Tripartite Board. If an academic staff member deems that a comment or evaluation on the Annual Information Form, the Performance Review Form, or any material attached thereto, by any person or committee involved in the performance review process, is biased, unfair, or otherwise improper, the member may request that the comment be reconsidered. If the Xxxx agrees, the author shall be asked to rescind or alter the comment. If the Xxxx does not agree, or if the author refuses to rescind the comment or alter it in a manner acceptable to the academic staff member, the Xxxx or the member may refer the matter to a tripartite board. The board shall determine whether or not the comment is to be excised or amended. The board shall be composed of members currently on staff at the University and outside the academic unit where the dispute has occurred. The University and the Faculty Association shall each name one academic staff member to the board. The Chair shall be selected by mutual agreement between the Faculty Association and the University. (See Appendix G: General Procedures for Tripartite Board Review). The University shall inform the Faculty Association of disputes arising under this Article, and shall provide the Faculty Association with the information needed to monitor the progress and resolution of such disputes.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement
