This information flow is reflected in the naming of the require service level agreement between two media components, i.e.: <SERVING_MEDIA_COMPONENT><INITIATING_MEDIA_COMPONENT>
Scenarios. Nowadays, security threats are not far away from us. Political leaders try to respond to these threats with a set of initiatives that will be implemented as a global strategy in the field of security and defence. In this way, stronger relations between the EU and NATO will hopefully be developed and so it can enable Member States to engage in defence research and offer defence capabilities. The European security and defence union has been gradually built to protect citizens and to make them feel and be safe. To fully achieve this, progress in various areas is required (Xxxxxx, 2009). First of all, as Member States are becoming more sovereign in the current globalised world, more cooperation within the European Union – including on defence – is needed. However, Member States have to fully respect the other countries‘ constitutional rights and responsibilities (Xxxxxx, 2009). Secondly, there have been differences in threat perceptions and strategic cultures over time. We now face transnational threats and hybrid ones, as well as suffering from the impact of conflicts in surrounding regions. A security and defence union has to encourage a common understanding of threats as well as a stronger alignment of strategic cultures. Then it will be able to give appropriate responses, because it requires joint decision-making actions and financial solidarity at European level (Xxxxxx, 2009; Xxxxxx, 2008). Thirdly, the nature of the transatlantic relationship is expanding, because of the reason that European countries have to take greater responsibility for their own security. The EU and NATO will continue to cooperation on hard and soft security (Troitiño, 2014). The EU will provide this within the Member States, so they can strengthen their defence and address their shortcomings. This approach will give the EU Member States the change to charge their own security to a greater extent which will make it easier to contribute to international peace and security (Xxxxxxxxx, 2007). Fourth, the scope and efficiency of defence spending has to be increased. Interoperability of defence equipment can be affected by duplications between Member States. This can also lead to a lack of preparation of armed forces and gaps in defence capabilities. To get a better view of this, Member States should coordinate their defence spending better. The biggest part of financial resources for defence will continue to come from national sources. How the current limitations to the common financin...
Scenarios. Three scenarioswere identified which are both scientifically challenging and com- mercially relevant. They represent comprehensive sets of challenges in an illus- trative way, so that robotics experts can easily relate their own research to them. The scenarios build on each other. – The first scenario of ECHORD is the human-robot co-worker. In this scenario, the traditional idea of pre-programmed robots was dropped, and the robot interacts with a human towards achieving a common goal. This scenario is especially relevant for future industrial applications, where the (physical or sensor-based) fences between robots and humans disappear. – The second scenario is the hyper-flexible cells scenario. This scenario envisages not only one or more highly dexterous and cooperative robots, but also the hardware and software integration of the robots with an automatic warehouse system and the other devices present in the cell. – The third scenario is the cognitive factory. This scenario aimed at taking the classical concept of the flexible manufacturing systems to a new level. The final goal is to create environments which configure themselves and are fault-tolerant, and which contain autonomous robots jointly participating in the production process with their human counterparts.
Scenarios. All experiments will be run in four different scenarios. No RINA Network: This scenario uses triggers from the operators OSS/NMS (here simulated by a skeleton application) to benchmark the DMS strategy execution. All developed strategies will be tested for speed and scale. The DMS will be a stand-alone DMS as shown in Figure 11. Minimum RINA Network: This scenario uses the minimum RINA network (2 hosts, 2 border routers, 1 interior router, cf. Figure 13) with an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. Medium Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a medium size RINA network, for instance the European network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 21 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. MS1 M16 DMS Software with Strategy Executor, OSS/NMS trigger, MA/Demonstrator Integration MS2 M17 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS3 M18 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS4 M19 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS5 M20 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS6 M21 reference experiment with measurements on LMI reference server MS7 M22 continuous experiments for scenario 1 (benchmarking) MS8 M24 continuous experiments for scenario 2 (minimal RINA network) MS9 M26 continuous experiments for scenario 3 (medium size RINA network) MS10 M28 continuous experiments for scenario 4 (large size RINA network) DRAFT Large Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a large size RINA network, for instance the US network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 22 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12.
Scenarios. 1- The Agreement - Framework Agreement will be developed in the respective Headquarters of each Institution, or in those others that are agreed with third parties, (previous acceptance of both signatories of this agreement).
Scenarios. 3.4.1 Scenario 1: Proof (certification) of privacy compliance using ONTOCHAIN ecosystem
3.4.2 Scenario 2: Privacy compliance through design in ONTOCHAIN ecosystem
4.1. ONTOROPA IN ONTOCHAIN ECOSYSTEM
4.1.1 OntoROPA and ONTOCHAIN challenges
4.1.2 OntoROPA and ONTOCHAIN requirements 4.1.3 OntoROPA synergies with ONTOCHAIN architectural components OntoROPA can benefit from the projects which are able to provide innovative methods as follows: What OntoROPA offer to other projects?
1) OntoROPA is a true use case, based on the experience of professionals working with ROPAs, with an approach that captures real needs of our society. This makes it an excellent use case for other projects that propose innovative technological solutions within ONTOCHAIN.
2) In addition, OntoROPA can help projects that handle personal data detecting the need for ROPA to comply with privacy requirements and create such ROPA if necessary.
Scenarios. 6.1 Short-Term Spruce Fertilization Fertilization of all spruce leading stands between 40 and 80 years of age with site index values between 15 and 24. Fertilization is assumed to occur within the first five years of the planning horizon. • Time Frame: All fertilization application in the first five years of the planning horizon • Number of applications: one fertilization application • Treatment Area: TBD • Treatment Cost: $468 / ha.
6.2 Long-Term Fertilization Strategy A long-term fertilization program of age class 4, 5 and 6 spruce and pine leading stands with site index values between 15 and 24 • Time Frame: On-going fertilization treatment over the 250 year planning horizon. The model will select which stands to apply the treatment to, based on the objective of maximizing harvest volume. • Number of applications: three fertilization applications at 40, 50 and 60 years of age.
