The Human Rights Act 1998. The Contractor shall, and shall use reasonable endeavours to ensure that its employees or agents and/or sub-contractors shall, at all times, act in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights within the meaning of Section 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Subject to Clause 19, the Contractor agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the Authority and any Beneficiary against all loss, costs, proceedings or damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any breach by the Contractor of its obligations under Clause 37.1.
The Human Rights Act 1998. Public Authorities must share information in accordance with the Human Rights Act 1998, which states that everyone has a right to respect for private and family life, his home and his correspondence. A public authority may share information which may interfere with the above right if to do so is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well being of the country for the prevention of disorder or crime, protection of health or morals or for the protection of rights and freedom of others.
The Human Rights Act 1998. 28.1 The Provider shall, and shall use reasonable endeavours to ensure that the Provider and all Personnel shall, at all times, act in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights within the meaning of Section 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The Provider agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the Welsh Ministers against all loss, costs, proceedings or damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any breach by the Provider of its obligations under this Clause 28.
The Human Rights Act 1998. As well as satisfying the Data Protection principles, agencies recognise that any disclosures they make must also be compatible with a person’s ‘right to a private life’, as described in Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). The Human Rights Act 1998 gives effect in UK law the rights contained in the ECHR. Article 8 of the ECHR gives a person the right to respect for his/her private life, family life, home and correspondence. A public authority cannot ‘interfere’ with this right unless it is in accordance with the law, is necessary in a democratic society and is for a legitimate purpose. Although the sharing of the information through the MASH may appear to contravene a person’s ‘right to a private life’ (particularly in cases where individuals do not want their information to be shared), public authorities are able to override this right in cases where it is in the public interest to do so; is in pursuit of a legitimate aim and the level of interference is proportionate to that intended aim.
The Human Rights Act 1998. 15.1 The Training Provider shall, and shall use reasonable endeavours to ensure that its employees or agents and/or sub-contractors shall, at all times, act in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights within the meaning of Section 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
The Human Rights Act 1998. Article 8(1) provides that: “Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence”
The Human Rights Act 1998. Under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, individuals have a right to respect for their private life. • This is not an absolute right and can be overridden if necessary and in accordance with the law. • Interference must be justified and be for a particular purpose. • Justification could be protection of health, prevention of crime, protection of the rights and freedoms of others. • A decision to share information and the reasoning behind it should be recorded.
The Human Rights Act 1998. As well as satisfying the Data Protection Principles, agencies recognise that any disclosures they make must also be compatible with a person’s ‘right to a private life’, as described in Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). The Human Rights Act 1998 gives effect in UK law the rights contained in the ECHR. Article 8 of the ECHR gives a person the right to respect for his/her private life, family life, home and correspondence. A public authority cannot ‘interfere’ with this right unless it is in accordance with the law, is necessary in a democratic society and is for a legitimate purpose. Although the sharing of the information through the MASH may appear to contravene a person’s ‘right to a private life’ (particularly in cases where individuals do not want their information to be shared), public authorities are able to override this right in cases where it is in the public interest to do so; is in pursuit of a legitimate aim and the level of interference is proportionate to that intended aim. Legitimate purposes are defined in Article 8(2) of the ECHR and include national security; public safety or the economic well-being of the country; the prevention of disorder or crime; for the protection of health or morals; or for the rights and freedoms of others.
The Human Rights Act 1998. The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2426/2003) (as amended); The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 as amended; The Equality Act 2010;
The Human Rights Act 1998. The Supplier and Sub-Contractors utilised in the execution of the Contract shall at all times act in a way which is compatible with convention rights within the meaning of Section 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Failure to comply with this Clause 48.3.1 may constitute a Material Breach of the Contract and the Customer may exercise its rights under Clause 24 (Termination). The Supplier shall (and shall procure that the Sub-Contractor utilised in the execution of the Contract shall) indemnify and keep indemnified the Customer against all loss, costs, proceedings or damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any breach by the Supplier (or the Sub-Contractor utilised in the execution of the Contract, as appropriate) of its obligations under Clause 48.3.1 above, except to the extent that any of the costs, claims, proceedings, expenses and demands arising were directly caused by the act or omissions of the Customer or any party acting on behalf of the Customer.
