Quasi-mandatory systems Sample Clauses

Quasi-mandatory systems. In a subset of market-based systems, financial institutions generally require coverage for at least some climate-related hazards as a precondition for mortgages. These conditions create a de facto mandatory underwriting requirement, even though by linking national coverage rates to estate purchases. Thus, national penetration rates may fluctuate according to the trends of the domestic housing market, in systems based on NATCAT insurance as a requirement for mortgage. The Polish system of disaster risk management has evolved from the fall of the socialist political and economic regimes in eastern and central Europe, in a similar fashion to the Czech Republic and Slovakia, presenting now relatively high penetration rates of private insurance. Disaster risk management had been treated as a secondary issue during the overhaul of the social, political and institutional system of Poland after the fall of the Eastern Bloc and the joining of the EU. It was the flood of 1997, and the adherence to the common European market to give force to reforms. The catastrophic flood of 1997 triggered a deep revision of the system, and there was an (unsuccessful) attempt to institute a countrywide universal mandatory insurance provision for every household (Xxxxxxx et al., 2016). Political opposition at the time maintained that it would have eventually diminished the effectiveness of recovery. However, the 1-in-200-year event pushed the state to enact considerable investments in flood defence infrastructures on national and regional levels. The building of the modern policy framework for disaster risk management comes with the drawing of the Water Act of 2001 (Polish Journal of Laws January 1, 2002) and the accession to the EU. The Implementation of the EU Floods directive brought the development of flood hazard and damage maps and risk management plans (Xxxxxxx et al., 2016). After a second large flooding event in 2010, Poland saw a renewed attempt to xxxxxx its risk management capacity. There was a second (also unsuccessful) attempt to draft a compulsory catastrophe insurance law, foreseeing the two state-owned companies (PZU and Warta) to offer standalone insurance to every homeowner, while partially reinsuring the risk of the international markets. Meanwhile, the Water Law was amended, including flood risk maps, designed by the State Water Company Wody Polskie, into local zoning plans (Xxxxxxx, 2012). This gave local governments the ability to deny construction rights in hi...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Quasi-mandatory systems

  • Insurance The Company and the Subsidiaries are insured by insurers of recognized financial responsibility against such losses and risks and in such amounts as are prudent and customary in the businesses in which the Company and the Subsidiaries are engaged, including, but not limited to, directors and officers insurance coverage. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has any reason to believe that it will not be able to renew its existing insurance coverage as and when such coverage expires or to obtain similar coverage from similar insurers as may be necessary to continue its business without a significant increase in cost.

  • Force Majeure If by reason of Force Majeure, either party hereto shall be rendered unable wholly or in part to carry out its obligations under this Agreement then such party shall give notice and full particulars of Force Majeure in writing to the other party within a reasonable time after occurrence of the event or cause relied upon, and the obligation of the party giving such notice, so far as it is affected by such Force Majeure, shall be suspended during the continuance of the inability then claimed, except as hereinafter provided, but for no longer period, and such party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. Choice of Law The Agreement between the Vendor and TIPS/ESC Region 8 and any addenda or other additions resulting from this procurement process, however described, shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, regardless of any conflict of laws principles. Venue, Jurisdiction and Service of Process Any Proceeding arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract issued by TIPS resulting from or any contemplated transaction shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Camp County, Texas and each of the parties irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of said court in any such proceeding, waives any objection it may now or hereafter have to venue or to convenience of forum, agrees that all claims in respect of the Proceeding shall be heard and determined only in any such court, and agrees not to bring any proceeding arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction in any other court. The parties agree that either or both of them may file a copy of this paragraph with any court as written evidence of the knowing, voluntary and freely bargained for agreement between the parties irrevocably to waive any objections to venue or to convenience of forum. Process in any Proceeding referred to in the first sentence of this Section may be served on any party anywhere in the world. Venue for any dispute resolution process, other than litigation, between TIPS and the Vendor shall be located in Camp or Xxxxx County, Texas.

  • WHEREAS the Trust is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"); and

  • Confidentiality (a) Subject to Section 7.15(c), during the Term and for a period of three

  • Definitions For purposes of this Agreement:

  • Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is to identify the terms and conditions of the relationship between TIPS and Vendor. Public entities and qualifying non-profits that properly join or utilize TIPS (“TIPS Members”) may elect to “piggyback” off of TIPS’ procurements and agreements where the laws of their jurisdiction allow. TIPS Members are not contractual parties to this Agreement although terms and conditions of this Agreement may ensure benefits to TIPS Members.

  • Termination This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing:

  • Miscellaneous The Vendor acknowledges and agrees that continued participation in TIPS is subject to TIPS sole discretion and that any Vendor may be removed from the participation in the Program at any time with or without cause. Nothing in the Agreement or in any other communication between TIPS and the Vendor may be construed as a guarantee that TIPS or TIPS Members will submit any orders at any time. TIPS reserves the right to request additional proposals for items or services already on Agreement at any time.

  • Notices Any notice, request or other document required or permitted to be given or delivered to the Holder by the Company shall be delivered in accordance with the notice provisions of the Purchase Agreement.

  • MODIFICATION This Agreement shall not be changed, modified, terminated, or discharged, in whole or in part, except by an instrument in writing signed by both parties hereto, or their respective successors or assignees.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.