Scenarios. A roommate has invited a member of the opposite sex back to his/her room. How would you handle the situation? • You have a couple of roommates who do not participate in any apartment-related activities. They separate themselves from the group and spend time in their room(s). What would you do to build unity in your apartment? • A certain roommate has poor personal hygiene practices and seldom showers or performs any self-care. Sometimes the roommate’s body odor is offensive to you and others in the apartment. How would you approach this roommate and what would you do to help? • One roommate is casual about keeping curfew and often comes in late. You’ve tried to teach this roommate in a lighthearted, casual way but he/she has not changed his/her behavior. What do you do now? • On Sundays you’ve noticed that a roommate or two violate dress and grooming standards for church meetings. For example, the skirt is shorter than it is on weekdays or the facial hair is more prominent on Sundays than on any other day of the week. What would you do? • You notice that a roommate has some edgy posters, DVDs, and reading material in his/her room. He/she is often up late on the computer and you suspect that he/she is involved in viewing pornography. What action would you take? • Your neighbors are planning a costume party that is reported to include a DJ, black lights, and “crazy” music. You’ve been invited but feel that the party is not going to reflect BYU-Idaho standards for dress and behavior. What would you do? • You are aware of a roommate who is engaging in activities of self-harm. He/she has had a rough home life and you know that he/she is struggling emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually. How would you address this situation? • A friend is planning a co-ed camping trip next weekend. You are invited to attend. This is not a campus- or xxxx-sponsored event and you know that it compromises a university standard. What would you do? • An engaged roommate has his/her fiancée over for several hours every day. They eat lunch and dinner together (often leaving a mess) and have taken up “residency” on the couch. There is seldom a time that the fiancée is not present. You’re beginning to feel uncomfortable in your own apartment. What would you do? • You have two roommates who seem to always be watching TV shows or movies that portray sexuality, intense violence, and/or use profanity including taking the Lord’s name in vain. You’re a bit scared to approach these roomm...
Scenarios. The Parties hereby agree that all Scenarios existing as of the Effective Date, and not subject to use or license restrictions in any agreement between VirTra and a third party, are accurately described in Exhibit H, and are considered part of the VirTra Software and the Integrated Software hereunder. Where VirTra develops or has developed additional Scenarios after the Effective Date, VirTra shall promptly notify Modern Round, and such additional Scenarios shall be deemed part of VirTra Software. Modern Round may from time to time develop its own Scenarios, which shall be owned solely by Modern Round, and Modern Round shall have no obligation to use any Scenarios provided by VirTra; provided, however, that any [****]. VirTra hereby agrees that it shall develop and deliver additional Scenarios as set forth in the Development Plan during the Term of this Agreement.
Scenarios. Three scenarioswere identified which are both scientifically challenging and com- mercially relevant. They represent comprehensive sets of challenges in an illus- trative way, so that robotics experts can easily relate their own research to them. The scenarios build on each other. – The first scenario of ECHORD is the human-robot co-worker. In this scenario, the traditional idea of pre-programmed robots was dropped, and the robot interacts with a human towards achieving a common goal. This scenario is especially relevant for future industrial applications, where the (physical or sensor-based) fences between robots and humans disappear. – The second scenario is the hyper-flexible cells scenario. This scenario envisages not only one or more highly dexterous and cooperative robots, but also the hardware and software integration of the robots with an automatic warehouse system and the other devices present in the cell. – The third scenario is the cognitive factory. This scenario aimed at taking the classical concept of the flexible manufacturing systems to a new level. The final goal is to create environments which configure themselves and are fault-tolerant, and which contain autonomous robots jointly participating in the production process with their human counterparts.
Scenarios. Here different scenarios can be designed. The scenarios are defined by their variations to the reference sce- xxxxx that has been defined in the Demands, Supply, Storages and Introduction and setup parts. You can choose how many scenarios you want to make, as well as how many variations should be made in each scenario. Figure 26 Screenshot of the “Scenarios” in Simulation interface • How many scenarios do you want to make?: Set how many scenarios you want to make. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below. • How many variations do you want to make?: Set how many variations you want to make on the refer- ence in each scenario. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. It is important to remember that some technologies are defined by more than one input, such as electricity storage, and it is important to include all relevant inputs of a technology that one wants to change. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below.
Scenarios. This section presents an evolved description of the scenarios from D3.1 with a mapping to the presented FLAME architecture and the use cases above. Throughout all scenarios, we will represent each media component by a unique FQDN using the naming convention <COMPONENT_ACRONYM>.xxxxxxxx_xxxx.xxxxx.xx Furthermore, each relationship connector between two media components illustrates a direction representing the component that initiates and the component which serves. This information flow is reflected in the naming of the require service level agreement between two media components, i.e.: <SERVING_MEDIA_COMPONENT><INITIATING_MEDIA_COMPONENT>
Scenarios. All experiments will be run in four different scenarios. No RINA Network: This scenario uses triggers from the operators OSS/NMS (here simulated by a skeleton application) to benchmark the DMS strategy execution. All developed strategies will be tested for speed and scale. The DMS will be a stand-alone DMS as shown in Figure 11. Minimum RINA Network: This scenario uses the minimum RINA network (2 hosts, 2 border routers, 1 interior router, cf. Figure 13) with an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. Medium Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a medium size RINA network, for instance the European network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 21 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. Milestone Month Description MS1 M16 DMS Software with Strategy Executor, OSS/NMS trigger, MA/Demonstrator Integration MS2 M17 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS3 M18 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS4 M19 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS5 M20 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS6 M21 reference experiment with measurements on LMI reference server MS7 M22 continuous experiments for scenario 1 (benchmarking) MS8 M24 continuous experiments for scenario 2 (minimal RINA network) MS9 M26 continuous experiments for scenario 3 (medium size RINA network) MS10 M28 continuous experiments for scenario 4 (large size RINA network) Table 1: Milestones for experiment 1 DRAFT Large Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a large size RINA network, for instance the US network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 22 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12.
Scenarios. The road to the December 21 elections is still difficult to foresee. The imprisonment of members of the Catalan government, as well as those in effective exile in Brussels, shows that the elections are not going to be held, for better or for worse, in a normal context. Yet this is precisely the key to the situation. We must not accept the dynamics imposed by Rajoy as normal.
Scenarios. 1- The Agreement - Framework Agreement will be developed in the respective Headquarters of each Institution, or in those others that are agreed with third parties, (previous acceptance of both signatories of this agreement).
Scenarios. 1. A one-story building is being prepared for renovation. The building is 12 ft high, 50 ft by 100 ft with a flat roof. ACM to be removed includes perimeter roof flashing about 2 feet wide around the entire roof, exterior transite siding on all 4 sides from roof to the ground, and approximately 300 linear ft of one inch pipe insulation including 10 elbows from the crawlspace. The piping insulation and elbows may be either glove-bagged or abated under negative pressure as the contractor chooses. The piping insulation will be abated, but the pipe will remain. There are also 10 window units painted with lead-based paint which will require removal and disposal. The building will not be occupied during abatement. Contractor must perform OSHA required personnel air monitoring and submit any required notifications. Owner will provide power, water, parking, and will conduct all necessary environmental and clearance sampling.
Scenarios. 1. The employer sends its employees to take testing at an onsite facility or during working hours. Each employee is entitled to regular wages and fringes per contract for time required. The PIPE Committee will reimburse the contractor for the actual cost of the test and the equivalent of the stipend.
