Unresolved Findings for Recovery Sample Clauses

Unresolved Findings for Recovery. CONSULTANT affirmatively represents and warrants that it is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Revised Code Section 9.24, or that it has taken the appropriate remedial steps required under Section 9.24, or that it otherwise qualifies under that section.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Our firm is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Rev. Code § 9.24, or our firm has taken appropriate remedial steps required under R.C. § 9.24. Our firm agrees that if this statement is deemed to be false, the contract shall be declared “void ab initiobetween the parties, and _City of Pataskala will not be obligated to pay for goods or services rendered under the contract. Any funds paid under the contract shall be remitted by our firm to City of Pataskala or an action for recovery of such payments may result. ✔ Affirmed
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The Contractor warrants that as of the date of Contractor's execution of this Agreement, the Contractor has no unresolved findings for recovery as issued by the Auditor of State pursuant to Section 9.24 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Ohio Revised Code Section 9.24 prohibits the award of a contract to any Agency against whom the Auditor of the State has issued a finding for recovery, if the finding for recovery is “unresolved” at the time of the award. By executing this contract, the Agency warrants that it is not now, and will not become subject to an “unresolved” finding for recovery under the Ohio Revised Section 9.24.
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The Department shall not award a contract for goods, services, or construction, paid for in whole or in part with State funds, to any Contractor against whom a finding for recovery has been issued by the auditor of state, if the finding for recovery is unresolved, pursuant to the provisions of § 9.24 of the Ohio Revised Code. Contractor warrants that it is not subject to an "unresolved" finding for recovery under O.R.C. § 9.24. If the warranty is deemed to be false, the contract is void ab initio and the Contractor must immediately repay to the State any funds paid under this contract. If the Contractor does have any unresolved finding(s) for recovery subsequent to the award of this contract, the Contractor must immediately notify the Department of such finding(s).
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The CONTRACTOR certifies that the CONTRACTOR is not subject to a finding for recovery under ORC 9.24, or it has taken the appropriate remedial steps required, or otherwise qualifies under ORC 9.24 to contract with the State of Ohio. The Auditor of the State of Ohio Findings for Recovery Database is located at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/resources/findings/certified/default.aspx
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Our firm is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Rev. Code § 9.24, or our firm has taken appropriate remedial steps required under R.C. § 9.24. Our firm agrees that if this statement is deemed to be false, the contract shall be declared “void ab initiobetween the parties, and _CITY OF CENTERVILLE will not be obligated to pay for goods or services rendered under the contract. Any funds paid under the contract shall be remitted by our firm to CITY OF CENTERVILLE or an action for recovery of such payments may result. ✔ Affirmed
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Unresolved Findings for Recovery

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Cost Recovery for RSTEP Requests by Registry Operator for the approval of Additional Services pursuant to Section 2.1 may be referred by ICANN to the Registry Services Technical Evaluation Panel (“RSTEP”) pursuant to that process at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/registries/rsep/. In the event that such requests are referred to RSTEP, Registry Operator shall remit to ICANN the invoiced cost of the RSTEP review within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a copy of the RSTEP invoice from ICANN, unless ICANN determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, to pay all or any portion of the invoiced cost of such RSTEP review.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5 Execution of Project and Operation of Project Facilities; Financial Matters

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.