Qualitative Rating. The Project Development Plan will be reviewed and will be assigned a qualitative rating for each of the evaluation subfactors in accordance with the following table:
Qualitative Rating. Adjective Rating Description Excellent The Proposal greatly exceeds the stated requirements / objectives, offering material benefits and/or added value and providing assurance that a consistently outstanding level of quality will be achieved. There is very little or no risk that the Proposer’s team would fail to satisfy the requirements of the Project. Weaknesses, if any, are very minor and can be readily corrected. Significant unique and/or innovative characteristics are present. Very Good The Proposal significantly exceeds the stated requirements / objectives, offering advantages, benefits and/or added value and providing assurance that a level of quality will be achieved that is materially better than acceptable. There is little risk in that Proposer’s team would fail to satisfy the requirements of the Project. Weaknesses, if any, are very minor and can be readily corrected. Some unique and/or innovative characteristics are present. Good The Proposal materially exceeds the stated requirements / objectives and provides assurance that the level of quality will meet or exceed minimum requirements. There may be a slight probability of risk that Proposer’s team may fail to satisfy the requirements of the Project. Weaknesses are correctable or acceptable per minimum standards. Fair The Proposal marginally exceeds stated requirements / objectives and provides satisfactory assurance that the level of quality will meet or marginally exceed minimum requirements. There may be questions about the likelihood of success and there is risk that the Proposer may fail to satisfy the requirements of the Project. Weaknesses are correctable or acceptable pre minimum standards. Meets Minimum The Proposal meets stated requirements / objectives and provides satisfactory assurance that the minimum level of quality will be achieved. There may be questions about the likelihood of success and there is some risk that Proposer’s team may fail to satisfy the requirements of the Project. Weaknesses are correctable or acceptable per minimum standards.
