The Proposed Protocols Sample Clauses

The Proposed Protocols. In this section, we shall introduce our new protocols, Relay Fault-tolerance Channel (RFC) and Eventual General Agreement Protocol (EGAP), to solve the EBA problem with dual failure mode on both processors and communication media in a general network.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Proposed Protocols. In this section, the proposed protocols, FDAL and VRFC, will be introduced in more detail to solve the mixed faults on links in a general network with FDA compliance. The parameters used and the assumptions made are as follows: ■ Processors used in the underlying network are assumed to be fault-free. (This can be achieved using the FDAMIX protocol [5]) ■ Let Þ be the set of all processors in the general network, and  Þ =n. ■ Each processor in the network can be uniquely identified. ■ Each processor in the general network has exactly the same initial value. (Protocol GPBA [11] can be used to achieve this status.) ■ Let La be the maximum number of arbitrary faulty links in the general network. ■ Let Ld be the maximum number of dormant faulty links in the general network. ■ Let c be the connectivity of the general network, where c > 2La+ Ld. ■ A processor does not know the fault status of the links in the general network, however, dormant faulty links can be detected [9,14] FDAL can detect/locate arbitrary faulty links, La, and dormant faulty links, Ld, within the general network, where c > 2La+ Ld. The constraint of the inequality c > 2La+ Ld is necessary, because a fault-free processor can detect dormant faults when the protocol appropriately encodes a transmitted message using either the Non-Return-to-Zero code or the Manchester code [9,14] before transmission. In the worst situation, the receiver processor is able to obtain c- Ld copies of the value from the sender processor. Where c- Ld >2La, each receiver processor is able to take the majority value among these c-Ld values. Before exercising FDAL, both of GPBA and FDAMIX must be executed to ensure that the general network is free from arbitrary and dormant faulty processors. Each fault-free processor in the general network is able to reach a common value. Thus, the common value agreed by GPBA can be used as the initial value for each fault-free processor in the general network for executing FDAL. When executing FDAL, there are four sequential phases to be considered; the message exchange phase, the fault diagnosis phase, the result exchange phase and the reconfigure phase. Only two rounds are needed for message exchange; one round for transmitting the initial value, and the other for transmitting the fault diagnosis report. The detailed definition on the proposed protocol FDAL is shown in Figure 1. Protocol FDAL (For all fault-free processor Pi with the same initial value, where 1≤ i ≤ n)
The Proposed Protocols. In this section, the detailed descriptions of our proposed protocols Group Oriented Agreement Protocol for processor (GOAPP) and Relay Fault tolerance Channel for Processor (RFCP) are shown here. Noticeable, in the BA problem, the source processor only transmits the message in the first round of message exchange. Because if the source processor is a fault-free processor then the agreement value of the source processor is its initial value, if the source processor is a faulty processor then we do not care the agreement value of the source processor [10].

Related to The Proposed Protocols

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Clinical Studies The animal and other preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by the Company or on behalf of the Company were, and, if still pending are, to the Company’s knowledge, being conducted in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the preclinical study and clinical trials of new drugs and biologics as applied to comparable products to those being developed by the Company; the descriptions of the results of such preclinical studies and clinical trials contained in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects, and, except as set forth in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company has no knowledge of any other clinical trials or preclinical studies, the results of which reasonably call into question the clinical trial or preclinical study results described or referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described; and the Company has not received any written notices or correspondence from the FDA, the EMA, or any other domestic or foreign governmental agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company that are described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus.

  • Research Plan The Parties recognize that the Research Plan describes the collaborative research and development activities they will undertake and that interim research goals set forth in the Research Plan are good faith guidelines. Should events occur that require modification of these goals, then by mutual agreement the Parties can modify them through an amendment, according to Paragraph 13.6.

  • Advertising and Promotional Materials The Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that the Vendor shall have the right to use drawings, photographs, videos or other depictions of the interior and/or exterior of the Dwelling and/or the Subdivision or any components or features thereof in any promotional or advertising materials without notice to or consent from the Purchaser being required in any manner whatsoever.

  • Timeline Contractor must perform the Services and deliver the Deliverables according to the following timeline:

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Concession Area, including its abandonment.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!