RUN SELECTION PROCEDURE Sample Clauses

RUN SELECTION PROCEDURE. A. Bus drivers and bus aides will bid concurrently in order of their seniority.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RUN SELECTION PROCEDURE. A. Drivers and bus aides will bid concurrently in order of their seniority. In order to effectuate this, the two seniority lists for drivers and bus aides will be considered to be “merged” to determine the order of bidding.
RUN SELECTION PROCEDURE. A. Bus drivers and bus aides will bid concurrently in order of their seniority. B. Bus drivers and bus aides will select runs in order of their seniority, with the most senior employee selecting first. Each employee will be allotted five (5) minutes for selection. C. Each bus driver or bus aide may select from any run by order of seniority. D. Runs will be put on display in the transportation office, in a room available for viewing proposed routes. Selection will be done in a separate room. E. One (1) administrator or representative selected by the administration and one (1) union representative selected by the union shall be present as observers during the entire bidding process in the room available for viewing proposed routes. One (1) administrator or representative selected by the administration and one (1) union representative selected by the union shall be present as observers during the entire bidding process in the run selection room.

Related to RUN SELECTION PROCEDURE

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Notification Procedure (i) Each such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered:

  • Application Procedure 7.4.1. Application Priority........................................ 7.4.2. [Reserved].................................................. 7.4.3. Advance Payments............................................

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • Submission Procedure a. If an appeal from suspension or reduction is not settled at Step 2, it may be presented to the Chief of Employee Relations within seven (7) calendar days from the date the decision was rendered.

  • Verification Procedure (1) The signature file of each processed file is validated.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!