Xxxxx vs. Xxxxxxx. We present our results in Table 3. From this table we observe that making similar decisions in the schemes may lead to different answers. The difference can be explained by the additional question by Xxxxx, namely ‘are writers interests unified?’. Xxxxx considers this a relevant question, whereas Xxxxxxx’x scheme omits this question. As discussed in the pre- vious paragraph, we consider this question not to be relevant for deciding which scheme to use as one must assume that writers interest always are misaligned.
Xxxxx vs. WTI Differential for Inventory Valuation. The parties agree that Xxxxx crude oil included in Inventory shall be priced at the NYMEX WTI price minus $0.50 per barrel at St. Xxxxx. The Xxxxx xxxxx at any other location shall be adjusted with the applicable transportation differential as specified in the Asset PSA.
Xxxxx vs. OAC (Wrongful Termination, Age Discrimination & Damages). Superior Court State of Washington, County of King. Damages not specified. Plaintiff's counsel has notified OAC of his intent to voluntarily dismiss the case "without prejudice". Plaintiff could refile anytime prior to May 1997.
Xxxxx vs. Nu-Vision Technologies, LLC d/b/a Black Box Network Services, Index No. 11-24044, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk. This matter relates to plaintiff’s claim for alleged unpaid commissions in an amount equal to approximately $33,000 plus interest, penalties, costs and attorneys’ fees. This case is currently in the discovery phase.
Xxxxx vs. Supertel Hospitality Limited Partnership. On February 17, 2016, our registered agent was served with a complaint filed in the Monroe County Circuit Court, Florida. Xx. Xxxxx is alleging injury from a slip and fall at the Key West Inn Key Largo on August 4, 2014. This claim is fully insured by Liberty Mutual None. SCHEDULE 6.10 TAX STATUS None. SCHEDULE 6.14 CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS None.
Xxxxx vs. Who’s Who = subject; used as the subject of the sentence/clause to identify who is doing something. Whom = direct or indirect object; used as the direct or indirect object of a verb or preposition. Whose = assigns ownership. Who’s = contraction for who is. ∙ Who is doing the required reading for tonight? ∙ Whom should I talk to about the upcoming program? ∙ Whose sweater is that? ∙ I wonder who’s going to be at the meeting this year. VOIC E ERROR S Passive Voice Avoid using passive voice because it results in weak or unclear writing. Using passive voice results in the subject being acted upon. Avoid: Research will be presented by the team at the conference. Use: The team will present research at the conference. Person First person = I/we perspective Use this only in personal narratives. The perspective is from the writer’s point of view, so the writer becomes the focal point. ∙ I really enjoyed the trip I took with my family last year. ∙ Our car has a flat tire, so we will be taking the bus. Second person = you/your perspective Second person is found in speeches, letters, and non- fiction works. This perspective addresses the reader directly. ∙ As you might have heard, the town is having a xxxxxx’x market next week. ∙ I hope you know you are invited to the party tonight. Third person = he/she/it/they perspective Third person is used to remove the author as a character. It is an objective perspective. ∙ In this paper, the researchers highlighted the newest findings. ∙ They discussed the implications of the newest research. STYL E US E XXX uses The Associated Press Stylebook, “The Elements of Style,” and Merriam Xxxxxxx’x Guide to Punctuation and Style in all official business materials. The following usage guide should be considered in all writing. abbreviations Do not use abbreviations the reader would not instantly recognize. Abbreviations that are widely known, in general and/or within the fraternity/sorority community, are accepted. BEFORE A NAME: abbreviate the following titles when used before a name: Dr., Gov., Lt. Gov., Mr., Ms., Mrs., Miss, Rep., Rev., and Sen. AFTER A NAME: Abbreviate junior or senior after an individual’s name as Jr. and Sr. respectively. Abbreviate incorporated as Inc. acronyms Acronyms may only be used when they are commonly used as an abbreviated way to refer to an organization or term: AFA, AFLV, NIC, NPHC, etc. Acronyms may only be used after the full name is written once in the document. In rare cases, an acronym can be cre...
Xxxxx vs. Xxxxxxx Where an agent makes use of his power of attorney after the death of his principal, the agent has the obligation to deliver the amount collected by him by virtue of said power to the administratrix of the estate of his principal.
Xxxxx vs. XXXXX X. XXXXXXX Respondents Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx (Bantolo), Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx Xxx. Xxxx, Xx. are owners of several parcels of land situated in Tagaytay City. On April 3, 2000, respondents executed in favor of petitioners Xxxxxx Xxxxx (Xxxxx) and Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx a Special Power of Attorney (SPA) authorizing petitioners to obtain a loan using respondents’ properties as collateral. However, without notice to petitioners, respondents executed a Revocation of Power of Attorney effective on July 17, 2000. On July 18, 2000, the Philippine Veterans Bank (PVB) approved the loan application of Ching in the amount of P25 million. On July 31, 2000, Xxxxx thru a letter informed respondents of the approval of the loan. Sometime in the first week of August 2000, petitioners learned about the revocation of the SPA. Consequently, petitioners sent a letter to respondents demanding that the latter comply with the agreement by annulling the revocation of the SPA. On September 8, 2000, petitioners filed before the Regional Trial Court a Complaint for Annulment of Revocation of SPA, Enforcement of SPA and/or interest in the properties covered by said SPA and Damages against respondents. Whether the SPA executed by respondents in favor of petitioners is a contract of agency coupled with interest and, therefore, should not be freely revocable at the unilateral will of the company? Yes. The Court ruled that there is no question that the SPA executed by respondents in favor of petitioners is a contract of agency coupled with interest. This is because their bilateral contract depends upon the agency. Hence, it cannot be revoked at the sole will of the principal.
Xxxxx vs
