Question Answering on Dialogue Sample Clauses

Question Answering on Dialogue. ‌ There have been a number of attempts made in the Natural Language Pro- cessing community on Question Answering challenges with a variety of texts and questions. The specific classifications of the questions will be discussed in Chapter 2.1. The texts on the other hand, vary by size and types. Some data-sets simply provide a knowledge base containing quantities of passages as context, which requires the model to use Information Retrieval models to filter relevant passages to a specific question. Examples of this kind in- cludes Quasar-T (Question Answering by Search and Reading) [4], which is based on Trivia question set with 100 passages collected for each question; Search QA [5], which is based on Jeopardy! question set with 50 web articles collected for each question. Other data-sets provide more specific passages, usually annotated from non-fiction writings or descriptive articles. Examples of this kind include SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset) [8], which is annotated from Wikipedia articles. Regardless of the corpus size, all of the passages selected by previous work feature non-fictional, descriptive or scholarly writings as relevant context to the questions raised. Very little work has been conducted on Question Answering with dialogue as context. Dialog data is significant, because not only it is available in large quantity, but also the quantity is growing rapidly. There were approximately 21.9 billion online messages sent each day in the year of 2017, an increase of 17% increase from an daily average of 18.7 billion from the year of 2016[10]. This resource only recently became available due to the rapid growth of information technology. The ultimate aim of this project is to collect a robust question answering data-set based on dialogue data as well as to explore ways of attempting the Question Answering challenge on this data set.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Question Answering on Dialogue

  • Additional Information for Product Development Projects Outcome of product development efforts, such copyrights and license agreements. • Units sold or projected to be sold in California and outside of California. • Total annual sales or projected annual sales (in dollars) of products developed under the Agreement. • Investment dollars/follow-on private funding as a result of Energy Commission funding. • Patent numbers and applications, along with dates and brief descriptions.  Additional Information for Product Demonstrations: • Outcome of demonstrations and status of technology. • Number of similar installations. • Jobs created/retained as a result of the Agreement.

  • Application for Promotion Employees who have successfully completed their initial probationary period may make application for any Job Posting provided they meet the minimum, stated qualifications for the involved position; provided, however, that employees who have failed a promotional probationary period in a classification shall not be permitted to take an examination for promotion to that classification within twelve (12) months of the date of such failure.

  • Preparatory Contract Negotiations Meetings Where operational requirements permit, the Employer will grant leave without pay to an employee to attend preparatory contract negotiations meetings.

  • Notification to Unsuccessful Job Applicants The parties agree that any unsuccessful candidate for an ONA job posting will be notified, in writing, within one (1) week of the decision being made and prior to the posting of the name of the successful candidate. The parties further agree that the above notification will be copied to the ONA Bargaining Unit President.

  • Problem Solving Employees and supervisors are encouraged to attempt to resolve on an informal basis, at the earliest opportunity, a problem that could lead to a grievance. If the matter is not resolved by informal discussion, or a problem-solving meeting does not occur, it may be settled in accordance with the grievance procedure. Unless mutually agreed between the Employer and the Union problem-solving discussions shall not extend the deadlines for filing a grievance. The Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, either with the employee or alone, shall present to the appropriate supervisor a written request for a meeting. If the supervisor agrees to a problem- solving meeting, this meeting shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the request. The supervisor, employee, Union Xxxxxxx, and up to one (1) other management person shall attempt to resolve the problem through direct and forthright communication. If another member of management is present that person will not be hearing the grievance at Step Two, should it progress to that Step. The employee, the Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, may participate in problem-solving activities on paid time, in accordance with Article 31, Union Rights, Section 1H.

  • PRICE LISTS AND PRODUCT INFORMATION Contractors should provide an electronic version of the proposed price list in an Excel format or pdf on a jump drive. Also provide a dealer list, if applicable in an Excel format with "read and write" capabilities on the same jump drive. No costs or expenses associated with providing this information in the required format shall be charged to the State of Arkansas. At the time of contract renewal contractor will furnish OSP with an updated dealer list and published price list.

  • Research Questions The study addresses the following questions.

  • Procedures for LNP Request The Parties shall provide for the requesting of End Office LNP capability on a reciprocal basis through a written request. The Parties acknowledge that Verizon has deployed LNP throughout its network in compliance with FCC 96-286 and other applicable FCC Regulations.

  • Impasse Procedures The Parties shall seek to reach agreement relative to the appointment of a mediator not later than the sixtieth (60) day preceding the budget submission date. The Parties shall seek to reach agreement relative to the appointment of a fact finder not later than the forty-fifth (45) day preceding the budget submission date. The Parties shall consider but not be limited to the service of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the American Arbitration Association for a mediator and fact finder respectively. If the Parties fail to reach an agreement on the choice of a mediator or fact finder, the PELRB shall be petitioned under the provisions of 273-A: 12.

  • Impasse Procedure 1. If negotiations are not successfully concluded by the first day of school, impasse shall exist. At any earlier time either party may declare impasse. The parties may mutually agree to extend impasse deadlines. Upon reaching of impasse, the items causing the impasse shall be referred to a three-member committee.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.