Common use of Student Growth Impact Rating Clause in Contracts

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SGSG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. Low Average High

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SGSG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components 6 designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1XX 0.0, SG 3.20 XX 0.0, SG XX 6.1, SG 6.2, and SGSG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on those components and the 8 employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the chart below.