Record Linkage - Entity Resolution Sample Clauses

Record Linkage - Entity Resolution. Record linkage (RL) is the process of locating records in a dataset referring to the same entity across different data sources. RL is necessary when joining datasets based on entities that may or may not share a common identifier (Christen; Herzog, Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx). In data warehousing, RL is fundamental: each source system may have a different way of representing same entities. Usually, RL occurs in the second phase of the ETL process. Entity resolution (Xxxxxxxx) is a process executed by a middleware, where non-obvious relationships across different data silos can be exposed, allowing the connection of such sources. Entity resolution engines apply rules, based on deterministic or probabilistic rules, to identify hidden relationships across the data. The simplest kind of record linkage, called deterministic or rules-based record linkage, generates links based on the number of individual identifiers matching among the available datasets (Xxxx and Xxxxx). When all of some identifiers (above a threshold) are identical, two records are considered matching. This approach is ideal when entities share common identifiers, and when quality of data is relatively high. More complex deterministic rules have been devised to infer more complicated connections (Xxxxxxxx; Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Herzog, Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx). When data quality decreases or data complexity increases, the number of deterministic rules needed rapidly grows, making the usage of specialized software tools (see Section 3) fundamental. Moreover, when new data, with characteristics different than expected when devising the rules, enter the system there could be the need of a complete restructure of the deterministic rules. Probabilistic record linkage (Xxxxxxx), or fuzzy matching, probabilistic merging, has a different approach: considering a large range of identifiers, estimating the ability to identify a match or non-match for each identifier, building a weighted set, and using these weights to estimate the probability that two records refers to the same entity. This approach usually require a training phase, that can use a set of gold examples manually entered in the system (and in modern systems, this phase can be carried out via crowdsourcing).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Record Linkage - Entity Resolution

  • UDP DNS resolution RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of two packets, the UDP DNS query and the corresponding UDP DNS response. If the RTT is 5 times greater than the time specified in the relevant SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

  • TCP DNS resolution RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of packets from the start of the TCP connection to its end, including the reception of the DNS response for only one DNS query. If the RTT is 5 times greater than the time specified in the relevant SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

  • DNS resolution RTT Refers to either “UDP DNS resolution RTT” or “TCP DNS resolution RTT”.

  • DNSSEC proper resolution There is a valid DNSSEC chain of trust from the root trust anchor to a particular domain name, e.g., a TLD, a domain name registered under a TLD, etc.

  • Problem Resolution The parties will endeavour to resolve any problems identified with the operation of this Agreement as they arise.

  • Meaning of Extraordinary Resolution (1) The expression “

  • Formal Resolution 1. Service Provider or TJJD staff who wish to submit problems for resolution may do so in writing, including all relevant information and a recommended resolution (Statement of Problem).

  • Resolution If the Employer provides the requested remedy or a mutually agreed-upon alternative, the grievance will be considered resolved and may not be moved to the next step.

  • Informal Resolution To expedite resolution and control the cost of any dispute, controversy or claim related to this Agreement ("Dispute"), you and Company agree to first attempt to negotiate any Dispute (except those Disputes expressly provided below) informally for at least thirty (30) days before initiating any arbitration or court proceeding. Such informal negotiations commence upon written notice from one person to the other.

  • Error Resolution If you believe that you did not authorize an electronic fund transaction, if you need a copy of a transaction receipt from a Merchant, if you think your statement or receipt is wrong, or if you need more information about a transaction listed on the statement or receipt, you should call or write us at the phone number or address shown at the end of these Regulatory Disclosures under “UMB Contact Information” You should report errors no later than sixty (60) days after information is available to you on your periodic statement or in your electronic statement information concerning the transaction that you believe to be in error or which you believe is a problem. Include the following information: (a) your name and your HSA Deposit Account number; (b) describe the error or the transaction you are unsure about and explain as clearly as you can why you believe it is an error or why you need more information; and (c) the dollar amount of the suspected error. If you tell us orally, we may require that you send us your complaint or questions in writing within ten (10) business days. We will determine whether an error occurred within ten (10) business days after we hear from you and will correct any error promptly. If we need more time, however, we may take up to 45 days to investigate your complaint or question. If we decide to do this, we will credit your account within ten (10) business days for the amount you think is in error so that you will have the use of the money during the time it takes us to complete our investigation. If we ask you to put your complaint or question in writing and we do not receive it within ten (10) business days, we may not credit your account. For errors involving new accounts, point-of-sale, or foreign-initiated transactions, we may take up to 90 days to investigate your complaint or question. For new accounts, we may take up to 20 business days to credit your account for the amount you think is in error. We will tell you the results within three (3) business days after completing our investigation. If we decide that there was no error, we will send you a written explanation. You may ask for copies of the documents that we used in our investigation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.