Sentencing Factors Sample Clauses

Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following United States 23 Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG”) provisions apply to this case: 24 a. A base offense level of 6, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(a)(2). 25 b. An offense level enhancement of 30 levels (+30), based on a loss 26 amount of more than $550,000,000, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(b)(1)(P). For the 27 purposes of this plea agreement, the parties agree to limit the number of stolen payment 28 cards to 20 million, which represents the approximate number of unique card numbers 1 recovered to date. Pursuant to Application Note 3(F)(i), a $500 loss amount is imputed to 2 each payment card, resulting in a total loss amount, for Guidelines purposes, of $10 3 billion. 4 c. An offense level enhancement of 2 levels (+2), because the offense 5 involved more than 10 victims, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A). 6 d. An offense level enhancement of 2 levels (+2), because the offense 8 receiving and selling stolen property, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(b)(4). 9 e. An offense level enhancement of 2 levels (+2), because a substantial 10 part of the fraudulent scheme was committed from outside the United States and because 11 the offense involved sophisticated means and the defendant intentionally engaged in and 12 caused the conduct constituting sophisticated means, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(b)(10). 13 f. An offense level enhancement of 2 levels (+2), because the offense 14 involved the trafficking in unauthorized access devices and counterfeit access devices 15 and because the offense involved the possession of more than 5 means of identification 16 that were unlawfully obtained, pursuant to USSG § 2B1.1(b)(11). 17 g. An offense level enhancement of 3 levels (+3), because the 18 defendant was a manager (but not an organizer or leader) and the criminal activity 19 involved more than five participants and was extensive, pursuant to USSG § 3B1.1(b). 20 h. An offense level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, as set 21 forth in paragraph 12, below, conditioned upon Defendant’s fulfillment of the 22 requirements stated at USSG § 3E1.1. 23 i. Defendant’s Guidelines range is 25 years, because the statutory 24 authorized sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable Guidelines range, 25 pursuant to USSG § 5G1.1. 26 The parties agree they are free to present arguments regarding the applicability of 27 all other provisions of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Defendant understands, 28 however, that at the time of sentencing, the Court i...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that pursuant to United States x. Xxxxxx, 000 X.X. 000 (2005), the Court must determine an advisory sentencing guideline range pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG”). The Court will then determine a reasonable sentence within the statutory range after considering the advisory sentencing guideline range and the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The parties’ agreement herein to any guideline sentencing factors constitutes proof of those factors sufficient to satisfy the applicable burden of proof.
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following Sentencing 13 Guidelines provisions apply to this case: 14 a. For Count 1, a base offense level of 28 under USSG § 2D1.1(a)(6) 15 (at least 700 KG but less than 1,000 KG of Converted Drug Weight). 16 b. A 2-level increase because Defendant distributed a controlled 17 substance through mass-marketing by means of an interactive computer service under 18 USSG § 2D1.1(b)(7). 19 c. A 3-level decrease for acceptance of responsibility under USSG 20 § 3E1.1 (see paragraph 10 below). 21 The parties agree that they are free to present arguments regarding the 22 applicability of all other provisions of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, such as 23 USSG § 2D1.1(b)(13) and USSG § 3B1.1. 24 Defendant understands that at the time of sentencing, the Court is free to reject 25 these stipulated adjustments, and is further free to apply additional downward or upward 26 adjustments in determining Defendant’s Sentencing Guidelines range.
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following Sentencing 17 Guidelines provisions apply to this case:
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following Sentencing 27 Guidelines provisions apply to this case: 1 a. For the offense of Bank Burglary, as charged in Count 1, a base offense 2 level of 12, pursuant to Section 2B2.1(a)(2); 3 b. For the offense of Interstate Transportation of Stolen Aircraft, as charged in 4 Count 2, a base offense level of 6, pursuant to Section 2B1.1(a)(2); 5 c. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 2 should be 6 increased by 12, because the amount of loss for Count 2 was more than 7 $200,000.00, but less than $400,000.00, pursuant to Section 2B1.1(b)(1)(G) 8 and (H); 9 d. For the offense of Interstate and Foreign Transportation of a Stolen 10 Firearm, as charged in Count 3, a base offense level of 14, pursuant to 11 Section 2K2.1(a)(6)(A); 12 e. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 3 should be 13 increased by 2, because the offense charged in Count 3 involved a stolen 14 firearm, pursuant to Section 2K2.1(a)(6) and (b)(4); 15 f. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 3 should be 16 increased by 4, because the defendant used or possessed the firearm in 17 connection with another felony offense, pursuant to Section 2K2.1(b)(6). 18 g. For the offense of Fugitive in Possession of a Firearm, as charged in Count 19 4, a base offense level of 14, pursuant to Section 2K2.1(a)(6)(A); 20 h. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 4 should be 21 increased by 2, because the offense charged in Count 4 involved a stolen 22 firearm, pursuant to Section 2K2.1(a)(6) and (b)(4); 23 i. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 4 should be 24 increased by 4, because the defendant used or possessed the firearm in 25 connection with another felony offense, pursuant to Section 2K2.1(b)(6). 26 j. For the offense of Interstate Transportation of Stolen Vessel, as charged in 27 Count 6, a base offense level of 6, pursuant to Section 2B1.1(a)(2); 1 k. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 6 should be 2 increased by 14, because the amount of loss for Count 2 was more than 3 $400,000.00, but less than $1,000,000.00, pursuant to Section 4 2B1.1(b)(1)(H) and (I). 5 l. For the offense of Interstate Transportation of Stolen Aircraft, as charged in 6 Count 7, a base offense level of 6, pursuant to Section 2B1.1(a)(2); 7 m. The parties agree that the offense level associated with Count 7 should be 8 increased by 14, because the amount o...
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following Sentencing
Sentencing Factors. The parties agree that the following Sentencing 7 Guidelines provisions apply to this case: 8 a. Defendant’s offense is governed by § 2B1.1 of the Sentencing 9 Guidelines; 10 b. Defendant’s base offense level is 7, pursuant to § 2B1.1(a)(1), 11 because Defendant is pleading guilty to wire fraud, which is 12 referenced to § 2B1.1 and has a statutory maximum of 20 years; 13 c. Defendant’s offense level is increased by 16 levels pursuant to 14 § 2B1.1(b)(1)(I), because the loss exceeded $1,500,000, but did not 15 exceed $3,500,000, after excluding the amount of the smaller of the 16 two loan amounts for Zuput and Expect Success, for each of which 17 Defendant submitted two loan applications, and also the amount of 18 the loan for which he withdrew his application for Vangal; 19 d. Defendant’s offense level is increased by 2 levels, pursuant to 20 § 2B1.1(b)(10), because the offense involved sophisticated means; 21 e. Defendant’s offense level is increased by 1 level, pursuant to 22 § 2S1.1(b)(2)(A), because Defendant is pleading guilty to money 23 laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. 24 f. As a result, Defendant’s total offense level, prior to any adjustment 25 for acceptance of responsibility, is 26. 26 Defendant understands, that at the time of sentencing, the Court is free to reject 27 these stipulated adjustments, and is further free to apply additional downward or upward
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Sentencing Factors

  • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS The Contractor will perform any or all Tasks in the Construction Task Catalog for the Unit Price appearing therein multiplied by the following Adjustment Factors. See the General Terms and Conditions for additional information.

  • SECONDARY FACTORS The extent of control which, by agreement, COUNTY may exercise over the details of the work is slight rather than substantial; (b) CONTRACTOR is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (c) In the locality, the work to be done by CONTRACTOR is usually done by a specialist without supervision, rather than under the direction of an employer; (d) The skill required in the particular occupation is substantial rather than slight; (e) The CONTRACTOR rather than the COUNTY supplies the instrumentalities, tools and work place; The length of time for which CONTRACTOR is engaged is of limited duration rather than indefinite; (g) The method of payment of CONTRACTOR is by the job rather than by the time; (h) The work is part of a special or permissive activity, program, or project, rather than part of the regular business of COUNTY; (i) CONTRACTOR and COUNTY believe they are creating an independent contractor relationship rather than an employee relationship; and The COUNTY conducts public business. It is recognized that it is not necessary that all secondary factors support creation of an independent contractor relationship, but rather that overall there are significant secondary factors which indicate that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor. By their signatures to this Agreement, each of the undersigned certifies that it is his or her considered judgment that the CONTRACTOR engaged under this Agreement is in fact an independent contractor.

  • Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels (a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be, by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect to such distribution. (b) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall also be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6.9.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will: describe the Performance Factor and its actual or anticipated impact; include a description of any action the party is undertaking, or plans to undertake, to remedy or mitigate the Performance Factor; indicate whether the party is requesting a meeting to discuss the Performance Factor; and address any other issue or matter the party wishes to raise with the other party. (b) The recipient party will provide a written acknowledgment of receipt of the Notice within 7 Days of the date on which the Notice was received (“Date of the Notice”). (c) Where a meeting has been requested under paragraph 7.2(a)(3), the parties agree to meet and discuss the Performance Factors within 14 Days of the Date of the Notice, in accordance with the provisions of section 7.3.

  • Carry Forward to a Subsequent Year If you do not withdraw the excess contribution, you may carry forward the contribution for a subsequent tax year. To do so, you under-contribute for that tax year and carry the excess contribution amount forward to that year on your tax return. The six percent excess contribution penalty tax will be imposed on the excess amount for each year that it remains as an excess contribution at the end of the year. You must file IRS Form 5329 along with your income tax return to report and remit any additional taxes to the IRS.

  • Measuring DNS parameters Every minute, every DNS probe will make an UDP or TCP “DNS test” to each of the public-­‐DNS registered “IP addresses” of the name servers of the domain name being monitored. If a “DNS test” result is undefined/unanswered, the tested IP will be considered unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!