Recommended approach Sample Clauses

Recommended approach. It is recommended that thorough assessments of environmental drivers are undertaken periodically, and ideally following the completion of comprehensive assessments such as those described above (thereby accessing verified datasets). These assessments should be resourced and drafted centrally, with adequate time and resources for consultation with national experts, who may undertake further consultation with site managers etc. The draft assessments would ideally be prepared and available online in a system that accommodates interaction and feedback. It is recommended that these assessments draw on information gathered as part of the two centralized assessments described above. However, there are substantial differences between the two threat classification schemes described above (IUCN compared with Article 12). Comparison at the top level (Figure 4.1) shows that many of the Article 12 threats cut across more than one of the IUCN threats, and vice versa. Unfortunately, this means that by choosing any one scheme, it is not possible to automatically translate possible results from the other. Figure 4.1: Comparison of the threat classification schemes adopted by the IUCN and that used in Article 12
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Recommended approach. Considering the service features of Express buses, and the capabilities of existing tools, the recommended approach will utilize multiple methods as illustrated in Figure 3. Essentially this approach incorporates the benefits of mode choice model (to account for the influence of highway network performance) and TBEST (to provide stop level estimates for detailed service planning). At corridor level, the potential demand between identified high-demand OD pairs will be estimated first. Both STOPS and other forms of mode choice models (regional travel demand models or incremental logit models) will be evaluated for the suitability for this task. The demand for the express route will serve as a reference total for TBEST stop level estimation. Service attributes could be developed through multiple alternatives/scenarios as TBEST usually works. Alternatively, integrated modeling approach may be another potential approach that can be explored for future enhancement.
Sample 1

Related to Recommended approach

  • Approach All investments are to be made using the value approach by investing in companies at prices below their underlying long term values to protect capital from loss and earn income over time and provide operating income as needed. With regard to equities, no attempt is made to forecast the economy or the stock market. The manager will attempt to identify financially sound companies with good potential profitability which are selling at large discounts to their intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of low prices may consist of some or all of the following characteristics: low price earnings ratios, high dividend yields, significant discounts to book value, and free cash flow. Downside protection is obtained by seeking a margin of safety in terms of a sound financial position and a low price in relation to intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of financial integrity which are regularly monitored, include debt/equity ratios, financial leverage, asset turnover, profit margin, return on equity, and interest coverage. As a result of this bargain hunting approach, it is anticipated that purchases will be made when economic and issue-specific conditions are less than ideal and sentiment is uncertain or negative. Conversely, it is expected that gains will be realized when issue-specific factors are positive and sentiment is buoyant. The investment time horizon is one business cycle (approximately 3-5 years). As regards bonds, the approach is similar. No attempt is made to forecast the economy or interest rates. The manager will attempt to purchase attractively priced bonds offering yields better than Treasury bonds with maturities of 10 years or less that are of sound quality i.e. whose obligations are expected to be fully met as they come due. We do not regard rating services as being an unimpeachable source for assessing credit quality any more than we would regard a broker's recommendation on a stock as being necessarily correct. In any form of investment research and evaluation, there is no substitute for the reasoned judgement of the investment committee and its managers.

  • Contractor Approach The Contractor shall develop, document, and implement BIDM Data Exchanges to obtain BIDM Imports from and to send BIDM Exports to CDPHE's CEDRS. 17.47.2.1. This exchange shall occur on a period as determined by the Department

  • Focus The focus of the nursing role is responding to the health needs of individuals, families and communities. The registered nurse is responsible for assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation of consumer care.

  • Coordinators The contractor shall assign coordinators as needed to coordinate At-Sea Monitor deployment and provide At-Sea Monitor support services. The coordinator shall be designated as key personnel under this contract (per section H.

  • Target Population TREATMENT FOR ADULT (TRA) Target Population

  • Strategy As an organization without operational services (fuel, maintenance, etc.), and in consideration that the majority of potential issues come from boat maintenance whereby the boats are personal property, the predominant strategy will be the minimization of on-site waste. With this approach, the organization will have minimal potential impact on the environment and reduce regulatory risk. To accomplish this, requirements will be established by policy, periodic communications shall occur, and audits will be utilized to provide feedback for improvement.

  • Supervisors Supervisors may continue to perform bargaining unit work which is incidental to their jobs. They may also perform bargaining unit work in emergency situations and where such work is necessary to train a covered member. Such work by supervisors may result from but shall not cause any layoffs of covered members.

  • Feedback You have no obligation to provide us with ideas, suggestions, or proposals (“Feedback”). However, if you submit Feedback to us, then you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license that is sub-licensable and trans- ferable, to make, use, sell, have made, offer to sell, import, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, or publicly perform the Feedback in any manner without any obligation, royalty, or restriction based on intellectual property rights or otherwise.

  • Objectives The Parties conclude this Agreement, among others, for purposes of: (a) Encouraging expansion and diversification of trade between the Parties; (b) Eliminating the barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of goods and services between the Parties; (c) Promoting fair competition in the Parties' markets; (d) Creating new employment opportunities; (e) Creating framework for furthering bilateral, regional and multilateral cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of this Agreement; and (f) Providing forum and approach for resolution of disputes amiably.

  • Evaluators The success of a program of evaluation depends upon a high level of skill and training of all participants in the process. The District shall provide annual training on the Colorado State Educator Evaluation System and ongoing training on inter-rater reliability using approved materials from the Colorado Department of Education. As required by Colorado law, all performance evaluations must be conducted by an individual who has completed a training in evaluation skills that has been approved by the Department of Education.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!