Common use of Re-employment, Promotion, and the Tenure Review Process Clause in Contracts

Re-employment, Promotion, and the Tenure Review Process. The pursuit of knowledge and learning manifests itself in different ways in various disciplines such as the sciences, arts, humanities, and professional fields. Faculty within each of these disciplines are well situated to recommend specific criteria to evaluate work within their discipline. The framework for this evaluation is a combination of the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure and the academic unit’s criteria for implementation of those Standards. The University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure provide the foundation for the academic unit’s criteria. Academic unit criteria, therefore, must be consistent with the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure (see Appendix D); must specify appropriate discipline-related benchmarks; and must articulate how academic units will apply the University Standards. After proposal by the academic unit, consideration by CAP, approval by FRPC, and approval by Oakland, the written academic unit criteria together with the University Standards, and academic unit review procedures described in paragraph 41a.(3) will constitute the Review Statement that forms the basis for all evaluations. Consistent with the provisions set forth herein, the final decision as to whether or not a faculty member will be re-employed, promoted, and/or tenured, will be Oakland's. Oakland will make all decisions at the designated points in the following Tenure Review Process.

Re-employment, Promotion, and the Tenure Review Process. The pursuit of knowledge and learning manifests itself in different ways in various disciplines such as the sciences, arts, humanities, and professional fields. Faculty within each of these disciplines are well situated to recommend specific criteria to evaluate work within their discipline. The framework for this evaluation is a combination of the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure and the academic unit’s criteria for implementation of those Standards. The University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure provide the foundation for the academic unit’s criteria. Academic unit criteria, therefore, must be consistent with the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure (see Appendix D); must specify appropriate discipline-related benchmarks; and must articulate how academic units will apply the University Standards. After proposal by the academic unit, consideration by CAP, approval by FRPC, and approval by Oakland, the written academic unit criteria together with the University Standards, and academic unit review procedures described in paragraph 41a.(341a (3) will constitute the Review Statement that forms the basis for all evaluations. Consistent with the provisions set forth herein, the final decision as to whether or not a faculty member will be re-employed, promoted, and/or tenured, will be Oakland's. Oakland will make all decisions at the designated points in the following Tenure Review Process.

Re-employment, Promotion, and the Tenure Review Process. The pursuit of knowledge and learning manifests itself in different ways in various disciplines such as the sciences, arts, humanities, and professional fields. Faculty within each of these disciplines are well situated to recommend specific criteria to evaluate work within their discipline. The framework for this evaluation is a combination of the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure and the academic unit’s criteria for implementation of those Standards. The University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure provide the foundation for the academic unit’s criteria. Academic unit criteria, therefore, must be consistent with the University Standards for Re-employment, Promotion and Tenure (see Appendix DE); must specify appropriate discipline-related benchmarks; and must articulate how academic units will apply the University Standards. After proposal by the academic unit, consideration by CAP, approval by FRPC, and approval by Oakland, the written academic unit criteria together with the University Standards, and academic unit review procedures described in paragraph 41a.(3) will constitute the Review Statement that forms the basis for all evaluations. Consistent with the provisions set forth herein, the final decision as to whether or not a faculty member will be re-employed, promoted, and/or tenured, will be Oakland's. Oakland will make all decisions at the designated points in the following Tenure Review Process.