Timing of Review of Well Sites Sample Clauses

Timing of Review of Well Sites. The City shall complete its review of the OGP application within 13 weeks of receipt of the OGP application package (“Review Process”), for any Well Site which is not listed on Schedule
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Timing of Review of Well Sites. The City shall complete its review of all OGP Submittal Requirements and its decision on the OGP application within and in no greater than thirteen (13) weeks of receipt of the OGP application package. The OGP application must include all of the Submittal Requirements listed above, unless otherwise agreed to be the City and the Operator, and demonstrate that the Operator has incorporated all BMPs listed in Exhibit B. The aggregate thirteen (13) week timing of the review process will be divided as set forth below. The City shall complete its review of the OGP application within three (3) weeks of receipt of the application. Operator shall have three (3) weeks to respond to Staff comments on the OGP application. The City shall have three (3) weeks to review Operator’s responses to Staff’s comments, and provide Operator with any subsequent comments, if any. Operator will have two
Sample 1

Related to Timing of Review of Well Sites

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Quality-based Selection Services for assignments which the Bank agrees meet the requirements set forth in paragraph 3.2 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality-based Selection in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 through 3.4 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Scope of Review I conducted my review in accordance with Thai Standard on Review Engagements 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity.” A review of interim financial information consists of making inquires, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with Thai Standards on Auditing and consequently does not enable me to obtain assurance that I would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, I do not express an audit opinion.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!