Scoring Strategy Sample Clauses

Scoring Strategy. Each scored item will be awarded points by each evaluator, or by the team in total. Points will be assigned based on the evaluator’s interpretation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the Vendor’s response to each requirement. In order to receive the most points possible Vendors are encouraged to provide as much clarifying detail as possible in the “Comments” column of Section 5, “Vendor Technical Proposal” without being overly verbose. The following items define the scoring strategy: Highest Points Response indicates excellent capability and support of the requirements identified in the RFP. Response stands above all others. There are no critical shortfalls (10 points). Fewer Points Response is above expectations. May have shortfalls in a few non-critical areas (8 points). Fewer Points Response is at expectation and for most areas meets desired quality. May exhibit some shortfalls in a few non-critical areas (6 points).

Scoring Strategy. For items rated with the 7-point response scale, numbers from 1 to 7 are assigned to the scale from A to G, respectively (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; E=5; F=6; and G=7). Thus, the patient’s responses in the 7-point scale are converted into scores from 1 to 7. For the 3 items for subscale Use, numbers from 1 to 5 are assigned to the 5 alternatives. Specifically, the number 1 is assigned to the alternative which represents the smallest amount of use while the number 5 assigned to the alternative which represents the largest amount of use (see Table 3).