Scoring definition

Scoring means sensory evaluation by a panel, using a numerical scale. A nomenclature of defects must be used. ‘Grading’ means a quality classification which is performed on the basis of scoring.

Scoring means assessment of creditworthiness of the User by the Provider for the purpose of obtaining a loan from the Provider or for the purpose of an increase of an already received loan. All that in compliance with Art. 4 of these Business Terms and Conditions.

Scoring. All scoring factors ideally will be quantified in a LCC (Life-cycle cost) analysis, combining the impact for each individual value chain partners, as well as taking a full value chain view (the impact on the full life-cycle of the material). A first indication of the relevance of this factor for the company and/or the aligned value chain can be obtained through the following scoring.

Examples of Scoring in a sentence

• Total number of housed dogs Number of dogs to assess Up to 29 All dogs 30-59 30 60-89 40 90-139 50 140 over 60 597 598 S U AN CRIP T 599 Table 4: Scoring system of quantitative and qualitative variables.

• The Contractor shall remediate any deficiencies found by the third-party security assessor based upon a mutually-agreeable risk scoring standard, such as the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (“CVSS”), to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely manner for known vulnerabilities.

• The agreement shall also include the obligation of the host broadcaster to comply with the requirements set forth in the Scoring and Data Requirements (Exhibit 4), in particular the use of standard graphical lay-outs for scoring and data information and inserts.

• Pre- Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) Yes kindergarten Instructional Support Domain scored by an external Instructional vendor as designated by the publisher and detailed in Support the PK-8 PMF Policy & Technical Guide for that given year.

• Scoring includes data from the Mapping Tool and other key informafion about the proposed installafion.

More Definitions of Scoring

Scoring. Each of these categories is scored on a weighted scale. The weighting of each category and criteria for scoring is detailed in TTM Documentation.

Scoring. Ratio of average distance to customer compared to the old model. The distance to customers can be assessed quantitatively if the expected average distance is known. Otherwise, the distance can be assessed qualitatively using the quantitative scores as a guideline. We look at the percentage change of the average distance towards customers in the decentralized model compared to the current business model. The expectation is that the average distance will decrease, therefore the scale is scaled towards the negative side. Score Percentage decrease of distance 1 >10 % 2 0% ‐ 10% 3 ‐20% ‐ 0% 4 ‐20% ‐ ‐30% 5 <‐30% Figure 19. Scoring on distance towards customer 15 An example is given on xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/decentralized-manufacture-the-drivers-and-barriers. Also the case from INSPIRE D1.2, where reworking product X would be necessary, is an example where distributed production can help overcome the shelf life problem.

Scoring. Score Does your company has in place a network of long‐lasting and trusted collaborations? 1 Not at all ( … ) 3 Quite possible to increase the number of collaborations 5 Extremely easy to enlarge the network and add specific actors based on needs Figure 11. Scoring on existence of networks and collaboration

Scoring. Score How difficult is it for the company to clearly define the market demand for the pool of customized product that is going to realize? 1 Very difficult (almost impossible to clearly identify a market demand) 2 Quite difficult (demand is difficult to be investigated due to different reasons)

Scoring. The Marketing Agreement would contain credit scoring criteria for POMS new customers, with a floor of FICO 600 or the equivalent. POMS would obtain Protection One's prior written approval before marketing to the sub 600 marketplace.

Scoring. The assessment of the plant / product quality should be done by expert judgement. For this a qualitative scale can be used from 1 (low quality) to 5 (high quality). The quality should be assessed absolute for the decentralized model. It can be possible that a lower or different quality as in the centralized model is accepted for other benefits, e.g. because the local consumption has different requirements or because local feedstock has different qualities Score 1 Low quality

Scoring. The cost per unit of product (e.g. per kg) can be assessed quantitatively if the expected cost (in a decentralized business model) and the cost in the reference situation are known. Otherwise, the cost can be assessed qualitatively using the quantitative scores as a guideline. We look at the percentage change of the cost of the product in the decentralized model compared to the current business model. The cost per unit may increase in some cases; in other cases, it will decrease. Therefore, the scale is both towards the positive and towards the negative. Score Percentage increase of unit costs 1 >30 % 2 20% ‐ 30% 3 0% ‐ 20% 4 ‐10% ‐ 0% 5 <‐10% Figure 18. Scoring on cost per unit of product