Service Planning. Further details of each of these non-GP data sources are provided in the attached Annex D.4 Sharing Dataset Definitions. Availability of these categories of data through Surrey Care Record / TVS systems is to be phased in during the period of this sharing specification and not all of the data categories identified above are expected to be available through Surrey Care Record or Thames Valley & Surrey care record or analytics immediately but will be available for future reporting requirements. By design, the shared data excludes particularly sensitive records. The clinical terms and Read Codes that are used to identify these sensitive data records are presented in the attached Annex D.5 Excluded Read Codes. The project has been carefully designed to place the interests of patients uppermost. Concepts of informed consent and compliance with the Caldicott and Data Protection Principles have been incorporated into the software design. The design, data protection and security risks, and the associated security measures and safeguards have been subjected to a detailed and rigorous impact assessment by representatives from each of the participating partner organisation via the DPIA approvals process done through the Surrey Heartland Data Governance Group and TVS Federated Controller Group. The Surrey Heartlands Chief Clinical Information Officer has confirmed that they are satisfied that all appropriate technical and physical measures against unauthorised or unlawful access, accidental loss or destruction of care data are in place. Frimley Chief Clinical Information Officer has undertaken the same assurance review in their role as Lead Data Controller for TVS systems and has confirmed that they are satisfied that all appropriate technical and physical measures against unauthorised or unlawful access, accidental loss or destruction of care data are in place. A Surrey Heartland Data Governance Group and a Privacy Officer function for the Surrey Care Record has been established to ensure that the identified risks are mitigated to the level that is considered to be acceptable level without disproportionate effort. For TVS the TVS Federated Controller Group and Privacy Officer function has been set up to apply the same controls for TVS level processing of data. The Confidentiality & Data Protection policy of the Surrey Care Record and equivalent polices for TVS Shared Care Record explains how the rights of data subjects will be met and confirms audit arrangements for ...
Service Planning. Local Health Districts and Specialty Health Networks have a responsibility to effectively plan their services over the short and long term to enable service delivery that is responsive to the health needs of their defined populations. It is noted that for a number of clinical services, the catchment population extends beyond the geographic borders of the Local Health District. Generally, Local Health Districts and Specialty Health Networks are responsible for ensuring that relevant Government health policy goals are achieved through the planning and funding of the range of health services which best meet the needs of their communities (whether those services are provided locally, by other Local Health Districts, Specialty Health Networks and/or other providers). Under the Health Services Xxx 0000, Boards have the function of ensuring that strategic plans to guide the delivery of services are developed for the District or Network and for approving these plans. Local Health Districts and Specialty Health Networks oversighted by their Boards have responsibility for developing the following Plans: Strategic Plan Clinical Services Plans Workforce Plan Corporate Governance Plan Asset Strategic Plan Operations/Business plans at all management levels of a Local Health District or Specialty Health Network. A number of these plans inform related documentation including Business Cases for capital works. Requirements for capital projects less than $10 million, and those greater than $10 million, are set out in the NSW Health Process of Facility Planning. Consistent with the Stakeholder Engagement principles set out in the NSW Health Corporate Governance and Accountability Compendium, effective and meaningful stakeholder engagement is fundamental to achieving the LHD’s objectives in the planning, development and delivery of improved services and outcomes. The Services set out below and those services listed in Schedule D, including the volume or level of each service, shall not be varied without the agreement of the Ministry.
Service Planning. Further details of each of these non-GP data sources are provided in the attached Annex D.4 Sharing Dataset Definitions. Availability of these categories of data through Surrey Care Record is to be phased in during the period of this sharing specification and not all of the data categories identified above are expected to be available through Connected Care immediately. By design, the shared data excludes particularly sensitive records. The clinical terms and Read Codes that are used to identify these sensitive data records are presented in the attached Annex D.5 Excluded Read Codes. The project has been carefully designed to place the interests of patients uppermost. Concepts of informed consent and compliance with the Caldicott and Data Protection Principles have been incorporated into the software design. The design and data protection and security risks and the associated security measures and safeguards have been subjected to a detailed and rigorous impact assessment by representatives from each of the participating partner organisation. The Surrey Heartlands Chief Clinical Information Officer has confirmed that they are satisfied that all appropriate technical and physical measures against unauthorised or unlawful access, accidental loss or destruction of care data are in place. A Surrey Heartland Data Governance Group and a Privacy Officer function for the Surrey Care Record has been established to ensure that the identified risks are mitigated to the level that is considered to be acceptable level without disproportionate effort. The Confidentiality & Data Protection policy of the Surrey Care Record explains how the rights of data subjects will be met and confirms audit arrangements for the system.
