Section 280G Limitation. In the event that any payments to which Executive becomes entitled in accordance with the provisions hereof, or in connection with any plans or programs referred to in Exhibit A or Section 2.2 hereof, would otherwise be deemed to constitute “parachute payments” (each one, a “Parachute Payment”) within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and the regulations and administrative guidance thereunder (the “Code”), then such payments will be subject to reduction to the extent necessary to assure that Executive receives only the greater benefit of receiving (a) the amount of those payments which would constitute such a Parachute Payment or (b) the amount which yields Executive the greatest after-tax amount of benefits after taking into account any excise tax imposed on the payments provided to Executive pursuant to this Agreement (or on any other benefits to which Executive may be entitled in connection with the Change in Control or the subsequent termination of service) under Section 4999 of the Code.
Section 280G Limitation. If any payment(s) or benefit(s) the Executive would receive pursuant to this Agreement and/or pursuant to any other agreement or arrangement would (a) constitute a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, and (b) but for this Section 17, be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), then such payment(s) or benefit(s) (collectively, “Payments”) shall be reduced to the Reduced Amount. The “Reduced Amount” shall be the largest portion of the Payments that can be paid or provided without causing any portion of the Payments being subject to the Excise Tax. If a reduction in payments or benefits constituting “parachute payments” is necessary so that the Payments equal the Reduced Amount, reduction shall occur in the following order: (i) first, the Severance Payment under this Agreement, (ii) second, any other cash payments due under any other agreement between the Employer and the Executive; (iii) third, cancellation of the acceleration of vesting of any stock options, and (iv) lastly, other non-cash forms of benefits. Calculations of the foregoing will be performed at the expense of the Employer by an accounting firm selected by the Employer. The determinations of such accounting firm shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the Employer and the Executive.
Section 280G Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, in no event shall the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement constitute an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code. In order to avoid such a result, such aggregate payments or benefits will be reduced, if necessary, to a lesser amount, the value of which is one dollar ($1.00) less than an amount equal to three (3) times Executive’s “base amount” as determined in accordance with said Section 280G. The reduction shall be allocated among the components of such payments and benefits in the manner designated by Executive. The foregoing limitations are not intended in any way to limit the payments or benefits that Executive may be or become entitled to under the terms of the BFC Agreement.
Section 280G Limitation. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, in the event that any payment or benefit received or to be received by Executive (all such payments and benefits being hereinafter referred to as the “Total Payments”) would not be deductible (in whole or part) by the Company Group or any affiliates making such payment or providing such benefit as a result of Section 280G of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) then, to the extent necessary to make such portion of the Total Payments deductible (and after taking into account any reduction in the Total Payments required by any similar reduction or elimination provision contained in such other plan, arrangement or agreement), the portion of the Total Payments that does not constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code shall first be reduced (if necessary, to zero), and all other Total Payments shall thereafter be reduced (if necessary, to zero) with, in each case, cash payments being reduced before non-cash payments (and, within each category, payments to be paid last being reduced first); provided, however, that such reduction shall only be made if the amount of such Total Payments, as so reduced (and after subtracting the net amount of federal, state and local income taxes on such reduced Total Payments) is greater than or equal to the amount of such Total Payments without such reduction (but after subtracting the net amount of federal, state and local income taxes on such Total Payments and the amount of the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code on such unreduced Total Payments). Any determination required to be made under this Section shall be made by independent tax counsel reasonably acceptable to both Executive and the Company, and shall be paid for by the Company (“Tax Counsel”). It is possible that, after the determinations and selections made pursuant to the foregoing paragraph, Executive will receive payments and/or benefits that are, in the aggregate, either more or less than the amount determined under such paragraph (hereafter referred to as an “Excess Payment” or “Underpayment”, as applicable). If Tax Counsel determines that an Excess Payment has been made, then Executive shall promptly repay the Excess Payment to the Company, together with interest on the Excess Payment at the applicable federal rate (as defined in section 1274(d) of the Code) from the date of Executive’s receipt of such Excess Payment until the d...
