VAT Inclusive Sample Clauses
VAT Inclusive. All sums payable under this Agreement by the Trust to the Custodian shall be deemed to be inclusive of VAT if and to the extent VAT is properly chargeable on any supplies made by the Custodian to the Trust pursuant to this Agreement.
VAT Inclusive inclusive of all other taxes and duties which are levied or charged by any revenue authority (including, without limitation, the South African Revenue Services);
VAT Inclusive. All sums payable or other consideration provided to the Custodian by the Trustee or the Sponsor in connection with this Agreement and the Unallocated Gold Account Agreement (including pursuant to the separate agreement referred to in clause 10.1 of this Agreement) are inclusive of any VAT which is or becomes chargeable on any supplies made by the Custodian pursuant to this Agreement and the Unallocated Gold Account Agreement.
VAT Inclusive. All sums payable under this agreement by you to us shall be deemed to be inclusive of VAT.
VAT Inclusive. All sums payable or other consideration provided to the Custodian by the Trustee or the Sponsor in connection with this Agreement and the Allocated Platinum Account Agreement (including pursuant to the separate agreement referred to in clause 10.1 of the Allocated Platinum Account Agreement) are inclusive of any VAT which is or becomes chargeable on any supplies made by the Custodian pursuant to this Agreement and the Allocated Platinum Account Agreement.
VAT Inclusive. All sums payable under this Agreement, including under the separate written agreement referenced in clause 10.1, by the Sponsor or you, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be inclusive of VAT.
VAT Inclusive. The fee shall be calculated by multiplying the number of days included into the custody period specified in Clause 1.2 of the Agreement by the fee charged per one day.
VAT Inclusive. The defendant’s witnesses all told the court that there was no record of a written contract with the claimant.
VAT Inclusive. Advances of the Customers making payments in Russian rubles under agreements, where the cost of services is specified in Russian rubles, including: advances received in 200 for placing Traditional Advertising advances received in 200 for placing Sponsor Advertising Advances of the Customers making payments in US dollars, including: advances received in 200 for placing Traditional Advertising advances received in 200 for placing Sponsor Advertising
VAT Inclusive. It must be noted that this letter, signed by the Defendant’s Manager-Tenancy, does not expressly speak to an agreement for a lease. The second document is a draft lease dated 2007. It is important to note the fact that this lease is for a period of three years and not for the thirty years which the Claimants contend was agreed. It stipulated rental at a monthly rate of Fourteen Thousand, Nine Hundred and Fifty Seven Dollars ($14,957.00) exclusive of VAT. The third document is the Minutes of the Defendant’s 382nd Board of Directors Meeting held on July 25, 2013. The meeting was not attended by the Claimants. However; it records a resolution that the Board accepted the report of the Defendant’s Legal and Leasing Committee. That committee had two days earlier “accepted the recommendation to grant a thirty year commercial lease to Paddles Ltd consistent with the CDA’s leasing policy and subject to: Settlement of all outstanding arrears; Satisfactory compliance report; and The lease is to provide that the tenant must sublet to the CDA’s satisfaction.” [Emphasis added] This resolution, though not at that time communicated to the Claimants, was part of what the Claimant contends was evidence of the agreement by the Defendant to the thirty year lease. Finally, the fourth document pleaded in the Claim as comprising the Agreement for a lease is a letter dated August 19, 2013 in which the Defendant’s then Manager Legal advised the Third Claimant that the Board had at its 382nd Meeting approved the lease for a period of thirty years. The letter states further, however, that the approval was “subject to payment of all outstanding arrears” and closes with an indication that the Defendant’s attorneys will shortly make contact to meet the Third Defendant to “discuss settlement of the arrears and to finalize the leasing arrangement.” [6] The Claimants in this matter further claimed that the Defendant issued an unlawful Notice to Quit in relation to the smaller parcel as it did not provide for six months’ Notice which the Claimants claim was necessary in the circumstances. Accordingly, they sought a declaration that the Notice to Quit was invalid and of no effect. They further sought injunctive relief restraining the Defendant from evicting them from the smaller parcel. The injunction was granted forthwith on March 20, 2015 on an interim basis and it remained in place up to the date of this Judgement. [7] On the 10th April, 2015, the Defendant filed its defence ...