Service Planning. Contractor shall designate an administrative employee whose position description includes shared responsibility with the QMHP for scheduling, facilitating, coordinating, overseeing and documenting the monthly IDT meetings and quarterly Service Planning meetings. The IDT meetings shall:
a. Include the following persons: Individual and/ or their legal representative, Administrator or designee, RN, Social Services Coordinator, Activities Coordinator, QMHP and LMP. ODHS Designee, Contract Administrator and health care providers shall be invited to participate in the IDT as needed.
b. Be scheduled at a time that is convenient for team members to attend. CMHP and facility service planning functions are expected to be integrated into these monthly IDT meetings.
c. Define timeframes and protocols for assessments and comprehensive Service Plan and Behavior Plan development as specified in the Memorandum of Understanding between Contractor and CMHP.
d. Review Individual-specific medical or behavioral status, critical incidents, Behavior Plans, including interventions in any related plans carried out by Contractors staff and CMHP employees, and other clinical and Residential Care Facility operational issues, including any necessary staffing changes required to promote resident safety and stability, at least monthly or more frequently if the Individual’s health or behavior deteriorates. Updates to the Service Plan and all attached component plans must be done quarterly.
e. Ensure the Service Plan, in addition to licensure requirements:
(1) Describes the reasons the Individual continues to require Services under this Contract;
(2) Describes the Individual’s progress towards meeting discharge goals, their potential to transition to a less intensive program and strategies to address barriers to these goals.
f. Review each Individual’s response to scheduled and unscheduled medications prescribed for management of psychiatric or behavioral symptoms with the LMP.
g. Document participation and attendance in the monthly IDT and quarterly Service Plan meetings. Virtual participation is acceptable but must be documented. Team members who are unable to attend the meeting must receive copies of the updated Service Plans.
h. Implement policies and procedures for communicating and documenting Behavior Plan and Service Plan changes to Contractor’s direct care staff in a timely manner. Review of the Service Plan by Contractor’s staff must be documented.
i. Designate a member of the S...
Service Planning. 1. The Provider shall use uniform intake and assessment tools and procedures and shall report data elements according to reporting schedules and processes established by the Department. The Provider also shall use and abide by all policies, procedures, and protocols developed by the Department, including, without limitation, procedures and protocols for tracking and reporting (i) grievances and rights violations, and (ii) critical incidents. The Provider shall electronically transmit identified uniform data elements in accordance with specifications established by the Department.
2. The Provider shall abide by and implement Individualized Support Plan (ISP) policies, procedures, practices, and/or protocols established by the Department for carrying out the Provider’s functions pursuant to Xxxxx v. DHHS (AMHI Consent Decree), including, without limitation, (i) requirements for supporting Community Integration Service staff in their role of coordinating and monitoring progress on ISPs, and (ii) procedures for completing initial and subsequent 90-day reviews in a timely manner.
Service Planning. 2.5.11.1. The Contractor shall have a service planning system, which utilizes the information gathered in the Member’s intake and assessment to build a comprehensive service plan. The service plan may also be known as a treatment plan or a Member care plan, and shall include:
2.5.11.1.1. Measurable goals related to the chief complaint.
2.5.11.1.2. Strategies to achieve the stated goals and a mechanism for monitoring and revising the service plan as appropriate.
2.5.11.2. The Contractor shall create an individualized, culturally sensitive service plan, developed by the Member and/or the designated Member representative and the Member’s provider or treatment team for each Member seeking services. The service plan shall utilize the Member’s strengths, and shall be signed by the Member as well as the reviewing professional.
2.5.11.2.1. If a Member chooses not to sign his/her service plan, documentation shall be provided in the Member’s medical record stating the Member’s reason for not signing the plan.
2.5.11.3. Service planning shall take place annually or if there is a change in the Member’s level of functioning and care needs.
2.5.11.4. Service plans shall be appropriate to the treatment setting especially for integrated settings.
2.5.11.5. The Contractor shall coordinate with County departments of human/social services in regards to children and youth in out-of-home placements, including kinship care, xxxxxx care and subsidized adoptions.
