Common use of Xxxx Review Clause in Contracts

Xxxx Review. The following concepts concerning the review of Deans shall be used as the basis for completing the College operating papers that have not yet been approved or for possible amendment to those operating papers that have already been approved, but they shall not be incorporated into the parties’ collective bargaining agreement or be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedure of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. a. The Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor shall initiate a review of an individual Xxxx after five (5) years in that position and after every five (5) succeeding years. The College faculty, in conjunction with other College constituency groups, submits a written review of the individual Xxxx. b. If an individual Xxxx is going to be so reviewed in a given academic year, such Xxxx shall be so advised in writing by the Xxxxxxx. c. The review shall be conducted by a review committee consisting of representatives of the constituency groups within the College, e.g., faculty, department chairs, APs, and civil service, with the understanding that faculty will constitute a majority of the members of the review committee and that such faculty members will be elected. d. The review committee, in consultation with the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor, shall specify the criteria and procedures used by the review committee. e. The review committee’s report shall include its supporting documentation, as well as the results of any vote taken on whether the Xxxx should continue to serve as Xxxx. f. The individual Xxxx being reviewed shall be given an opportunity to meet with the review committee prior to the preparation of the written review. g. The written review shall be submitted to the Xxxx being reviewed and such Xxxx shall be given an opportunity to respond before it is finalized for submission to the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor. h. Both the review prepared by the review committee, and the Xxxx’x response, if any, shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor. i. The Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor and the review committee shall prepare a summary of the review, which summary may also include the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor’s own review. Such summary shall be distributed to the members of all the constituency groups represented on the review committee. j. If there is a dispute over the contents of the summary between the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor and a majority of the review committee, the following dispute resolution mechanism will be implemented: A three member committee will be established consisting of one SIUC employee holding faculty rank appointed by a majority of the review committee, one SIUC academic administrator appointed by the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor, and one SIUC employee holding faculty rank selected by the other two committee members. If the other two committee members cannot agree on the third member, that member shall be the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute or an SIUC employee holding faculty rank designated by the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute unless the approved Operating Paper designates the third member or another method for selecting the third member. The committee will render a final and binding decision on the contents of the summary within thirty (30) days after the third member is selected. k. If requested by a majority of the review committee, the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor shall meet with the review committee to discuss what actions, if any, might be considered/taken as a result of the review. l. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor from evaluating or assessing the performance of a Xxxx at any time. m. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent the faculty of individual Colleges requesting that the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor initiate a review of that College’s Xxxx at any time, with the understanding that it would be up to the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor to decide whether or not to initiate such a review. n. Moreover, nothing herein is intended to interfere with the right of the Board to make decisions concerning the employment status of Xxxxx.