Task 6 – Review of BC Statutory, Regulatory and Policy Frameworks Sample Clauses

Task 6 – Review of BC Statutory, Regulatory and Policy Frameworks. As per the RFP, this task will use the results of the aforementioned tasks to: · identify where current statutes, regulations and policies are sufficient or exceed the necessary level for managing human health risk; · identify gaps where statutes, regulations and policies do not currently exist for managing human health risk; and. · identify where current statutes, regulations and policies may benefit from a change to enable improved management of human health risks with respect to oil and gas activities. Upon completion of the HHRA, Phase 2 of the MOH project requires a review of existing BC statutory, regulatory and policy frameworks that ensure the protection of the health of the population living in proximity to oil and gas activities. Although the Intrinsik Team’s scientific experts are well versed in the individual frameworks that govern their environmental practices in BC, we have engaged the expertise and support of the environmental legal team from Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx (BLG), LLP of Vancouver. The BLG lawyers will be responsible to the Intrinsik Project Manager for retrieving and providing applicable statutes, legislation and policy frameworks to the oil and gas activities in northeastern BC. BLG will only be providing the applicable legislation and it is very important to note that they will not be providing interpretation, clarification or suitability of the existing BC legislation to protect human health. All interpretation or identification of potential science-policy improvements will be made by the Intrinsik Team’s scientific leads. This task requires seasoned environmental professionals that are experts in their fields and have previously contributed to developing science policy for provincial and federal government departments. Intrinsik has specialized in conducting science policy reviews and providing recommendations to protect people from environmental chemical exposure. It is this experience that will be brought to bear in completing Task 6. These recommendations will be in the form of science policy and would not be a line- by-line edit or rewrite of current legislation or policy. Development of such legislative language would need to be undertaken by ministry legal staff or other such legal counsel and departmental representatives.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Task 6 – Review of BC Statutory, Regulatory and Policy Frameworks

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Quality Assurance Plan The contractor shall develop and submit to NMFS a contractor Quality Assurance Plan, as referenced in Section F.5.3, which details how the contractor will ensure effectiveness and efficiency of collection efforts as well as the quality of data collected by its At-Sea Monitors. The contractor shall further establish, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Management program to ensure consistent quality of all work products and services performed under this contract.

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements 6. The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • Recognition of Union Stewards and Grievance Committee In order to provide an orderly and speedy procedure for the settling of grievances, the Employer acknowledges the rights and duties of the Union Stewards. The Xxxxxxx shall assist any Employee, which the Xxxxxxx represents, in preparing and presenting her grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING CERTAIN FOREIGN-OWNED COMPANIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: Proposing Company is prohibited from entering into a contract or other agreement relating to critical infrastructure that would grant to the company direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure in this state, excluding access specifically allowed by the Proposing Company for product warranty and support purposes. Company, certifies that neither it nor its parent company nor any affiliate of company or its parent company, is (1) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of the company is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; (2) a company or other entity, including governmental entity, that is owned or controlled by citizens of or is directly controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; or (3) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country. For purposes of this contract, “critical infrastructure” means “a communication infrastructure system, cybersecurity system, electric grid, hazardous waste treatment system, or water treatment facility.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.0101(2) of SB 1226 (87th leg.). The company verifies and certifies that company will not grant direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure, except for product warranty and support purposes, to prohibited individuals, companies, or entities, including governmental entities, owned, controlled, or headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country, as determined by the Governor.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.