2.5.11.5.1. The Contractor shall collaborate with the Colorado Department of Human services and their local counties to ensure that children who have had a positive screen for trauma receive a formal follow-up trauma assessment and trauma informed covered services (if indicated) provided by the Contractor.
2.5.11.5.2. The Contractor shall coordinate behavioral health referrals and services with county case workers, and initiate/maintain contact with case workers on an ongoing basis regarding child/adolescent Members as well as adult Members involved in child welfare that have children in their care. The Contractor shall ensure that therapists and case managers coordinate with county case workers regarding significant events which include, but are not limited to, discharge from treatment, significant clinical decompensation, and no shows.
2.5.11.5.3. The Contractor shall identify a person within its organization who can serve as a main point of contact for the county departments of human/social services. The name and cont...
Service Planning. The above categories of data include both coded data as well as free text. It is necessary and proportional to share the above spectrum of confidential data into a shared data repository on the grounds that:
1. The specific requirements of each instance of data use cannot reasonably be predicted in advance for some instances
2. And for others that the alternative of viewing data that is extracted in real-time from source systems is not technically feasible given the current capabilities offered by the data controllers’ source systems
3. The copying of identifiable confidential data into a shared data repository for the purposes above can be regarded as in the best interests of the data subjects. This policy has been tested with Queen’s Counsel and it is Counsel’s opinion that the policy and approach are necessary and proportional given the technical barriers, extended delays and costs associated with a just in time or real time sharing.
Service Planning. Further details of each of these non-GP data sources are provided in the attached Annex D.4 Sharing Dataset Definitions. Availability of these categories of data through Connected Care is to be phased in during the period of this sharing specification and not all of the data categories identified above are expected to be available through Connected Care immediately. By design, the shared data excludes particularly sensitive records. The clinical terms and Read Codes that are used to identify these sensitive data records are presented in the attached Annex D.5 Excluded Read Codes. The project has been carefully designed to place the interests of patients uppermost. Concepts of informed consent and compliance with the Caldicott and Data Protection Principles have been incorporated into the software design. The design and data protection and security risks and the associated security measures and safeguards have previously been subjected to a detailed and rigorous impact assessment by representatives from each of the participating partner organisations acting together as the IG Steering Group that oversees Connected Care . The IG Steering Group is satisfied that all appropriate technical and physical measures against unauthorised or unlawful access, accidental loss or destruction of care data are in place. Furthermore, it is the view of the Berkshire Local Medical Committee “that the Graphnet solution and proposed change for creating a Central Data Repository has been subjected to a rigorous Information Governance and technical security assessment. It is therefore the LMC’s recommendation that the Graphnet solution and proposed Central Data Repository is fit for purpose, appropriate and justifiable”. As the uses of the identifiable data covered by this sharing requirement are restricted to the provision of care, no explicit and direct consultation has been carried with the public in respect of this sharing requirement. However, patient groups were established in east and west Berkshire for the specific purpose of commenting on the sharing planned and on the information governance put in place to protect the confidentiality of the data. These groups include CCG and Healthwatch patient representatives with other self-selecting volunteers to form groups that have current awareness with health and social care issues.
Service Planning. The above categories of data include both coded data as well as free text.
Service Planning. The Provider shall use uniform intake and assessment tools and procedures and shall report data elements according to reporting schedules and processes established by the Department. The Provider also shall use and abide by all policies, procedures, and protocols developed by the Department, including, without limitation, procedures and protocols for tracking and reporting (i) grievances and rights violations, and (ii) critical incidents. The Provider shall electronically transmit identified uniform data elements in accordance with specifications established by the Department. The Provider agrees to cooperate with DHHS and/or its Authorized Agent in Prior Authorization and Utilization Reviews established by DHHS and/or its Authorized Agent. The Provider shall abide by and implement Individualized Support Plan (ISP) policies, procedures, practices, and/or protocols established by the Department for carrying out the Provider’s functions pursuant to Xxxxx v. DHHS (AMHI Consent Decree), including, without limitation, (i) requirements for supporting Behavioral Health Home and Community Integration Service staff in their role of coordinating and monitoring progress on ISPs, and (ii) procedures for completing initial and subsequent 90-day reviews in a timely manner.