Common use of Remediation Plan Clause in Contracts

Remediation Plan. 15.8.1 A remediation plan is required when there are identified performance concerns that result in a rating of “Ineffective” or “Partially Ineffective”. The educator whose performance evaluation includes a remediation plan shall be given an opportunity to improve their effectiveness through the implementation of the plan. If the next performance evaluation shows that the person is performing effectively, no further action shall be taken concerning the original performance evaluation. If the evaluation shows the person is still not performing effectively, they shall receive written notice that their performance evaluation shows a rating of ineffective, and a copy of the documentation relied upon in measuring the person’s performance and identification of deficiencies. 15.8.2 The performance evaluation system shall also ensure that the standards and criteria identified in the rubrics are available to all educators in writing through the on-line system and are communicated and discussed by the educator being evaluated and the evaluator prior to and during the course of the evaluation. 15.8.3 The electronic sign-off on the report of any educator shall not be construed to indicate agreement with the information contained in the evaluation report. If the educator being evaluated disagrees with any of the conclusions or recommendations made in the evaluation report, the educator may attach any written explanation or other relevant documentation that the educator deems necessary. 15.8.4 The final evaluation report shall be reviewed by a supervisor of the evaluator, whose review shall be documented and reflected in the on-line system and evaluation document. 15.8.5 The non-probationary educator who objects to a second consecutive Performance Evaluation rating of “Ineffective” or “Partially Ineffective” has an opportunity to appeal that rating. See APEX Guide – Appeal Process for Non-Probationary Educators.

Remediation Plan. 15.8.1 14.9.1 A remediation plan is required when there are identified performance concerns that result in a rating of “Ineffective” or “Partially Ineffective”. The educator teacher whose performance evaluation includes a remediation plan shall be given an opportunity to improve their his or her effectiveness through the implementation of the plan. If the next performance evaluation shows that the person is performing effectively, no further action shall be taken concerning the original performance evaluation. If the evaluation shows the person is still not performing effectively, they he or she shall receive written notice that their his or her performance evaluation shows a rating of ineffective, and a copy of the documentation relied upon in measuring the person’s performance and identification of deficiencies. 15.8.2 14.9.2 The performance evaluation system shall also ensure that the standards and criteria identified in the rubrics are available to all educators teachers in writing through the on-line system and are communicated and discussed by the educator teacher being evaluated and the evaluator prior to and during the course of the evaluation. 15.8.3 14.9.3 The electronic sign-off on the report of any educator teacher shall not be construed to indicate agreement with the information contained in the evaluation report. If the educator teacher being evaluated disagrees with any of the conclusions or recommendations made in the evaluation report, the educator teacher may attach any written explanation or other relevant documentation that the educator teacher deems necessary. 15.8.4 14.9.4 The final evaluation report shall be reviewed by a supervisor of the evaluator, whose review shall be documented and reflected in the on-line system and evaluation document. 15.8.5 14.9.5 The non-probationary educator teacher who objects to a second consecutive Performance Evaluation rating of “Ineffective” or “Partially Ineffective” has an opportunity to appeal that rating. See APEX Guide – Appeal Process for Non-Probationary EducatorsTeachers.