Sunset Review and Sunsetting Sample Clauses

Sunset Review and Sunsetting a. Each year during the OAS Executive Board meeting, the OAS Executive Board, in conjunction with NMSS/MSTR, reviews the need for continuing each existing NRC/Agreement State working group. NMSS/MSTR and the OAS Executive Board also review the scope, progress, and membership of the working groups and suggest adjustments as necessary.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sunset Review and Sunsetting. Each year during the OAS Executive Board meeting, the OAS Executive Board, in conjunction with NMSS/MSST and NMSS/DRM, reviews the need for continuing each existing NRC/Agreement State rulemaking working group. NMSS/MSST, NMSS/DRM, and the OAS Executive Board also review the scope, progress, and membership of the working groups and suggest adjustments as necessary. A rulemaking working group should be dissolved upon the issuance of the final working group tasks, products, or deliverables. Normally, additional work, if necessary, would be handled by OAS, the NRC, and individual Agreement State programs or through the formation of another working group. When additional work is expected from the rulemaking working group after issuance of the final product, the lead organization should discuss this need with NRC management and the OAS Executive Board, and the working group charter should be reviewed and revised, as appropriate.
Sample 1
Sunset Review and Sunsetting. Each year during the OAS Executive Board meeting, the OAS Executive Board, in conjunction with NMSS/MSST, reviews the need for continuing each existing Agreement State/NRC working group. NMSS/MSST and the OAS Executive Board also review the scope, progress, and membership of the working groups and suggest adjustments, as necessary. A working group should be dissolved upon the issuance of the final working group tasks, products, or deliverable. Normally, additional work, if necessary, would be handled by OAS, NRC, individual Agreement State programs, or through the formation of another working group. When additional work is expected from the working group after the final product has been issued, the lead organization should discuss this need with NRC management and the OAS Executive Board, and the working group charter should be reviewed and revised, as appropriate.
Sample 1

Related to Sunset Review and Sunsetting

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • OIG INSPECTION, AUDIT, AND REVIEW RIGHTS ‌ In addition to any other rights OIG may have by statute, regulation, or contract, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may conduct interviews, examine or request copies of Xxxxxx’x books, records, and other documents and supporting materials and/or conduct on-site reviews of any of Xxxxxx’x locations for the purpose of verifying and evaluating: (a) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the terms of this IA and (b) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the requirements of the Federal health care programs. The documentation described above shall be made available by Xxxxxx to OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) at all reasonable times for inspection, audit, and/or reproduction. Furthermore, for purposes of this provision, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may interview Xxxxxx and any of Xxxxxx’x employees or contractors who consent to be interviewed at the individual’s place of business during normal business hours or at such other place and time as may be mutually agreed upon between the individual and OIG. Xxxxxx shall assist OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) in contacting and arranging interviews with such individuals upon OIG’s request. Xxxxxx’x employees and contractors may elect to be interviewed with or without a representative of Xxxxxx present.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.