Common use of Self-Identification Clause in Contracts

Self-Identification. Employees who believe they have a substance abuse problem are encouraged to self-identify or voluntarily refer themselves to the Employee Assistance Program (E.A.P.), or seek other treatment options. To this end, employees who voluntarily request assistance or self-identify, before discipline is pending or imposed pursuant to this Agreement, will not be subject to discipline because of the self-identification. However, an employee may not avoid disciplinary consequences by taking such action after receiving notice of a directive for reasonable suspicion testing. In addition, self-identification or referral will not preclude the Board from disciplining an employee for misconduct, which would otherwise constitute grounds for discipline.

Self-Identification. Employees who believe they have a substance abuse problem are encouraged to self-identify or voluntarily refer themselves to the Employee Assistance Program (E.A.P.), ) or seek other treatment options. To this end, employees who voluntarily request assistance or self-identify, before discipline is pending or imposed pursuant to this Agreementagreement, will not be subject to discipline because of the self-identification. However, an employee may not avoid disciplinary consequences by taking such action after receiving notice of a directive for reasonable suspicion testing. In addition, self-identification or referral will not preclude the Board from disciplining an employee for misconduct, which would otherwise constitute grounds for discipline.

Self-Identification. Employees who believe they have a substance abuse problem are encouraged to self-identify or voluntarily refer themselves to the Employee Assistance Program (E.A.P.), ) or seek other treatment options. To this end, employees who voluntarily request assistance or self-identify, before discipline is pending or imposed pursuant to this Agreement, will not be subject to discipline because of the self-identification. However, an employee may not avoid disciplinary consequences by taking such action after receiving notice of a directive for reasonable suspicion testing. In addition, self-identification or referral will not preclude the Board from disciplining an employee for misconduct, which would otherwise constitute grounds for discipline.