Section 280G Limitation. If the value of any payment or other benefit the Executive would receive from the Company or otherwise in connection with a Change in Control (the “Benefit”) would (i) constitute a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Code Section 280G, and (ii) but for this sentence, be subject to the excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999 (the “Excise Tax”), then such Benefit shall be reduced to the Reduced Amount. The “Reduced Amount” shall be either:
(i) the largest portion of the Benefit that would result in no portion of the Benefit being subject to the Excise Tax; or
(ii) the largest portion, up to and including the total, of the Benefit, whichever amount, after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes, and the Excise Tax (all computed at the highest applicable marginal rate), results in the Executive’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greater amount of the Benefit notwithstanding that all or some portion of the Benefit may be subject to the Excise Tax. If a reduction in payments or benefits constituting “parachute payments” is necessary so that the Benefit equals the Reduced Amount, reduction shall occur in the following order unless the Executive elects in writing a different order (provided, however, that such election shall be subject to the Company’s approval if made on or after the date on which the event that triggers the Benefit occurs) or required pursuant to Code Section 409A: reduction of cash payments; cancellation of accelerated vesting of stock awards; and reduction of employee benefits. In the event that acceleration of vesting of stock award compensation is to be reduced, such acceleration of vesting shall be cancelled in the reverse order of the date of grant of the Executive’s stock awards unless the Executive elects in writing a different order for cancellation. The accounting firm engaged by the Company for general audit purposes as of the day prior to the effective date of the Change in Control shall perform the foregoing calculations. If the accounting firm so engaged by the Company is serving as accountant or auditor for the individual, entity or group effecting the Change in Control, the Company shall appoint a nationally recognized accounting firm to make the determinations required hereunder. The Company shall bear all expenses with respect to the determinations by such accounting firm required to be made hereunder. The accounting firm engaged to make the determinations hereunder...
Section 280G Limitation. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that the amount of the Severance Payments, and any additional compensation, payment or distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of you, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise, calculated in a manner consistent with Section 280G of the Code and the applicable regulations thereunder (the “Total Severance Payments”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the following provisions shall apply:
i. If the Total Severance Payments, reduced by the sum of (1) the Excise Tax and (2) the total of the Federal, state, and local income and employment taxes payable by you on the amount of the Total Severance Payments which are in excess of the Threshold Amount, are greater than or equal to the Threshold Amount, you shall be entitled to the full benefits payable under this Agreement.
ii. If the Threshold Amount is less than (x) the Total Severance Payments, but greater than (y) the Total Severance Payments reduced by the sum of (1) the Excise Tax and (2) the total of the Federal, state, and local income and employment taxes on the amount of the Total Severance Payments which are in excess of the Threshold Amount, then the Total Severance Payments shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent necessary so that the sum of all Total Severance Payments shall not exceed the Threshold Amount. In such event, the Total Severance Payments shall be reduced in the following order: (1) cash payments not subject to Section 409A of the Code; (2) cash payments subject to Section 409A of the Code; (3) equity-based payments and acceleration; and (4) non-cash forms of benefits. To the extent any payment is to be made over time (e.g., in installments, etc.), then the payments shall be reduced in reverse chronological order.
Section 280G Limitation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the case of a termination of employment subject to the excise tax under Code Section 280G, or any successor provision thereto, the maximum amount payable pursuant to this Section 5(c) shall be the maximum amount payable to Executive without triggering an excise tax under Code Section 280G, or any successor provision thereto. Any amount eliminated or reduced by application of this subsection to avoid the payment of an excise tax under Code Section 280G shall be made to payments that do not constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 409A.
Section 280G Limitation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the maximum amount payable pursuant to this Section 5(c) shall be the maximum amount payable to Executive without triggering an excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any successor provision thereto.
Section 280G Limitation. If any severance or salary continuation payments are to be made under the terms of paragraph 10 herein (together with any other payments which the Executive has the right to receive from the Bank as a result of the termination of Executive without cause by the Bank or the termination by Executive for Good Reason), and those payments shall be determined by the Bank’s or its successor’s, as the case may be, independent certified public accountants to constitute a “golden-parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Code”) and the regulations there under and any successor or similar code section and regulations there under; then the Executive agrees that such aggregate amount shall be reduced in order to avoid the excise tax imposed by section 4999 of the Code. All such amounts hereunder shall be determined by the Bank’s or its successor’s as the case may be, independent certified public accountants, whose determination shall be final and binding upon the parties and their successors to this Agreement.
Section 280G Limitation. If any payment or benefit Executive would receive pursuant to Section 7 and/or Section 9(a), but determined without regard to any additional payment required under this Section 9(b), (collectively, the “Payment”) would (i) constitute a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and (ii) be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code or any interest or penalties payable with respect to such excise tax (such excise tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Excise Tax”), then Executive’s benefits under this Agreement shall be either: (1) delivered in full, or (2) delivered as to such lesser extent which would result in no portion of such benefits being subject to the Excise Tax, whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account the applicable federal, state and local income taxes and the Excise Tax, results in the receipt by Employee on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of benefits, notwithstanding that all or some portion of such benefits may be taxable under Section 4999 of the Code.
